I know Li batteries are lighter than SLA batteries, and give more re-charges, but they don't seem to be worth the extra price in all cases. If you want a really fast bike, I'm fairly sure you need to go with Li to keep the weight down if you still expect to pedal, but for a slower bike...say 14 mph such as with an Ezip, the SLA seems like a much cheaper alternative. My ezip bike was $350 and came with 1 SLA battery. I bought a second one for $95. With both on the bike, the bike is heavy, but with light pedaling, I can go 25 miles on the set up. I have an AmpedBike too. It is faster...23 mph and has a Li battery. Thing is, the kit was $900, not including the bike. It will go about 25 miles with light pedaling too, so the range is about the same. It looks to me like if a person is content to go a little slower, they can come out money ahead staying with a smaller motor and SLA. Opting for speed plus range gets very expensive in a hurry. The number of recharges is different between the two types of batteries too, so that advantage goes to Li. What applications, if any, do you think SLA batteries are a more economical choice than Li?
I'm curious who has the cheapest e-bike set-up? Anything cheaper than a $350 Ezip? Who has the fastest SLA battery set-up? Who has the longest range SLA set-up with light pedaling?
I'm curious who has the cheapest e-bike set-up? Anything cheaper than a $350 Ezip? Who has the fastest SLA battery set-up? Who has the longest range SLA set-up with light pedaling?