Mark Pace
1 mW
Is there a handy chart or database anywhere that lists the bb axle widths of various mid-drive motors? Not the frame BB widths they fit, but of the axle the cranks fit on.
Unboxing and installing a Bafang M225 motor (which I think is otherwise known as a BBS02 in a '250W' configuration) I was sorry to see that its axle measures a whopping 174mm long, which is right in the middle of what most fatbikes with 4 to 5" tires use. It may be as short as usually possible on the right, but the left is much longer than it needs to be. When I last installed a 500w iteration of the same motor, over a year ago, I don't remember it being so very wide, but maybe it was.
With the supplied Bafang crankarms (90°, but with a slight offset) the 'q-factor' (aka tread) will be close to 195mm, which looks pretty silly on a bike with 45mm tires and 90mm wide chainstays (where they are closest to the pedals.) With the slimmest, straightest, most zero-offset arms I know of (Schumpf, and only in their 170mm length) that 195 can be improved by maybe 10-12mm, but that's about it. With any arms having substantial (and nowadays typical) offset, it is really ridiculous.
So my 2nd question is, does anyone know of any square taper arms in any lengths shorter than 170 that are 90° with 0 or near-0 offset? I have some 160's, but they stick out so far on this motor that you can just about put your fist between the chainstays and crankarm ends.
Unboxing and installing a Bafang M225 motor (which I think is otherwise known as a BBS02 in a '250W' configuration) I was sorry to see that its axle measures a whopping 174mm long, which is right in the middle of what most fatbikes with 4 to 5" tires use. It may be as short as usually possible on the right, but the left is much longer than it needs to be. When I last installed a 500w iteration of the same motor, over a year ago, I don't remember it being so very wide, but maybe it was.
With the supplied Bafang crankarms (90°, but with a slight offset) the 'q-factor' (aka tread) will be close to 195mm, which looks pretty silly on a bike with 45mm tires and 90mm wide chainstays (where they are closest to the pedals.) With the slimmest, straightest, most zero-offset arms I know of (Schumpf, and only in their 170mm length) that 195 can be improved by maybe 10-12mm, but that's about it. With any arms having substantial (and nowadays typical) offset, it is really ridiculous.
So my 2nd question is, does anyone know of any square taper arms in any lengths shorter than 170 that are 90° with 0 or near-0 offset? I have some 160's, but they stick out so far on this motor that you can just about put your fist between the chainstays and crankarm ends.