Galileo/Newton agree-- 9/11 was an inside job!

[nutnspecial]

I absolutely agree with you mega. Just trying to cover both sides, and ask the 'officials' to look for more information and especially docu's that support their official POUFF story.

 

[markz]

Not really THAT important!
Just chillax with some beers. I wonder if the new BudLight maragarita beer has a beery taste or a smoother Vodka taste.
Too many choices these days. 7eleven Slushy and a mickey of Smirnoff or Alberta Ice Vodka!

 

[Punx0r]

The fallacy of the middle ground:

 

[nutnspecial]

Hehehe a sense of humor ^^^ :lol:

 

[Punx0r]

Ah, you are still reading this thread Come on then, let's have an example of this "irrefutable evidence based on plainly visible and verifiable data, using basic science".

Detail ONE claim that you believe is "irrefutable evidence supporting controlled demolition". Explain it in terms of "because X (fact), Y (result). Any one you like, but it must be a cogent argument and you must understand it.

let's see if we can keep you on a single subject with static goalposts.

 

[nutnspecial]

Whoa, sup with that link? Valid points regardless! Applicable to all things, an appeal to the best of each person?

Punx, you would have found your question answered in prob 90% of the linked material, and I also tried with the POUFF explanation, to get you going in that direction, but if you wanna believe everything that's spoon fed (gov, church) to ya, that's your right, cuz the spoon is there, and it's full of baby food (or whatever you like) Say 'ahh'!!

 

[nutnspecial]

Thanks Etrike, for the thread!

Peace

 

[Punx0r]

Punx, you would have found your question answered in prob 90% of the linked material, and I also tried with the POUFF explanation

Trying to construct your arguments:

1) Random image with no explanation, just the word "pouff".
2) *handwave* "the information is somewhere in the hundreds of hours of videos, posted in dozens of places throughout a 19 page internet thread"

Try again

I was hoping for an answer from eTrike, as I figured he could copy something convincing from the AE911T sites, but if you guys want to co-operate that's fine with me.

 

[dnmun]

pouff is a well known analytic technique. Pee Wee Herman introduced it back in the 1980s when MTV introduced him to the world and he could solve problems using the pouff technique.

when there is a discontinuity in the scheme of things shown in his educational videos, then the pouff technique quickly removed the impediments in his video.

you have to have an advanced physics degree to use the hand waving form of discussion and it is commonly restricted to lectures in advanced physics. when used in other venues it can lead to uncertainty and discontinuities in the solution.

 

[nutnspecial]

Lol ^^


POUFF

Punx, it's been discussed to death already, anyone that would argue with you is already convinced, and has probably moved on to even more important things. The world is a very strange place indeed.

You disagree, we get it. Sorry but I guess I can't make you happy, probably no 'unofficial' information can.

 

[Punx0r]

You sound like the issue has been resolved. If so, it should be even easier for you to quote me one irrefutable argument supporting your claims. Do you have one? Yourself and eTrike have repeatedly asserted there is a mass of such evidence.

 

[nutnspecial]

You say it's not evidence, so how can we argue with that bud? Links posted all the way back thru this thread.
I believe you took the time to literally catalogue the play time of at least one poster's embedded video, and said:

"AINT NOBODY GOT TIME FOR DAT"
So yeah, any perceived argument are over between you and I. I'll happily attempt to discuss or attempt to answer questions, but I'm pretty sure I have more questions than you on the subject, sir. The topic is very interesting, and there are MANY more that could illuminate a larger picture if people are willing.

Go look at the moon landing hoax, BBC has a special on it!

 

[markz]

Go look at the moon landing hoax, BBC has a special on it!

That circus was over eons ago, the new circus in town is the 9/11 spin-ola!

 

[neptronix]

There's a couple videos on youtube that call themselves bbc moon landing hoax documentaries..

In typical BBC fashion, they open with a bible quote and JFK conspiracy theories at the end!
Seems legit.. :lol:

 

[nutnspecial]

Yeah, the bible quote is weird on that one, although I'm not afraid of christians. Let them behead me or whatever. The book has some good stuff that is also in the other faiths of that time.

I really thought the main body of that one was bbc though? Maybe it's just the girl is english accented :lol: But seriously, the bs surrounding nasa is certainly worthy of it's own topic? Let punx and the others come and debate that?

There's the other docu where the guy is kinda an ahole and get's punched in the face too :lol: doesn't mean there isn't alot of relevant info and points, and actual supposed vid of a hoax?

I found this funny https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnnm1ztNO_I

Ps, bart sibrel is the guy that got punched by (buzz, I think?) The other docu seems more professional though.
Dammit, sorry etrike, this was how the thread started to go off topic, I in no way mean to dissuade or detract from the OP and topic.

 

[Punx0r]

You say it's not evidence, so how can we argue with that bud?

In the same way I can point at a duck and say, "by the definitions generally agreed by society, that is not a banana"

So yeah, any perceived argument are over between you and I.

I'll take that as an admission that you're abandoning your "controlled demolition" theory as unprovable

I'll happily attempt to discuss or attempt to answer questions

Cool. I have only one. It asks for a single falsifiable claim supporting your "controlled demolition" theory. I think one month is more than adequate time to come up with something (given the alleged copious amount of supporting evidence), if that time elapses with a claim being presented, I say the debate (if it can be called that) is forfeited by the Truthers. And they must forever hold their peace on the subject unless new evidence should emerge.

 

[Punx0r]

In the meantime, I do love xkcd.

 

[nutnspecial]

How original :lol: ! You are very good at using evidence to prove your points son. Bring it

 

[nutnspecial]

Re, prev post, just watch the footage of the towers falling!

 

[Punx0r]

Ooh, another one:

 

[Arlo1]

[youtube]DJnwPvo8q_k[/youtube]

Yup keep arguing with the eye witnesses

 

[markz]

NIST is not reputable if they didnt do expiriments.

Why believe them if they aren'te scientific, they would have done it first. They didnt and are not scientific!

Maybe they just want to decieve instead.

 

[Punx0r]

[VID]

Yup keep arguing with the eye witnesses

Repostah!

 

[nutnspecial]

If you could have waited one more day punxor,

We would have had a perfect 11,11,11 / 33 days surrounding the memorial anniversary divided into thirds

 

[Punx0r]

The tendency of the human mind to perceive patterns in random data is well known and common.