You dont gain anything from rewinding it. I have 2 of them I rewound one as 8 turns to experiment you gain nothing.wedge said:I don't understand why this motor hasn't been rewound.
If I read correctly it is 4 turns?
What is there to lose by rewinding the motor? There is more than one way to skin a cat.
Wrong.wedge said:Yes but the motor will make more torque at lower rpm, and require less gear reduction.
More voltage and less current is never a bad way to go imho.
wedge said:Yes but the motor will make more torque at lower rpm, and require less gear reduction.
Yes but the motor will make more torque at lower rpm, and require less gear reduction.
More voltage and less current is never a bad way to go imho.
OK I forgot this motor is a 4 turn-thousand, to use RC speakArlo1 said:Wrong.wedge said:Yes but the motor will make more torque at lower rpm, and require less gear reduction.
More voltage and less current is never a bad way to go imho.
It does not matter how you wind a motor as long as you have the same copper fill it will have the same torque!
600V+ Oh sorry I forgot this is a bicycle forumArlo1 said:Winding for 1/2 rpm still gives you the same torque.
And I am already at 170v with a 4 turn... How many volts do you think the DIY crowd should be using???
At 600V yes, at 170V no.Arlo1 said:Mosfets are only good to the 200-250v range then 200-350 is a fail area then igbts take over. DO you want to be running igbts
What you are doing makes sense, and is an interesting project. Good luck with it.Arlo1 said:and lowed the controller efficiency so far you will have something less then 1/2 efficient then its brushed competitor?
I have a long ways to go to get "rich" but its all relevant. I can build anything my heart desiresgensem said:I hope you get rich while doing it... speed is highly addictive, and being able to output that much power in a somehow small motor is just awesome.
OH well.... in that sense this forum has made me uber "rich" already. I can not believe what I have learnt here!gensem said:When I was saying rich... i wasnt speaking about money, i might wrote it in a wrong matter, but I was trying to say really rich, like a wise man.
I live in a 3rd world country and Im still able to do alot of ebike related stuff with a relative small amount of money and less knownledge.
To be truth I never did a RC like build... but a motor near the bb is sounding better every time I look at it again.
BR
Controllers for low inductance motors like this are very expensive. The kelly works but barley and doesn't make much power. Wait till Splinter tries some new firmware in his Kelly to see how well. In the meantime I suggest you read the entire thread on this motor or at the very least the first 10 pages and the last 30!kid08 said:How can i buy this motor ???
and can i use Turnigy CA80-80 with Kelly KBL72221X ???
Thank you.
Arlo1 said:Controllers for low inductance motors like this are very expensive. The kelly works but barley and doesn't make much power. Wait till Splinter tries some new firmware in his Kelly to see how well. In the meantime I suggest you read the entire thread on this motor or at the very least the first 10 pages and the last 30!kid08 said:How can i buy this motor ???
and can i use Turnigy CA80-80 with Kelly KBL72221X ???
Thank you.
I used to think like all you guys... Must buy bad ass motor for project... Then I got this one and realized the motor is easy its the controller that costs. My controller is almost ready to run Hi power just have to work out some bugs first.
toolman,toolman2 said:to answer your question with actual experience with this pairing, the kbl72221x you suggested is good for 112a continuous, i would instead use the keb72800x24v-72v350a8kw as its a bit cheaper at $389 and can do 140a continuous, but no canbus or regen.
now just to be 100% clear on the facts, i have used that excact same controller on the bigger brother ca120 motor thats about double the size and power, twice as difficult to drive, and the kelly easily has all the power needed to dominate the motor, have its windings over 150deg c and has NEVER blown up or been more that just warm.
expensive? -$389...
doesn't make much power? -more power than that ca80 motor could possibly handle...
i know this makes you angry arlo, but you may not have looked into, or experience with this particular motor and controller setup and i am afraid thats just how the facts stack up in this case, and remember just cos a kelly can successfully power this 1.5kg motor, this does not detract even a bit from your hugely impressive efforts to build your own waay more powerful controller, and dyno, and seeing it through to get them running.
-its quite simply a question from kid08, to witch the correct answer is yes.
Dude we are talking about the 12kw motor here not the 7kw motor... This motor weighs 5kg not 1.5kg are you confusing threads??? When you mesure inductance of said motors that are hard to run get back to metoolman2 said:Arlo1 said:Controllers for low inductance motors like this are very expensive. The kelly works but barley and doesn't make much power. Wait till Splinter tries some new firmware in his Kelly to see how well. In the meantime I suggest you read the entire thread on this motor or at the very least the first 10 pages and the last 30!kid08 said:How can i buy this motor ???
and can i use Turnigy CA80-80 with Kelly KBL72221X ???
