I will be voting for Bernie Sanders

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there any information on other Past Presidents Administrations or just President Obama. I don't remember any other President getting so much attention 2 years after being out of office, maybe Nixon. I am sure we will be hearing about trump long after he is out. It will be like the trial of O.J. Simpson, it will go on for years.
 
ZeroEm said:
Is there any information on other Past Presidents Administrations or just President Obama. I don't remember any other President getting so much attention 2 years after being out of office, maybe Nixon. I am sure we will be hearing about trump long after he is out. It will be like the trial of O.J. Simpson, it will go on for years.

What other information are you seeking? During the Obama years his culties acted as though Bush was still president and O Duce was a helpless victim. Clinton garnered much attention until his heart surgery slowed him down, he still didn't disappear. The all time champion of remaining the center of attention is Jimmy Carter. William Howard Taft became a Supreme Court Justice, John Quincy Adams was in Congress.

If you're asking if any other president besides Obama aided ISIS with air strikes, not that I know of. The first Bush aided the growth of al-Qaeda. The only problem with getting information is who is willing to give it. CNN covered Obama's air strikes supporting ISIS at the time, but they won't talk about it now, etc.
 
This helps explain what Bernie is up against. What they are ALL up against. What the real issue is for trying to talk nonstop about impeachment in hopes of the sheeple following along. Working pretty well on some of you, eh? But this will run out of steam, soon, no matter how hard CNN tries to stoke the fire.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2019/10/17/moodys-2020-prediction-election-trump-landslide-qmb-vpx-dbl.cnn

The fundraising isn't getting a bounce from it. The socialist dollar is still coming through for Bernie and Betty, but there's no new surge of money from all the spindoctoring. And I don't really think Biden is in such danger, it'll take more than spending for these others to overtake him. We'll see what Bernie's good debate and Betty's bad one does to the next poll. But as the wannabees fall away, the most likely landing place for people with no real idea is Biden, not a big mouthed challenger.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/16/politics/joe-biden-fundraising-debate/index.html
 
by Dauntless » Oct 14 2019 11:28am
ZeroEm wrote: ↑
Oct 14 2019 8:41am
Is there any information on other Past Presidents Administrations or just President Obama. I don't remember any other President getting so much attention 2 years after being out of office, maybe Nixon. I am sure we will be hearing about trump long after he is out. It will be like the trial of O.J. Simpson, it will go on for years.
What other information are you seeking? During the Obama years his culties acted as though Bush was still president and O Duce was a helpless victim. Clinton garnered much attention until his heart surgery slowed him down, he still didn't disappear. The all time champion of remaining the center of attention is Jimmy Carter. William Howard Taft became a Supreme Court Justice, John Quincy Adams was in Congress.
Don't need or want any info on past presidents but you know that. I was and currently referring to how people attempt to draw attention away from trump by talking about President Obama. The 30%ers just cant get pasted a man like him (law professor) became president with a land slide of votes.
 
ZeroEm said:
by Dauntless » Oct 14 2019 11:28am
ZeroEm wrote: ↑
Oct 14 2019 8:41am
Is there any information on other Past Presidents Administrations or just President Obama. I don't remember any other President getting so much attention 2 years after being out of office, maybe Nixon. I am sure we will be hearing about trump long after he is out. It will be like the trial of O.J. Simpson, it will go on for years.
What other information are you seeking? During the Obama years his culties acted as though Bush was still president and O Duce was a helpless victim. Clinton garnered much attention until his heart surgery slowed him down, he still didn't disappear. The all time champion of remaining the center of attention is Jimmy Carter. William Howard Taft became a Supreme Court Justice, John Quincy Adams was in Congress.
Don't need or want any info on past presidents but you know that. I was and currently referring to how people attempt to draw attention away from trump by talking about President Obama. The 30%ers just cant get pasted a man like him (law professor) became president with a land slide of votes.

Actually, NO, I didn't know you were lying when you said you wanted information on past presidents. I figured since you asked for it you wanted it. As the old saying goes: I screwed up, I TRUSTED you.

Obama is hardly the first UNITED STATES SENATOR to be elected president. More than a third of the presidents had been senators. If he became a professor after his presidency it would be the first time in his life. He did time as a parttime "Lecturer" at the University of Chicago, but except for a little time (4 years) at a law firm (Less than 1,000 hours a year) he was a politician, state assembly, etc. The misunderstanding of his being a professor is because he himself CLAIMED to have been a professor, just as he claimed to be from Kenya when there was free tuition to be kyped.

'What you should have said is "The 30%ers(??) just cant get pasted(??) a man like him (liar, cheater, thief) became president with a land slide of votes.'

Meanwhile, Obama is hardly the expresident most talked about in the immediate aftermath leaving office. He's settling into the 'Forgotten' mode, won't be so long before people trying to name the presidents won't remember to name him. Of course, people such as my self who go to the trouble of LEARNING about these things will always recall, while there'll always be the angry ignorant who will spout off without bothering to care if what they're saying is true.

But you claiming that only 30%ers object to the unethical behavior of Obama (In fact many support him) is an insult to us 70%ers who are infuriated by his lack of character. But you really DID know that. . . .
 
