what battery to use ? 36v - 48v for heavy bike at 1200W

Give me a minute , kids need to put in bed and need a cigarette :) then ill look into the calculator witch i am hoping to be my holy answer grale :D

The miss is getting kids from school on foot nowdays (since i wrecked some spokes on the old rearwheel) so i quickly need to be ordering a battery, But first my break :p thanks again for the QUICK responses !
 
If it helps I have a heavy cargo bike and a heavy rider living in the Rocky Moutains... I think my bike (hub motor battery) and my fat ass weighs in at 340 pounds but I do load up frequently with at least 50 pounds of crap from the grocery store or camping gear for my touring rides. I had a Ping 36 V 20 AH v1 LifePO4 that I ran with a v1 BMC geared motor for 3 years (and 7000 miles) that worked well until I puffed the battery on some hills. I likely was a cumulative thing as the initial Ping batteries were well used and likely just got tired.

My second battery purchase was a Ping 48V 20 Ah that I puffed on my first ride with a new direct drive motor that I got. I determined I didn't like the direct drive feel and went back to a geared hub motor and 48 V 18 Ah pack from Celman. If I could suggest the 12T geared Rear with a 48V battery has worked out really well for me, I have a 1 mile 7% grade home every day and it so far has worked like a champ for 1000 miles. Seriously, don't waste time and money with cheap LifePO4 batteries from goobiedoobie china ebay store. At 50% power I get about 15 mph on the flats at 75% I get about 20 mph... The slow winding keeps the bike at around the same even at wide open throttle and I have a speed limiter currently set at 20 mph to keep from killing my battery or controller.

To compare the 36V and the 48V is like night and day for me. The 48 V carries me and my bike up hills easily, the 36 V I was sweating and pumping pretty good. I took both on the same ride, a 7 mile 3000 foot climb and the 48 V kicked ass in every way.
 
these are based in the uk and ship to europe

http://www.eclipsebikes.com/eclipse-commute-15ah-headway-lifepo4-battery-p-1060.html?osCsid=5a2de5ed484610e857beb81557039a77
 
Headway:
12 cells * 3.2V * 15Ah = 576Wh
6.89kg

Sony Konion V3
576Wh / 3,7V / 2,25 Ah = 69,2 cells
69,2 cells * 43g/cell = 2.975kg

I would not consider Headway cells for any vehicle, especially one, where weight is important.
 
schwibsi said:
I said it on the other thread aswell: Saving 1kg on a bike makes a world of difference and when you look at the amount of money it takes to reduce a bike's weight by one kg, using a better battery technology is a real bargain.
schwibsi said:
Headway:
12 cells * 3.2V * 15Ah = 576Wh
6.89kg

Sony Konion V3
576Wh / 3,7V / 2,25 Ah = 69,2 cells
69,2 cells * 43g/cell = 2.975kg

I would not consider Headway cells for any vehicle, especially one, where weight is important.

What would the weight difference be when expressed in terms of system weight (rider+cargo+bicycle) percentage?
 
A very common case of misaprehension.

To remedy this, just try a 8kg bike, 10kg, 12kg. up to 25kg and ride them from for a few km each and telll me afterwards that it's not a world of difference.
There is a reason why people spend hundreds of Euros to get the weight of their bikes down. It's not just much faster, but also a completely different feel and handling.
Having a 7kg brick hanging off the top tube - in my book - has nothing to do with riding a bicycle anymore.

But there's different approaches to everything.
A Dodge Ram SRT-10 may have as much power as a 911 Turbo, but it's not a sports car. And in the same way with a heavy LiFePo4 pack you won't get the bicycle feel that you can maintain using light Konion packs.
 
schwibsi said:
A very common case of misaprehension.

