I'm in the final stages of choosing a hub motor for a partially streamlined recumbent touring bike. Human power as well as hub motor
efficiency is very important for am planning to spend many hours in the 'saddle' on this Trans-Am solo ride. Looking to carry at least
one 48/20 ping if not two on board the bent figuring on around 60-80 miles of assist with about the same under human power alone.
I've read where the Ezee hub is around 75% efficient in it's sweet spot and the 9 continent about 85% or so. Question: would the 10% or
so increased efficiency of the 9cont more than make up for its increased cogging effect when under human power? I do like to pedal and would
use the motor primarily on the climbs, into a stiff headwind, and when very tired.
Another question: To overcome the cogging effect of the 9 cont, could one merely just give it a little 'juice' to overcome the coggin effect?
Would we be talking many watts if that were the case? Thanks for your help. I'm a noobie.
efficiency is very important for am planning to spend many hours in the 'saddle' on this Trans-Am solo ride. Looking to carry at least
one 48/20 ping if not two on board the bent figuring on around 60-80 miles of assist with about the same under human power alone.
I've read where the Ezee hub is around 75% efficient in it's sweet spot and the 9 continent about 85% or so. Question: would the 10% or
so increased efficiency of the 9cont more than make up for its increased cogging effect when under human power? I do like to pedal and would
use the motor primarily on the climbs, into a stiff headwind, and when very tired.
Another question: To overcome the cogging effect of the 9 cont, could one merely just give it a little 'juice' to overcome the coggin effect?
Would we be talking many watts if that were the case? Thanks for your help. I'm a noobie.