Simulator of electric bike range

[amoras]

I created this application to show customers what the factors are range of the ebike. What do you think about my app?

Hi bartek,

I did a Ebike Route Simulator here:
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=37790

 

[steeeve]

This simulator was great!

 

[bartek]

After a long battle with the update page, I launched a new functionality:

1. Calculator battery capacity and engine power: http://www.electricbikesimulator.com/calculator.php?language=en
The calculator allows you to estimate what should be the minimum parameters of the drive to achieve the assumed speed and range of an electric bike.

2. Catalogue of companies and drives: http://www.electricbikesimulator.com/drives.php?speed=35&range=30&weight=111&voltage=36&power=472&energy=404&energy=11.2&language=en&sort=1&keywords=&s1=35&s2=&np1=472&np2=&pp1=&pp2=&v1=36&v2=&c1=&c2=&e1=&e2=&t1=&t2=&ah1=11.2&ah2=&wh1=404&wh2=&type=&type2=&country=&sG=35&rG=30&wG=111&pG=472&eG=404&calcG=1
Application for dealers or manufacturers of electric motors for bicycles who can put information about your company and drives. Register and add drives - free.

3. All application are interconnected.
With the calculator capacity and engine power, we receive proposals from the catalog drives that meet the established criteria, and clicking on a specific drive turns driving simulator and range of its parameters memorized.
http://www.electricbikesimulator.com/drive.php?id=15&language=en&rangeCalc=30&speedCalc=35&weightCalc=111&capacityCalc=8.4

 

[Kingfish]

I gave your newest edition a spin:

Speed:  64 km/h
Range: 145 km
Mass: 58 kg
Voltage: 63

It came back wtih:
Engine 1981W
Energy 4488 Wh
Bat Cap 71.2 Ah

Now the Truth:
15S8P -> 40 Ah @ 63V

But - I could never run at 64 km/h speed for any length of time, so I dropped it to a normal level of 45 km/h and the results were nearly on top of proven data.

Nicely done. And - I'm glad it didn't complain about my browser

I searched for drives and saw... nothing, but then I switched to "American" :lol:

You are too cool for your boots!

Happy to be a happy tester for you. KF

 

[friendly1uk]

Following the glowing reviews, I had to look.

This is far to geeky for me. Probably far to geeky for any of the reviewers and even the author. I took one look at the top right panel and that was enough. Yes I know my weight, but who knows their rolling resistance even after reading the attached notes. Who knows there drag coefficient, and area as independent figures, If at all. I think it's trying to hard. All I want to tell it is my weight and sitting position. I believe justins presumes your tucking in, as I have to if I wish to match his results. Just a choice between sports or upright would be a nice addition. This is really to much for most people outside of professional race teams

 

[bartek]

This is far to geeky for me. Probably far to geeky for any of the reviewers and even the author. I took one look at the top right panel and that was enough. Yes I know my weight, but who knows their rolling resistance even after reading the attached notes. Who knows there drag coefficient, and area as independent figures, If at all. I think it's trying to hard. All I want to tell it is my weight and sitting position. I believe justins presumes your tucking in, as I have to if I wish to match his results. Just a choice between sports or upright would be a nice addition. This is really to much for most people outside of professional race teams

I know that in its current form regulation of coefficients is complicated. I'm working on a simpler form.