'Meow' has become an official theme of the Democratic presidential race. I wonder just how many Manchurian Candidates Hillary imagines outside her window at night.

So this is year 4 of Hillary's attempt to destroy Tulsi Gabbard. Almost as successful as her presidential campaigns, eh?

But does this mean she's serious about jumping in?

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics/hillary-clinton-tulsi-gabbard/index.html
 
What people need to gain an understanding for is that politicians believe they're going to 'Control the narrative.' That's a real sheeple concept, that they can just talk away and essentially do mind control on you. Oh, of course I've noticed that there are people here on whom it works, but the 2016 election and the meltdown aftermath for the losers shows how unable they are to function without it. That there are masses who can think for themselves and vote AGAINST them as they control the narrative is just a brain dissolver for them. But the Democratic party is not going to face up to what they're doing to themselves as they carry out about 'Impeachment, impeachment, impeachment.' Will they get the message AFTER the damage is done? I doubt it.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/10/19/ohio-swing-voters-impeachment-messaging-research-rich-thau-smerconish-vpx.cnn

Two videos here, the second will start after the first is done. A look not just at Hillary's effort to control even as she CLAIMS she's done, but a seeming confirmation of the stories of her wacko conspiracy theories over the years. It takes the kind of mind to believe things she's been rumored to believe and discuss, or even sort of DID discuss in public, (UFO's for example) for her to believe this one.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/10/19/hillary-clinton-tulsi-gabbard-ana-navarro-sot-vpx.cnn
 
by Dauntless » Oct 20 2019 1:42am
What people need to gain an understanding for is that politicians believe they're going to 'Control the narrative.' That's a real sheeple concept, that they can just talk away and essentially do mind control on you. Oh, of course I've noticed that there are people here on whom it works, but the 2016 election and the meltdown aftermath for the losers shows how unable they are to function without it. That there are masses who can think for themselves and vote AGAINST them as they control the narrative is just a brain dissolver for them. But the Democratic party is not going to face up to what they're doing to themselves as they carry out about 'Impeachment, impeachment, impeachment.' Will they get the message AFTER the damage is done? I doubt it.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/201 ... sh-vpx.cnn

Two videos here, the second will start after the first is done. A look not just at Hillary's effort to control even as she CLAIMS she's done, but a seeming confirmation of the stories of her wacko conspiracy theories over the years. It takes the kind of mind to believe things she's been rumored to believe and discuss, or even sort of DID discuss in public, (UFO's for example) for her to believe this one.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/201 ... ot-vpx.cnn
Well looks like we agree in part. One thing I do know is we don't know the truth. The try to lead us away from it all the time.
 
They're ramping up the fear, irrationality, and conspiracy theories a little too hard this election season. I think the only way to be sane in this culture is to tune out and watch this crap from a very, very far emotional distance.

I'll be sitting out this election because i don't see any honest players in the field, nor is this an honest game.
 
So they put up a party regular to mount a primary challenge. Befits the rumors of the political 'Hit.'

The the plan to be the party of the unlikeable? Biden, who has always been there. Bernie collects the socialists and the lazy. We'll see if Warren is the Howard Dean-Noone votes it was just polls, etc. There's support for the stern message of Klobuchar, not for her personally. Is this how the DNC wants it? Booker and Harris are there until someone else comes along Yang and Castro are out there until they're not out there anymore. Did I forget someone forgettable?

All that's left is to get rid of anyone who IS worth remembering and the party can relive 1988. Won't THAT be memorable.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/21/politics/tulsi-gabbard-2020-hawaii-hillary-clinton/index.html
 
Speaking of "hits", nothing compares to the mafia-inspired GOP firing squad:


Screen Shot 2019-10-23 at 6.01.19 PM.png

Rep Mitchell(R) said:
“We’re here for a purpose — and it’s not this petty, childish b------t,” Mitchell, 62, said in an interview in early September. Pence’s office declined to comment.

The [GOP] retirement numbers are particularly staggering. All told, 41 House Republicans have left national politics or announced they won’t seek reelection in the nearly three years since Trump took office. That dwarfs the 25 Democrats who retired in the first four years of former president Barack Obama’s tenure — and Republicans privately predict this is only the beginning.

M
 
by MJSfoto1956 » Oct 24 2019 7:04am
ZeroEm wrote: ↑
Oct 23 2019 8:28pm
Now I know how the Germans felt when Hitler was taking over ...
If you really feel that way, you really need to see a therapist. The sooner the better.
lol, really! Ok and it all feels normal to you? loss of morals, caging children, building walls measuring craniums of the inferior people.
 
ZeroEm said:
by MJSfoto1956 » Oct 24 2019 7:04am
ZeroEm wrote: ↑
Oct 23 2019 8:28pm
Now I know how the Germans felt when Hitler was taking over ...
If you really feel that way, you really need to see a therapist. The sooner the better.
lol, really! Ok and it all feels normal to you? loss of morals, caging children, building walls measuring craniums of the inferior people.

um, you mentioned bombing Democrats in office.
One could only reasonably assume you were a trumper.

M

P.S. I will be voting for Bernie Sanders (again)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top