• Hello ES! We could use some help to get us past the finish line on building the new knowledgebase for the forum.
    Can you donate? Please see our fundraising page. Thank you!

Copenhagen Wheel Battery Replacement

It should be easy enough to find a 48V charger with variable current setting.
As it turns out, I found a charger that also outputs the 16s nominal voltage, and then purchased and installed a new Rosenberger magnetic plug (same as original). Works well, just had to be sure and match the plugs wiremap that uses a pseudo interlock with the negative.
 
Started battery replacement in wheel #2. Got the bus bar design improved, aside from my bird shot style spot welds... At least they are well bonded and strong?

  1. Note, I took the nice advice of @Zambam and soldered the ring terminals to the Cu ribbon first.
  2. Then did minor surface prep on top of the ring terminals, including a rotary tool diamond wheel to plane the contact for the welds,
  3. Then light acid wash (pH ~3 acetic acid) to clean burnt flux or any contamination from the weld site.
  4. After that, I spot welded the Fe-Ni parallel tab on top.
  5. The next step was trim excess of the Cu ribbon so it matches the footprint of the Fe-Ni parallel tab using scissors, then clean the edge with drum sander on rotary tool.
  6. Lastly i precut all my bus cables and heat shrink, crimped and sealed.

The cell distributor only sent me 25 by mistake, and when I contacted after discovery on July 4th, they replied in less than 30 min on the national holiday and hustled a shipment to me with the missing cell at no charge. Awesome service by @DIY500ampbattery.

When that cell gets here in the next few weeks, I'll prep for final assembly and test ride.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20260704_153615259.jpg
    PXL_20260704_153615259.jpg
    3.9 MB · Views: 5
  • PXL_20260704_163453344.jpg
    PXL_20260704_163453344.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 5
  • PXL_20260704_191013713.jpg
    PXL_20260704_191013713.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 5
  • PXL_20260704_220029169.jpg
    PXL_20260704_220029169.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 5
Last edited:
The next step was trim excess of the Cu ribbon so it matches the footprint of the Fe-Ni parallel tab using diamond wheel and drum sander on rotary tool.
Would scissors be faster to trim the copper to match the round ends of the Fe-Ni? I don't think slotting the copper was necessary. It would weld to the cells fine w/o it.

Did you get much solder splatter spot welding? Do you think you will get more splatter when welding to the cells?
 
Scissors would be, and were faster. I've updated the post with that aspect! I forgot to add that step.

When I tried soldering without the slot to dead cells the bond was not nearly as strong as when I did add the slot. It was a hassle but hopefully worth it for peace of mind in the welds holding up.

I strove to use as little solder as possible to avoid splatter and it worked mostly. I had a few drops weep out from the weld sites around the ring terminals, then used a flush cutter to clean off. If somehow the cells get hot enough to remelt the solder it would definitely be a problem, but if the cells are at that temperature and the BMS has not shut things off, there are other problems...

I also did my best to not get much solder towards the ends of the copper ribbon so that when I do spot weld to the cells, there should be very minimal to no solder local to the weld site.
 
I test weldied old cells with and w/o the slot using Cu by itself and also 304 ss / Cu sandwich with my Awithz UF20B.

Cu by itself did not produce good welds w or w/o the slot.

304 ss/ Cu sandwich (0.1mm/ 0.2 mm) produced equally good welds w or w/o the slot. So I stopped using the slot.

You did your own tests with a different welder and materials. You made the right decision based on your own results. Looking good!
 
Back
Top