torqueboards said:Running 6S separately and/or a single 6S for two motors is pretty much the same. IMO there's no benefit running 6S separately for two motors just adds to more wiring and complications.
There is a benefit in running (2) 6S either in parallel (adding capacity):
- adding more cells in parallel increases the maximum amps you can push through the system
- it also means that by running (2) 6S in parallel you are running less amps per battery pack which will prolong it's lifespan = less stress.
Adding (2) 6S in series for 12S (adding voltage):
- adding voltage will give you more power from the start.
- allows your setup to run at lower amps (since you are running at 12S 44.4V vs 6S 22.2V.)
- bigger battery pack my default. measured in watt hours (6S 5ah vs 12S 5ah is double the watt hours).
- price for (1) 6S 22.2v 20c lipo is $20-22 and price for 12S 44.4v 20C 5ah is $40.
- more power allows your setup to run more efficiently and puts less stress on components.
Single 6S Single Motor (6S 5ah)
Pros
- Cheapest setup, lightest build
- Better to use 63mm motor and not 50mm. 50mm higher chances of getting hotter. Have to check more often to see if motors are hot when riding under harsher terrain (uphill/45min riding).
- If correct kv rating for motor can still reach 20mph. 230KV motor, 16/36 gearing, 83mm wheels.
- Not powerful enough for large/steeper hills 15% inclines above.
Cons
- Can cause more heat in the setup due to single motor and lower voltage.
- Lower mileage range about 5-8 miles due to total Wh of pack - 6S 5ah 111Wh
Dual 6S Parallel Dual Motor (6S 10ah)
Pros
- Cheaper setup, semi light (with 50mm).
- Ability to use 50mm motors. Can divide load (rider,terrain) across two motors. Dual 63mm not needed but still beneficial.
- 230-260KV recommend.
- Can climb 15-25% inclines. Possibly, 30% inclines depends on rider. 30% inclines are pretty hard to find and almost non existent in most cities. A steep hill is about 20-25%.
- Better for climbing hills and braking.
Cons
- 220-230lb riders recommended or less.
- Cost - more expensive, more battery, second motor, second motor mount.
Dual 6S Series Dual Motor (12S 5ah 44.4v)
Pros
- Cheaper setup, 14-16 lbs if not more.
- Ability to use 50mm or 63mm. 63mm for more durability and heavier riders 240-260lbs.
- 230-260KV recommended.
- Can climb 15-30% inclines. 30% incline depends on rider weight. Should be doable at about 200lbs.. not sure for 240-260lbs.
- Better for climbing hills and braking.
Cons
- 240-260lb riders recommended or less.
- Cost - more expensive, more battery, second motor, second motor mount.
torqueboards said:Will start posting everyone's info within this thread due to many repeated questions. This will not only be my own info but many other contributors have helped a lot.
Benefit of 6S Battery to 1 motor, 6S to two motors and/or 12S?
https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=73668&p=1112065#p1112065
torqueboards said:...
- bigger battery pack my default. measured in watt hours (6S 5ah vs 12S 5ah is double the watt hours).
...
torqueboards said:6S is perfectly fine. I ran a 6S 5ah on dual 50mm and dual 63mm motors. It was 280KV on about a 15/36 setup. Climbed pretty much anything from 15-25 perhaps 28% inclines.
I rode 6S for about 6 to 8 months and packs eventually had less power in them so upgraded to 12S which was nice since I was so use to 6S power.
230kv would be better for hills. I've tried lower KV and highest gearing 12T/36T 12T/44T. The results are horrible. That's why I recommend a 230kv-260kv motor.
A higher kv motor (200-260kv) allows less resistance and has higher power output than a lower KV motor. Lower KV motor does and should provide more torque but it does no good if you slow down in the middle of a hill if your motors have so much resistance you can't turn the wheels fast enough going uphill.
So IMHO, 230-260kv works great and you can always gear higher 1:3 or 1:4 by adjusting the pulley ratios.
torqueboards said:I think 230KV to 260KV is a nice sweet spot but that's IMO. In that range, you can easily gear up or gear down.
I tried my 170KV on 1:3 -> 12T/36T no go. Barely climbs any hills and this is on 8S/10S.. Switch to 16T/36T and I'm climbing hills again about 15-20 degree inclines.
So from it you can see that lowest KV and highest gearing doesn't always play out.
A friend also has a 260KV SK3 with about 12/36T gearing versus a SK3 149KV on 12/36T gearing on 10s... guess which one struggled up a hill and guess which one made it up. Mind you he's about 245 lbs or so.
149KV barely made it up.
260KV flew him up.
SO.. IMO Higher KV is better of course below 300KV (can't reduce that far and motors at this KV don't have much more) maybe even below 260KV. with a gearing from 1:2 to 1:3 and 83/90mm wheels.
So I would prefer a 230KV 16/36 setup on 10S/12S... Sure your top speed is pretty high and you don't need it.. but that lower torque does no benefit so you might as well have it so your top end is higher.
You'll also fly up 20 degree inclines like it's flat ground.
It makes perfect sense since
- lower KV motors have more resistance.
- higher KV motors have less resistance and have a quicker RPM.
- it's always easier going up a hill with more RPMs versus slower RPMs and more torque.
beetbocks said:fully agree with torques on that..going lower on the KV is not an effective method of gaining more torque..
I also always gear my boards for a 25-30mph top speed even if if i'm never at that speed at allows you to run in the middle 'sweet spot' 90% of the time..
