Kingfish
100 MW
This is one research project off the beaten path. Very low efficiency on the first try, but one never knows where this will go. Reported on NPR last Thursday:
Soaking up the sun, KF
Soaking up the sun, KF
June 10, 2011
Swiss team creates gasoline from water, CO2 and sunlight
Tokyo (SCCIJ) - A research team from ETH Zurich, PSI, and Caltech has developed a novel thermochemical reactor that uses sunlight to convert carbon dioxide and water into precursors of gasoline at an unachieved efficiency. The feat is a breakthrough toward using solar energy to produce much-needed liquid fuels more efficiently. The process also does not produce any new carbon dioxide.
Search for Energy Carrier
Scientists ask themselves: how can we get hold of the vast, yet intermittent and unevenly distributed, solar energy resource such that it can be stored and transported from the sunny and uninhabited regions of the earth’s sunbelt to the world’s industrialized and populated centers, where much of the energy is required?
This question has motivated the search for recipes to transform sunlight into chemical energy carriers in the form of storable and dispatchable liquid fuels, such as gasoline and jet fuel, usable to propel not only our cars, airplanes and ships, but the entire world economy. This would ensure the goal of a sustainable energy future.
New recipe and cooking pot
A research team around Aldo Steinfeld, Professor of Mechanical and Process Engineering at ETH Zurich and Head of the Solar Technology Laboratory at Paul Scherrer Institute, in collaboration with the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, USA, has recently developed a promising recipe and associated reactor technology.
Their idea is based on a solar-driven thermochemical cycle for splitting CO2 and H2O using metal oxide redox reactions. “The operation at high temperatures and the utilization of the entire solar spectrum provide a thermodynamically attractive path to solar fuel production at high kinetic rates and energy conversion efficiencies”, says Steinfeld.
The solar reactor consists of a cavity-receiver with a small windowed aperture for the access of concentrated solar radiation. The selected dimensions ensure multiple internal reflections and efficient capture of incoming solar energy. A porous, monolithic ceria cylinder is placed inside the cavity and subjected to multiple heat-cool cycles under appropriate gases to induce fuel production.
Efficient heat transfer
With this arrangement, the porous ceria cylinder is directly exposed to concentrated solar radiation impinging on its inner walls, providing efficient radiative heat transfer directly to the reaction site. Reacting gases flow radially across the porous ceria cylinder, while product gases exit the cavity through an axial outlet port.
Experimentation was carried out at PSI’s High-Flux Solar Simulator with a 2000 Watt solar reactor prototype subjected to solar concentration ratios exceeding 1,500 suns. The measured solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency, defined as the heating value of the fuel produced divided by the solar radiative power input, reached 0.8 percent.
“This efficiency value is about two orders of magnitude greater than the one observed with state-of-the-art photocatalytic approaches for CO2 dissociation”, says Philipp Furler, doctoral student in Steinfeld’s group, who is currently working on the reactor optimization with help of fluid mechanics and heat transfer simulation models. Efficiencies above 15 percent are attainable.
500 cycles without interruption
Beyond efficiency, material stability is a crucial criterion for a viable thermochemical process. Using the differential reactor system, 500 cycles of water dissociation were performed without interruption, yielding stable fuel production at constant rates.
In the meantime, Steinfeld and his team are currently focusing on optimizing the solar reactor technology with the aim of scaling it up for megawatt solar towers, such as those already applied commercially for electricity generation.
When asked about the timetable towards industrial implementation, he is cautious and rather conservative: “By 2020 we should be able to witness the first industrial solar fuel plants coming into operation”.
fechter said:I wonder what the conversion efficiency is for growing plants and turning them into alcohol?
boars said:Bit of thread necro here but looks like ETH Zurich are still at it?
https://www.watson.ch/!610265583?fbclid=IwAR2RZY874XIuL_xIC_P0llySvQmg3MMdWj49D4QhJHlByxyUO5gIsSzc0as
The gist of the article (it's in german):
ETH Zurich successfully trialled the technology to create carbon based fuels using solar and regular air .
The solar refinery is already working under real conditions.
CO2 is removed from the atmosphere and is used to make the fuel (gas, diesel or kero)- it's released again when the fuel is burned.
The plant is currently producing methane - one deciliter per day (not a lot haha - even my 125cc bike raises it's eyebrow).
If this could be created affordably at scale, it could potentially stop a net increase of co2 in the atmosphere as there'd be less reason to dig it up.
Apparently it is cheap to produce and a solar setup the size of Switzerland could produce enough avgas for the entire aviation industry.
That's not exactly a small setup by any stretch of the imagination...
Commercialisation is 6 years away.
Part of me thinks this is great, co2 neutral is better than our present situation but at the same time, removing ICE engines out of our cities would be such a beautiful thing (fresh air in the CBD? what is this madness).
The process is slow but steady. And since the Mars Direct plan has the return vehicle landing months or years before the manned mission gets there, that's not much of a problem.boars said:I'm assuming they'll need more than a few deciliters of fuel to get back too.
Yep. The one big plus that ethanol has is that it works with a wide variety of plant material. But it's not very energy efficient. In energy terms it has a low EROEI. About the only time it makes sense is when it's used on plant matter or waste that would otherwise be discarded.stan.distortion said:Sunlight to alcohol gives quite poor efficiency but works well with a very wide range of plant matter, lots of things that would only be considered waste otherwise. Ford did a lot of testing for it as part of the model Ts development and carburettors that could be set up for either petroleum or alcohol fuels where pretty much an essential feature at that time... then along came prohibition :/
billvon said:....
Yep. The one big plus that ethanol has is that it works with a wide variety of plant material. But it's not very energy efficient. In energy terms it has a low EROEI. About the only time it makes sense is when it's used on plant matter or waste that would otherwise be discarded.
For biofuel crops, things like rapeseed and oil palm make a lot more sense. Much higher EROEI. And algae has the potential to be much higher still.
Dauntless said:Prohibition was followed by WWII and the abundance of 'Producer Fuels.' It all went away after the war.