To remedy this, just try a 8kg bike, 10kg, 12kg. up to 25kg and ride them from for a few km each and telll me afterwards that it's not a world of difference. I've done bicycle touring with weight carried on the bike and I've pulled cargo trailers. I've also ridden lightweight 'competition' road bikes and 70's Schwinn bikes with 'heavy' electro-weld frames. Its my opinion that the weight 'issue' is exaggerated and fostered by retailers trying to profit off the margin of expensive 'lightweight'.
There is a reason why people spend hundreds of Euros to get the weight of their bikes down. It's not just much faster, but also a completely different feel and handling. Its only 'faster' by the percentage reduction of the total weight (rider+cargo+bicycle) for acceleration and hill climbing capability. Top speed on the flat isn't affected significantly (rolling resistance).
Having a 7kg brick hanging off the top tube - in my book - has nothing to do with riding a bicycle anymore. I agree its different, but in this case he's already in the cargo biking category.

But there's different approaches to everything.
A Dodge Ram SRT-10 may have as much power as a 911 Turbo, but it's not a sports car. And in the same way with a heavy LiFePo4 pack you won't get the bicycle feel that you can maintain using light Konion packs.
Its true that cargo placement on a conventional bicycle presents issues, and weight placement is one of them. On a cargo bike, however, battery weight and volume isn't the same issue, and probably isn't a reason to reject one type of cell over another.
cargobiker said:
…Im gonna rebuild my cargobike to be electric driven. … but keep in mind the 400+ lb. …
 
Yes, on a cargo bike things are a little different.
But I still see no point in favour of the LiFePo cells. And even on a cargo bike, I'd like to be able to pack more weight as cargo over the battery pack.

It's actually not the rolling resistance but the wind that makes up for most of the resistance that needs to be overcome, but I'm sure you already know that.
I agree with you in that I wouldn't pay 100€ extra for an xtr derailleur in order to save 60-70g. But, when it comes to saving 4-5kg on the bike, the numbers work out a little differently.
Also, I don't think the LiFePo4 cells work out cheaper than a - in my view - reasonable Li-Ion pack
 
Lifepo4 is heavier (we all knew that) but it still has several benefits against us18650v3 and even more against generic lithium:
- it outperform any lithium cell on winter conditions. Other cells have a lot of sag and increased resistance
- his lifecycle and calendar life are proven. A lot of manufacturer are lying about their cell. But with lifepo4 we buy reliability. Not saying your cells are not reliable. It's just that it hasn't been proven yet.
- it's cheaper than the new 18650 cells. If you can sell them at the same price as sun-thing29 on ebay then we can say there isn't any price difference. It's not the case yet.

There are reasons lifepo4 are still used and purchased over lighter cells.

If I were to invest 500usd on cells for my cargo bike, choosing lifepo4 would give me proven reliability and increased capacity over lighter cell.
 
LIGHTER IS ALWAYS BETTER!

i have had the pleasure to discuss battery chemistry with schwibsi - he is really nice guy and an advocate to use quality battery and avoid cheap china batteries. And he is getting good reviews from ES members who got a pack from him. I do believe he is doing it for free, only charging for material.

But back to business :)

Schwibsi - can you also comment on the lifeo4 to Konion SIZE comparizon? i believe that lifepo4 take more space than Konions. At least it is true with Lipos.

SMALLER IS (ALMOST) ALWAYS BETTER.. It enables to put more Ah in the same space or save space for same Ah.

I have been using Lipo packs since i started my advanture with ebikes. I have never had any issues but it takes time and skills and knowledge to know how to deal with LIPOs.
Even now i am still at uneasy to have plenty of Lipos in the garage. That is why im considering getting Konion from Schibsi. Peace of mind, no issues with unbalanced cells, good power to weight ratio. They are bit more expensive than Hobbyking LIPOs but lower maintenance, safer and easier to use for people who have not much knowledge / experience in building battery packs.