I've tried special wound 150KV 5065 motors and they just didn't want to move.. better to get the motor spinning up and reduce the speed with gearing.. as just like a small 2 stroke engine all the power is really developed from the high RPM..
my 2 pence - for what its worth..
torqueboards said:I would go with higher KV rating. The KV rating for a 168kv and 1:2.25 would be a bit slow.
IMO more torque does absolutely nothing except lower top speed and no power.
I would like others to try it themselves as I and a few others whom tested it have come to the same conclusion.
Low KV and High Gearing + any battery pack does no good and no benefit even on 12s. If motors can't spin with the current load = heat.
You'll end up noticing your setup running harder because it has no momentum or RPMs to push you quicker.
IMO for any setup. 230-260KV a little lower, higher isn't too bad either 200-280KV. I wouldn't go higher than 280KV. Then adjust as needed through your gearing ratio.
It's much more effective to adjust higher gearing through your gearing ratio versus changing to a lower KV motor. Lower KV motor will add to drag and RPMs will be much lower for the exchange of what people say "more torque" but in actuality you don't get any benefit from it.
Your motors will struggle to make a revolution/rotation due to "torque" and very low RPMs.
We are better off aiming for a decent 25-30mph range even if you only go 15mph. IMO since higher torque + higher gearing = no benefit.
makithepaki said:Hi, i recently started making one and im almost done i just have to make enclosure using vacuum forming. I figured it would be very anoyying to have to keep taking the enclosure off and unplugging batterys just too charge it. Is there any way to make onboard charging. So just balance port and discharge. I plug it into my charger and thats it. i have 2 3s lipo
WeeChumlee said:Aaaagghh
Going round in circles here and do not know what motor is best for my circumstance.
What I want is the best hill climbing ability motor on 8S.
From what I have read so far a 63mm with higher KV would probably be better, but then motor physical length comes into it as well, correct?
So my options as I see them are:
Rspec. 6355 190KV
SK3 6374 192KV
SK3 6364 245KV
SK3 6355 260KV
I am tending toward the 192KV probably just down to physical size now - ''bigger is better?"
May be totally wrong though and the 260KV 55mm long is a better choice down to the higher rpm.
OK confused...
makithepaki said:http://www.ebay.ca/itm/JST-XH-6S-TO-2-3S-BALANCE-SERIES-SERIAL-ADAPTER-CHARGE-2x-3S-AS-6S-/281826763808?hash=item419e2f2420:g:XCkAAOSwYHxWHMky
bandaro do i get something like this. then cut of 6s balance and connector to that connector you have. how do i connect my battery 4mm bullet connector to it
torqueboards said:One thing you need to remember is never to create a short circuit on accident. A short circuit and instantly create a fire and/or burn whatever is connected to it.
Here's a video I made in the past how to parallel charge - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydhyWHsc9rg
It can be a bit difficult in the beginning but once you learn how to charge your RC packs, your golden. It's a walk in the park.
I recommend and suggest to watch a few videos online on how to charge RC packs that way you are more experienced. It doesn't hurt to spend 10-15 minutes as it doesn't take that long.
Anyhow, I plug my packs in this order; (my items)
1. Plug in power supply to outlet. (HobbyKing 350w/550w)
2. Verify power supply is in the off position. (HobbyKing 350w/550w)
3. Connect charger to power supply. (iCharger 208B)
4. Connect parallel charging board or parallel charging wires to iCharger.
5. Plug in battery packs to parallel charging board or wires. Making sure to be careful about the orientation of the wires and not creating a short circuit.
6. Turn on power to the power supply to the on position. (HobbyKing 350w/550w)
7. Make sure the battery setting is correct to your battery chemistry and the amps you charge at are at the recommendation for your battery pack. When charging in parallel, you can charge at a higher amp rating which is a reason why I recommend charging in parallel. I can charge 3 sets (6 batteries) in about 30-60 minutes.
torqueboards said:I do recommend getting at least an iCharger 208B at the bare minimum. If you get a higher quality charger I'd recommend PowerLab 6 but that's way more expensive and isn't really needed.
iCharger 208B $120 + HobbyKing 350W $40 = $160 USD.
Parallel Charging is the way to go IMO. You can charge faster (without ruining the facts) and charging multiple packs is easier since most of us end up wiring packs in series.
Discharging batteries - I typically don't do when charging or on the charger just because it takes forever. I think if you want to discharge packs your better running around the block. If you are storing 3.6-3.8v should be fine when storing lipo. If you store at 4.2v it won't do much immediate damage but it will damage the pack sooner than normal and the true mAh/ah capacity will be much less. Also charging up to 4.10v-4.15v will sustain the pack for much longer.
torqueboards said:The only downside is with an Imax B6/Accucell 6 charger you charge at max 6Amps. 6 Amps is pretty slow if you are going to charge a 6x 6S 5ah packs which is 6S 30ah about 5+ hours or so.
Typically, it's not advisable to let Lipo packs charge unattended due to the bad chargers which may not stop the pack at it's correct 100% level. If it fails it will overcharge the pack and the LiPo pack will pop/catch on fire.
For this reason, due to using Lipo packs. I like charging faster (8 to 15 amps with iCharger 208B) so I only need to watch the pack for 1 hour or less.
With that said, it's not too often an RC charger will fail but at chances if it did.. If you were watching it, you could put out a fire.
But that's just the risk we take. Although, IMO if you watch the charging it's no risk at all.
stuxtruth said:Did you ever get those polycase enclosures?