LockH
1 PW
Interesting? Maybe... Currently ESB "Search found 23 matches: +Oregon +Bike +Tax"... but NONE as topic titles?
Full title is Oregon’s New Bike Tax and the Future of Transportation Taxes... as seen here:
https://taxfoundation.org/oregon-bike-tax/
Starts:
So. Watt say you, Denisons of the Sphere (watt goes `round and `round)?
Tax? OR NO taxes?
Given that surfaces in public and shares spaces is a "pubic good" (sp? ...sorry)... MY vote? YES.
To any/ALL vehicles including one operator ("driver") and based solely on ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER MILE (or like/about energy use per "62 kilometers". So. For a "skinny" and "small" vehicle with one operator ("rider") any "TAX" presumably would be "smaller"... Add more seats? Recalculate on added passengers weight(s).
Object here is to maybe discourage some folks from spending all/most of their time driving to work just to make the car loan payments.
The THEORY here is that by shrinking the size and weight of vehicles used for *personal* use, "infrastructure" costs are also greatly reduced.
Watt say you?
Merci Mes Amis
L
Full title is Oregon’s New Bike Tax and the Future of Transportation Taxes... as seen here:
https://taxfoundation.org/oregon-bike-tax/
Starts:
Oregon’s new $5.3 billion transportation package includes an interesting wrinkle: a bicycle tax. Although it represents a minuscule share of the new revenues adopted under House Bill 2017, the $15 excise tax undeniably captured the attention of cycling enthusiasts in Oregon and elsewhere. It also inspired others, with a Colorado legislator floating the idea of a $15 a year tax, though a negative response was enough for him to lay on the brakes.
So. Watt say you, Denisons of the Sphere (watt goes `round and `round)?
Tax? OR NO taxes?
Given that surfaces in public and shares spaces is a "pubic good" (sp? ...sorry)... MY vote? YES.
To any/ALL vehicles including one operator ("driver") and based solely on ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER MILE (or like/about energy use per "62 kilometers". So. For a "skinny" and "small" vehicle with one operator ("rider") any "TAX" presumably would be "smaller"... Add more seats? Recalculate on added passengers weight(s).
Object here is to maybe discourage some folks from spending all/most of their time driving to work just to make the car loan payments.
The THEORY here is that by shrinking the size and weight of vehicles used for *personal* use, "infrastructure" costs are also greatly reduced.
Watt say you?
Merci Mes Amis
L