And the logic "it is already heavy, so i don't care" is not the best one, is it? :) Yes % wise it makes smaller impact but.. LIGHTER AND SMALLER is BETTER in ebike battery world!!!
 
cwah said:
Lifepo4 is heavier (we all knew that) but it still has several benefits against us18650v3 and even more against generic lithium:

I wouldn't consider generic lithium-ion cells because they are, in my view, not appropriate for e-bikes. Most cells have to high internal resistance so the voltage drops too much, when really using them. The only cells, I would consider for ebikes in 2013 are the V3 and the VTC4 Sony cells.

cwah said:
- it outperform any lithium cell on winter conditions. Other cells have a lot of sag and increased resistance
No, it doesn't. The Sony cells drop a lot less when faced with colder temperatures. With generic chinese Li-Ion cells, you'd be right, not with the Sony cells, though.
Also, you will never, even in the coldest winter get a higher W/kg with LiFePo4 than with the Konions.
But then again, most people charge their "small and portable" Sony packs in their house and don't leave them outside on the bike in winter.
I would consider leaving the battery pack outside at -10°C and then going for a bike ride for over an hour a very special application.
With a pack that doesn't weigh 7kg, but considerably yes, it's no problem to bring it inside to charge and have a warm battery that you connect to your bike in winter. Depending on the padding of the pack it will take longer than most winter bike rides for the temperature to drop.
So, in real world applications, even in winter, I don't see myself going LiFePo4.


cwah said:
- his lifecycle and calendar life are proven. A lot of manufacturer are lying about their cell. But with lifepo4 we buy reliability. Not saying your cells are not reliable. It's just that it hasn't been proven yet.
Sony Konion cells have been around for a long time and their calender life etc has been proven time and again. What puzzles me, is why this forum has been so resistant. Are they not available in the US?
The datasheet for the V3 cells states a drop in capacity of 10% after 500 full (!) cycles, at 5C discharge 4.2V down to 2.5V. I don't know anyone, who would do an equivalent to that over a time of 3-4 years. And even at 90% capacity, the cells have a much, much better weight to capacity ratio than any LiFePo4 cell out there.
On a side note: even if you had done these 500 full cycles over a period of 3-4 years, within that time, there will be a new, even better battery technology with even higher capacity and discharge. Just like a few years ago A123 were the way to go, and now they're outdated.

cwah said:
- it's cheaper than the new 18650 cells. If you can sell them at the same price as sun-thing29 on ebay then we can say there isn't any price difference. It's not the case yet.
I don't know the prices they charge for LiFePo4 cells, but mind you that when importing to Germany, you have transportation costs from China, for shipments over 150€ value (that is purchase price + shipping costs) and on top of that another 19% VAT.

I buy all my ebike related parts from China or Hong Kong. And there's always a risk that you don't receive anything, or you get subpar quality. And in case of failure, you're faced with a real problem. I wouldn't know, what to do either, when I have a pack, where one cell was damaged.
On the other hand, I had a Konion pack, that was physically damaged so one cell bank was broken. I opened the pack, exchanged that bank, balanced the pack, and it's back in full operation with just 3 days downtime and costs of less than 50€.

cwah said:
There are reasons lifepo4 are still used and purchased over lighter cells.
I understand why, you would choose them over cheap, or knock-off Li-Ions, but not over quality Li-Ions, sorry.

cwah said:
If I were to invest 500usd on cells for my cargo bike, choosing lifepo4 would give me proven reliability and increased capacity over lighter cell.

That I would have to calculate.
And it will probably depend on your personal risk evalutation.
For me, using a battery technology that requires additional electonics to work properly, is a risk in itself. Buying from Asia is another huge risk over buying from shop in your own country, where warranty rules apply.
On top of that you'll have to look at custom's and VAT charges. shipping time etc. That's a lot different from a pack that you'll get within 48h and that runs completely care-free.

Without conceding that the total cost of ownership of a LiFePo4 pack would be lower thatn a Konion pack, I would not sacrifice that much weight on a vehicle, just to save a few bucks because nowhere on the bike will saving weight ever be easier than there.

