agniusm said:
Hey, sounds good. I like when people do it hard way, best learning way, at least for me. There is a thread here on 29" carbon bike, stealth, low power, nice build.
I cant help you with RC build, have no experience at all. I dont know why nobody jumps in with knowledge.
I think the weak point will be ESC
This ebike build thread is just starting, don't worry, as things get more interesting I'm sure people will jump in and each one will contribute with a bit of knowledge. 8)
As for the ESC my friend, I don't think it's going to be the only weak point, this "weak spots" appear all the time during these kinds of projects, its the price to pay for trying to figure out and build things from your own instead of just buying them straight.
No worries at all, we are here for the challange. Many people will help during this process, I'm sure of it and in the end we will have a better knowledge about how all this works.
Battery will be A123 ANR26650 M1A green cells, 3.3V and 2300mAh. I'm planing on doing a pack with 6S9P, which translates to 19.8V and 20.7Ah. The BMS will probably be the green one we discussed above, its likely to be the best shot for this project.
Regarding the motor, I'm still trying to decide between these two:
An inrunner NeuMotor 1905/3Y that at peak efficiency of 89.7% develops 248W of power, voltage is 19V, continous current is 14.5A and max current is 24A. It has 720KV and using 19.8V battery we achieve aprox. 14256 RPM
An outrunner AxiMotors 5320/34 that at peak efficiency of 90% develops 250W of power, voltage is 20V, continous current is 15A and max current (the manufacturer didn't specified that: I still need to look for that info). It has 207KV and using 19.8V we achieve aprox. 4098 RPM (much lower than the inrunner).
My thoughts are: If their prices aren't too different (I didn't source their prices yet) I believe I would go for the outrunner, because having almost the same efficiency, there is no reason choosing a motor that spins faster if I can use the outrunner with 4098 RPM and get a much simple reduction drive. BTW, I intend to reduce that RPMs to mid-90 RPM, which is an average cyclist cadence, and connect the motor to the crankset. This way, if everything is geared down correctly, the cyclist will be pedaling at an average cadence while the motor will supply assistance at its most efficiency range. :wink: The rear wheel will have a Shimano Nexus Inter 8 so I can get the beneficts of shifting gears.
How about that? Come one people, jump in, give me your thoughts.
Cheers.