First of all, let me say that I'm not an iPod fan.
I am a proud X5 (no, not the ebike motor!) owner, so I don't have to deal with: iTunes, inferior SQ, freezage, easily scratchable casings, paying money for extras that should be included on the player - FM radio, voice record, etc., & non ability to play other codecs (like FLAC!) without third party hacked firmware... I could go on and on. But I was very impressed with the release of the new video (Classic) iPod - the flaship model flaunts a 160GB HDD effectively doubling the capacity of the highest capacity previous generation video & 40 hours of battery life... or so Apple claims. And it's even thinner with a new metal (more difficult to scratch?) faceplate!
One review claimed this in their recent Classic test:
"Our 160GB iPod classic finally ran out of juice after 58 hours and 14 minutes of playback."
http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/11412/ (yeah, I know ilounge.com sounds a little biased)
So the question is, did Apple put a really bad ass new high-tech battery in this thing, or did they just drastically improve the efficiency of the other hardware components in the player to get these alleged numbers? Or both? What does this mean for ebikes?
P.S. - I can't wait for a competing high capacity HDD player that doesn't come from Apple or Microsoft!
I am a proud X5 (no, not the ebike motor!) owner, so I don't have to deal with: iTunes, inferior SQ, freezage, easily scratchable casings, paying money for extras that should be included on the player - FM radio, voice record, etc., & non ability to play other codecs (like FLAC!) without third party hacked firmware... I could go on and on. But I was very impressed with the release of the new video (Classic) iPod - the flaship model flaunts a 160GB HDD effectively doubling the capacity of the highest capacity previous generation video & 40 hours of battery life... or so Apple claims. And it's even thinner with a new metal (more difficult to scratch?) faceplate!
One review claimed this in their recent Classic test:
"Our 160GB iPod classic finally ran out of juice after 58 hours and 14 minutes of playback."
http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/11412/ (yeah, I know ilounge.com sounds a little biased)
So the question is, did Apple put a really bad ass new high-tech battery in this thing, or did they just drastically improve the efficiency of the other hardware components in the player to get these alleged numbers? Or both? What does this mean for ebikes?
P.S. - I can't wait for a competing high capacity HDD player that doesn't come from Apple or Microsoft!