Thank you.
I used to think like all you guys... Must buy bad ass motor for project... Then I got this one and realized the motor is easy its the controller that costs. My controller is almost ready to run Hi power just have to work out some bugs first.
to answer your question with actual experience with this pairing, the kbl72221x you suggested is good for 112a continuous, i would instead use the keb72800x24v-72v350a8kw as its a bit cheaper at $389 and can do 140a continuous, but no canbus or regen.
now just to be 100% clear on the facts, i have used that excact same controller on the bigger brother ca120 motor thats about double the size and power, twice as difficult to drive, and the kelly easily has all the power needed to dominate the motor, have its windings over 150deg c and has NEVER blown up or been more that just warm.
expensive? -$389...
doesn't make much power? -more power than that ca80 motor could possibly handle...
i know this makes you angry arlo, but you may not have looked into, or experience with this particular motor and controller setup and i am afraid thats just how the facts stack up in this case, and remember just cos a kelly can successfully power this 1.5kg motor, this does not detract even a bit from your hugely impressive efforts to build your own waay more powerful controller, and dyno, and seeing it through to get them running.
-its quite simply a question from kid08, to witch the correct answer is yes.
and can i use Turnigy CA80-80 with Kelly KBL72221X ???
SplinterOz said:Ok cool down everyone
toolman2 was responding to this question
and can i use Turnigy CA80-80 with Kelly KBL72221X ???
For which it is not BS I have ridden the bike and it works
circuit said:toolman,
You talk like you think you know what you are saying. But actually it is BS.
Only one question: have you ran this configuration with no load? I mean kelly+CA120 with nothing conneted to it: no transmission, no fan. Did you ever try to run it for, like, 5-10 minutes? What was the temperature after that run? 150°C?
It looks like you have no idea what people are talking about this magical inductance and why lack of it is bad.
I have to go back and look at the 80-80 I might be thinking of a different motor but I thought it was one at 10uH inductance.toolman2 said:circuit said:toolman,
You talk like you think you know what you are saying. But actually it is BS.
Only one question: have you ran this configuration with no load? I mean kelly+CA120 with nothing conneted to it: no transmission, no fan. Did you ever try to run it for, like, 5-10 minutes? What was the temperature after that run? 150°C?
It looks like you have no idea what people are talking about this magical inductance and why lack of it is bad.
-yes i ran them both for hours both on the dyno at full load, no load and everywhere in between, then on a bike and posted up a vid.
tested with a transmition, and without, with a fan and without, and yes from 20deg to around 170deg c and the kelly shows no ill effects like heating or blow ups from the inductance of the motors (the sub 2.5kg rc ones) in question. -BS? -really? where? -did i miss something?
and arlo, no, im not suggesting you buy a $300-$500 kelly if you want to run the collosus, YOU as apposed to others have quite a large controller project on the go :lol:
as we have mentioned on many, many occasions now, spinter is only running headways, and the limits on them are a little lower than the limits of his kelly, thay sag above 5-8kw and thats about all the power he is after for now (his main need power wise has allways been 100kph max) and that power from the last dyno run nearly gets him there, his kelly that was about $800 is now over 2 years old and undersized for the colossus, but suited to all his needs and has still never blown up even after running 250amps into the collosus, around 40NM of torque at a torturous 100rpm, taking the motor over 150deg c within minuets. we will be tweaking this setup further soon, but notice how the above situation is massively disappointing to you, yet splinter is stoked with it, cos not everyone is ALLWAYS after mega maxed out burst power![]()
so arlo i understand that you are using the "no other solution" mentality as motivation for your controller build but it wont help to get angry and shoot down every other persons attempt at running even a small rc motor, there are many people with many ideas and options who may have success with a bit of our help.
just think for a second about what kid08 is hoping to do, its only a litlle 1.5kg motor, he is new, may even have some optimism, in fact he could run it on an 18fet for about $180 (ive done it, but its way touchy on the throttle) so why not give a brother a chance, or even a hand? -isnt that what we are meant to do here??
and yes we are on the right thread, the guy even asked about how to buy a collosus.
anyway, in my opinion the answer to the guys question is yes, yours and circiuts answer is no, now lets call it done and drop this, ill get to some new ca120 motor testing (keen to measure inductance somehow with a function gen and a cro??) and please keep at it and keep us up to date with your impressive efforts on the mega controller and back on topic of the collosus.. -ive heard theres a new one soon?