Your statement two posts above still does not match what what happens on my bike, in the real world. Ya'll know I know zero electronics, so my opinions are not based on formulas, but what my bike does out riding. Niether of my slower winding bikes slow down in the wind because they wind out at thier top speed at far lower wattage than they have avaliable. So when they get some resistance from a moderate hill or some medium headwind they simply draw up to 1000 watts and keep chugging along.
So wide open throttle gives me the speed I want, on the flat, on the hills, etc. The slow winding motors give me much much nicer starts, particularly those devilsh uphill starts. On the dirtbike, the slow winding climbs hills cooler. Very important on a trail bike. On the commuter, it simply forces me to ride at a speed that won't get me banned from the bike trails. ( bad right hand, I should cut it off) On the commuter, this motor is also ideal for any 80 mile rides I may want to take on weekends. It very efficiently mizers out the power so I don't have to think about throttle settings for 80 miles. I just crank it, and enjoy the ride.
In other places, as you are, the problems are different. I've found a great solution to my problems with the 10 wind motor. You have different problems where you ride, and solved them your way very nicely. Luckily you have some beefy motors to do it with. Your throw the watts at it method may not work so well with a 9 continent motor, unless your ride is very short.
Hopefully the Death Race is short enough for me to throw 3500 watts at my bike for 12 laps without melting. I know for sure, I'll be about to melt on the last lap. It's either brakes on full or throttle on full in that race, for 10 miles. No room for any cruising. Just on off, on off.
Edit. Of course, half the reason I overreact, is that I misunderstand all that motor theory. But the idea of pick a speed, then decide on a voltage, then pick a motor that matches the speed range you want at that voltage works well.