Dauntless
100 TW
Time to send in Billy Jack.
[youtube]4mlSyNZrmFY[/youtube]
[youtube]4mlSyNZrmFY[/youtube]
The controversy over the road rage incident among some motorcycle riders and an SUV driver is growing. Two bikers are under arrest, and now other bikers involved say the Range Rover driver must share part of the blame.
I spoke to some of them in an exclusive interview inside a biker club headquarters.
Edwin Mieses of Boston lies in intensive care at St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital with serious spinal injuries and two broken legs. Fellow riders say he is the biker who is seen in the video being run over by the Range Rover.
It all started when one rider -- identified as Christopher Cruz, who is under arrest -- slowed down and was allegedly tapped by the SUV.
Berger "Choppa" Matthew, a construction worker, was there. He said he is the one seen in the video trying to open the door of the SUV. He said what began as an accident turned into road rage -- on the part of the SUV driver. Matthews said they were worried the driver would hit someone else, so they chased him up one of New York City's busiest highways. Matthews said he ran up to the door and wanted to pull out the keys so no one else would be hit....
... Police Commissioner Ray Kelly would not say for sure if the Range Rover driver, Alexian Lien, who had his wife and infant in the SUV with him, would be charged. He said it depends on the circumstances and whether Lien was being attacked and believed he was acting out of fear for his life and the lives of his family.
Kelly said most motorcycle riders abide by the rules of the road. But he also said the police received more than 200 calls to 911 about this particular group of riders, who came from all over the country.
Matthews said they were worried the driver would hit someone else, so they chased him up one of New York City's busiest highways. Matthews said he ran up to the door and wanted to pull out the keys so no one else would be hit....
That is just plain cruel. Are you in fact a cruel person or just trying to be clever? Speedbump? Really?LSBW said:Why there's so much concern about that guy, also known as Speedbump now? He is alive at least.
arkmundi said:Thinking judiciously, as the defendant, you'd have to prove that "I" was associated with a gang. That has requirements.…
Harold in CR said:Maybe it wasn't reported here, but, I read that the"Bikers" had tried to block off the hwy, so they could go "Stunt Riding", and, the SUV went on his way. That was why they were messing with him. He wanted to use the Hwy, also.![]()
Nice try attorney arkmundi. Now explain Mieses' unlicensed motorcycle rider status and scofflaw history as LSBW posted before. Mieses shouldn't even have been riding. And it'll be more interesting should Mieses' bike be found to have no license plates or to have been stolen.arkmundi said:Thinking judiciously, as the plaintiff Edwin Mieses, you'd have to prove that "I" was associated with a gang. That has requirements. I wasn't, I showed up for an annual bike ride in New York. I live in Massachusetts.
the term is completely fitting. around these parts, stopping in the middle of a highway is dangerous driving. stopping on a highway is tantamount to attempting suicide, with the added factor that it endangers others.arkmundi said:That is just plain cruel. Are you in fact a cruel person or just trying to be clever? Speedbump? Really?LSBW said:Why there's so much concern about that guy, also known as Speedbump now? He is alive at least.![]()
![]()
![]()
I have made no statement that advocates vigilantism or any support of street gangs or criminal behaviour of any kind. I see only a bunch of bad choices in the whole sordid affair. Instead of seeing a "gang" on the street, see an individual, Edwin Mieses, who yay, made a bad choice to ride that day. The greater crime here was the SUV driving over him causing permanent damage that is looking like a loss of the use of his legs. That was not just a bad choice on the part of Lien, the driver - it was criminal behaviour. His best recourse will be the courts and a law suit for maximum damages. I hope he wins.muffinman said:ark, while I often find myself agreeing with you, this time I think you are delusional. even if the SUV was in the wrong, the bikers method was not the way to go about it. they had cameras. all they needed was the SUV's license plate. after that, a phone call to the police and they have completed their civic duty. vigilantism is not ok.
muffinman said:ark, while I often find myself agreeing with you, this time I think you are delusional. even if the SUV was in the wrong, the bikers method was not the way to go about it. they had cameras. all they needed was the SUV's license plate. after that, a phone call to the police and they have completed their civic duty. vigilantism is not ok.
I have no doubt it was. That doesn't mean Edwin Mieses was part of it. He may not even know what he was in for that day. Why focus on the lesser crimes than the greater crime? Why engage in ES-gang behaviour in this thread by ganging up on the expression of a minority opinion. In fact, I hope all criminal behaviour on the road that day is prosecuted in court and that all get their just deserts. The crime of an SUV attacking someone acting as a Good SamaritanD-Man said:The motorcycle rider has his "head" turned around looking at the RR while hitting the brakes. He is aiming for it. Its all planned.
... is the major crime. In fact it was attempted murder. Never mind what happened before or after - all that are multiple minor crimes. For you, its a matter of focus. Focus on the MAJOR crime, not the set of minor crimes.Good Samaritan laws are laws or acts offering legal protection to people who give reasonable assistance to those who are injured, ill, in peril, or otherwise incapacitated. In some cases, Good Samaritan laws encourage people to offer assistance (duty to rescue).[1] The protection is intended to reduce bystanders' hesitation to assist, for fear of being sued or prosecuted for unintentional injury or wrongful death.