But hey, that's what the forum is for. Sharing different opinions and view points. :)
Maybe, I'll make you a nice pack some day and you'll be convinced ;)
 
wojtek said:
LIGHTER IS ALWAYS BETTER!
Except for beer, I agree. ;)

wojtek said:
Schwibsi - can you also comment on the lifeo4 to Konion SIZE comparizon? i believe that lifepo4 take more space than Konions. At least it is true with Lipos.
The Konions can be packed very tightly.
I can pack 1kWh in less than 225*180*70mm. Due to the smaller size of the cells, the shape is extremely flexible with a minimum height of 68mm and width or 20mm.

wojtek said:
I have been using Lipo packs since i started my advanture with ebikes. I have never had any issues but it takes time and skills and knowledge to know how to deal with LIPOs.
Even now i am still at uneasy to have plenty of Lipos in the garage. That is why im considering getting Konion from Schibsi. Peace of mind, no issues with unbalanced cells, good power to weight ratio. They are bit more expensive than Hobbyking LIPOs but lower maintenance, safer and easier to use for people who have not much knowledge / experience in building battery packs.

I couldn't agree more. I played around with Hobbyking's LiPos aswell. LiPos are interesting, where a very high power to weight ratio is required, expert knowledge is at hand. But for normal ebike applications, Li-Ion offers the better package deal. I wouldn't hand my mother a LiPo pack, and reading about fires doesn't fill me with confidence.

wojtek said:
And the logic "it is already heavy, so i don't care" is not the best one, is it? :) Yes % wise it makes smaller impact but.. LIGHTER AND SMALLER is BETTER in ebike battery world!!!
Hehe, yes, every bit of weight you can save at a resonable expense is a good thing. How much is reasonable for the individual depends on the budget and personal taste. I wouldn't by XTR or Dura Ace components and spend 1500€ more on a bike over Deore or XT components, but other people do.
 
schwibsi said:
Sony Konion cells have been around for a long time and their calender life etc has been proven time and again. What puzzles me, is why this forum has been so resistant. Are they not available in the US?
The datasheet for the V3 cells states a drop in capacity of 10% after 500 full (!) cycles, at 5C discharge 4.2V down to 2.5V. I don't know anyone, who would do an equivalent to that over a time of 3-4 years. And even at 90% capacity, the cells have a much, much better weight to capacity ratio than any LiFePo4 cell out there.
On a side note: even if you had done these 500 full cycles over a period of 3-4 years, within that time, there will be a new, even better battery technology with even higher capacity and discharge. Just like a few years ago A123 were the way to go, and now they're outdated.

I don't want to go into a long debate, but I've never trusted manufacturer or seller specs..... And even on the spec nothing had been mentioned about calendar life...... Konion V3 are of course different to the V1, it's not because the V1 have good calendar life that the V3 will have that.

I don't know how you can make such inference. I need more than "word" to agree with you. Show me some graph, chart, member reviews after 1 year usage of the konion V3... then I'll change my mind ;)


And if you can align to chinese price and sell 48V20AH Konion V3 for 500USD with BMS and charger shipped to france I'd myself buy a pack from you ;)
 
you are asking to get a BMW for a price of an opel :)
 
i agree , on the surface of it is true. But in practice , often expensive is cheap and cheap is expensive.

lifepo4 is cheaper, bigger and heavier.
 
Where do you buy your LiFePo4 packs?
Just some unknown vendor in China? Then, of course, you will get insane prices. Go ahead and ask them, if maybe they have some pills to battle hair loss, penis enlargement pills, or a cousin from Nigeria, who wants to transfer funds to you :) That sounds about right.

Ping charges $849 incl BMS and shipping. Add about 30% in customs and VAT, which is the total cost of ownership for such a pack.
By the way, is intercontinental air shipping of large Lithium packs from Asia still legal? I thought that one shipping company after the other refused to ship them.

Wojtek is right on two things:
One: Weight on a bike is always an issue
Two: Quality has its price. Yet in this case it's much cheaper than Ping. Value for money does not compare in the slightest.

Oh, on the Konion cells, sure: no need to take my word for it, or of the other dozens of guys I know, who've been using different kinds of Konion packs (including the V3 and VTC4). I have, however, talked with quite a few guys, who complained a lot about the drifft between the different Headway cells and that it's almost impossible to keep them balanced and use them with ease.
Having to sort the different cells regularly and balancer charge etc. would be a nogo for me, no matter how cheap (which they aren't) or light (which of course they aren't) they were.
 
Back
Top