Lock
100 MW
Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Lithium-Ion and Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles
New study from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), just published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es103607c
Buts ya gotta pay or subscribe to read the thing online... One report:
http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/2011...batteries-cause-less-environmental-damage.htm
New study from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), just published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es103607c
Abstract
This study presents the life cycle assessment (LCA) of three batteries for plug-in hybrid and full performance battery electric vehicles. A transparent life cycle inventory (LCI) was compiled in a component-wise manner for nickel metal hydride (NiMH), nickel cobalt manganese lithium-ion (NCM), and iron phosphate lithium-ion (LFP) batteries. The battery systems were investigated with a functional unit based on energy storage, and environmental impacts were analyzed using midpoint indicators. On a per-storage basis, the NiMH technology was found to have the highest environmental impact, followed by NCM and then LFP, for all categories considered except ozone depletion potential. We found higher life cycle global warming emissions than have been previously reported. Detailed contribution and structural path analyses allowed for the identification of the different processes and value-chains most directly responsible for these emissions. This article contributes a public and detailed inventory, which can be easily be adapted to any powertrain, along with readily usable environmental performance assessments.
Buts ya gotta pay or subscribe to read the thing online... One report:
http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/2011...batteries-cause-less-environmental-damage.htm
Study Finds Lithium-ion Batteries Cause Less Environmental Damage
Posted 06 May 2011 @ 02:45 pm BST
Source: http://www.ntnu.edu/ and EVWorldWire
A recent research undertaken at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and published in the current issue of Environmental Science and Technology, a scientific journal, provides details on the three major types of batteries that are currently in use, their efficiency and the quantity of environmental impact during their manufacturing process.
The research finds that on a per-storage basis, the nickel metal hydride (NiMH) battery affects the environment worst, closely accompanied by the nickel cobalt manganese lithium-ion (NCM) and iron phosphate lithium-ion (LFP) batteries. The researchers have observed 11 types ecological impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions, ecotoxicity in freshwater, human toxicity and freshwater eutrophication excluding the ozone depletion potency. They have also found global warming discharges with higher level lifecycle than reported previously during the research.
The researchers found that the two Li-ion batteries performed better than then NiMH battery due to their 2 to 3 times increased energy storage capability in their life time and higher level of usage period efficiency in comparison with NiMH. The NCM and LFP Li-ion batteries are observed to contain less quantity of nickel and no trace of rare earth metals. The LFP batteries are found to offer more ecological benefits when compared to NCM due to its increased usage life period and use of metals that do not affect the environment.
All the three types of batteries needed the same level of energy during their production process, thus releasing the same level of greenhouse gases. The manufacture of polytetrafluoroethylene, which is used as a dispersant/binder in the electrode paste used in the batteries, found to be the cause for over 97% ozone depletion qualities of the batteries. The two Li-ion batteries released at least 14 to 15% increased level of carbon dioxide discharges during the production process due to release of halogenated methane discharges. The cell containers, module packages, materials used for separation and the electrolyte used in the packing of the batteries found causing less than 10% eco-damages in all categories. The researchers concluded that iron phosphate lithium-ion (LFP) batteries cause less environmental impact due to their increased life expectancy.