Too bad I'm too lazy to shift gears. Otherwise I wouldn't mind replacing my hub motor ebike with a middrive.
if the technology don't become lighter, the hub motors will be more suitable for subways or rail tracks, but sadly not for heavy cars, like the Teslas or MG4 (small, lightweight EV cars, like Renault Twizy (the twizy has a classic motor + gearbox currently) would be fine I hope)
These days they might could make the non electrical basic structure of the hubs out of carbon fiber or some other exotic composite.
And dont forget the Torque factor. Having enough torque to haul a 2000kg vehicle ( with passengers etc) up a steep incline like a garage driveway or multistory parking lot ramp at low speeds…..needs a lot of copper and magnets in those hub motors.
Poor ride quality will kill the idea any time.
I dropped ~4lbs off each wheel of my econobox and it made a difference in ride quality i can feel. Imagine going the other way, where you're adding a 40lbs motor on a wheel..
Companies keep trying this and running into the same problem.
This, too, could be solved by a computer controlled fully active suspension...
This, too, could be solved by a computer controlled fully active suspension. Computing power is getting so fast and cheap... add accelerometers, optical and other sensors with motor driven control arms to essentially make the wheels "weightless". I know, sounds complex, but one day it might not be.
Oh, i am sure it will work at some level, Mercedes, Ford, Honda,have previously built test vehicles with hub motors, but with no obvious outcomes ?Given that you can have one motor per wheel, and at least four wheels, it doesn't seem like torque is the critical limitation
I suspect that hub-like motors connected to CV joints and half axles (with or without planetary reductions gears) are the sweet spot. But all that lost payload volume....That's extra weight and expense in addition to the already bad weight and expense of a large low RPM electric motor..
The inboard motor is cheaper to produce and makes a lot more sense!
Multiple motors, inverter/controllers, gear systems, etc, doesnt sound like a sweet spot to me when compared to a single motor drive train, with a geared differential ( as in most current EVs) .I suspect that hub-like motors connected to CV joints and half axles (with or without planetary reductions gears) are the sweet spot.
Yes well, nothing is perfect, and everything is a compromise !Cars. They suck
Couldn't agree more!This reminds me of the days when I was using IRC to discuss 3D animation. This was back when 3D animation was "magic". It seems we had a small but steady stream of people who had interesting ideas on how to improve the program or a new cool plugin that would be nice to have. But these people had zero ability to implement or test out their ideas. As one programmer pointed out to one of these people, "Ideas are a dime a dozen. It's implementation that counts." The idea above is two years old and gives no technical details. And since it hasn't been built, there are is no performance info. No info on how reliable it is. No info on how well it would work with heavy side loads. Maybe its a fantastic idea. But someone needs to build it first. Or to at least run it through some engineering simulations.