I work on sleds for a living in the winter and its were i started in my industry. I have worked on sleds with well over 300hp Dyno proven! The one thing lacking is torque and when you remove the need for a heavy CVT and put a lighter motor in the power needs drop drasticaly! The power to weight ratio thing is why bombardier does so well. Most the sleds I work on people spend 15-40k on to ride a couple weekends a year in the mountains!ZOMGVTEK said:This is definitely an area where electric does not shine. Not only are the batteries at a major disadvantage from being in the cold, but you also need a TON of continuous power for anyone to care. The advantages are almost nonexistent, since current solutions work great. With ample power and a CVT, the engine is almost never out of the power band. The few sleds I rode all make enough power to lift the skis or spin the track, right off the line. Beyond that it only revs more, making more power.
This stuff is generally a snoozefest below 100HP. 150-200 is a bit more fun. In electric, thats AWFULLY hard to replicate for any length of time.
What the hell are you talking about?motorino magnet said:Canadian(Harper) Government is looking for some and they are prepared to pay BIG bucks to sneak up on ....
Multi- millions available to the winner.RCMP and military want them real quick for some reason...
Arlo1 said:I work on sleds for a living in the winter and its were i started in my industry. I have worked on sleds with well over 300hp Dyno proven! The one thing lacking is torque and when you remove the need for a heavy CVT and put a lighter motor in the power needs drop drasticaly! The power to weight ratio thing is why bombardier does so well. Most the sleds I work on people spend 15-40k on to ride a couple weekends a year in the mountains!
Arlo1 said:What the hell are you talking about?motorino magnet said:Canadian(Harper) Government is looking for some and they are prepared to pay BIG bucks to sneak up on ....
Multi- millions available to the winner.RCMP and military want them real quick for some reason...
fechter said:Human hunters?
There is no way in hell you will see 200HP at the track without a turbo on a SRX. The rule is almost 1/2 your hp is lost through the CVT and track drag etc!!! SO that SRX would have had to be close to 400hp! I worked at the only proper chassis dyno in Canada (1 of 4 in the world) for 2 years in the evenings helping a buddy out in my spare time and with a HO800 skidoo with ~140-150 hp at the motor on a stock sled you would see 70-80hp at the track and that was a high number. We put together some good numbers for University of Alberta and some other cool things like a few turbo RX1s and Even a couple supercharged rx1 The coolest was probably a highly modified gsxr 600 supercharged and shoved into a sled chassis. I also got to help when a couple top secret dudes form BP fuels came and tested some additives for gasoline seeing different blends change power output and economy by >20%ZOMGVTEK said:Arlo1 said:The fastest sled I was on was a modified 00 Yamaha SRX. Something like 200HP at the track from what I hear. It was about as fast as you would want a sled to be, until it hits about 80 and starts slowing down. It would easily lift the skis at 60 if you snap the throttle. That kind of power is tricky right now with electric, especially on a smaller platform like that.
Arlo1 said:. As for batteries they could have a charger and keep a bunch extra charged up in the trailer or truck... Most the dudes I know in the industry would gladly drop a couple g for extra batteries to just change them all at home then be good for the weekend just switch them out at the truck or hotel room! They are just weekend warriors
These things dont run at full power for 15 minutes a time. They do a hill climb then cost down. Look at the gas tank sizes... Last I looked they were about 10gal of fuel. Not much more then a sport bike for a full day of riding!Hillhater said:Arlo1 said:. As for batteries they could have a charger and keep a bunch extra charged up in the trailer or truck... Most the dudes I know in the industry would gladly drop a couple g for extra batteries to just change them all at home then be good for the weekend just switch them out at the truck or hotel room! They are just weekend warriors
But... Even a "modest" 50kw machine would need a substantial ( ? 10kWhr ?) pack to run for even a short time ( 15 mins) at high power.
That 10kWhr pack would weigh 60+ kg and cost $4k +.... even using HK lipo !...
.. and i dont think many would be happy with 15mins between 60kg pack changes.![]()
..and recharging .. ??
...so, what, at 36.6 kWh/US gal... a 366kW "pack" if 10gal? What's a "full day"? Eight hours?Arlo1 said:Look at the gas tank sizes... Last I looked they were about 10gal of fuel. Not much more then a sport bike for a full day of riding!
BRP also expands its revolutionary 2-stroke direct injection E-TEC technology with the Rotax 800R E-TEC engine. This lightweight engine delivers up to 37% better fuel economy (19 mi/gal or 12.3L/100km)
Dude most people only put on ~100 k in a killer day of playing in the back country. Where they ride around here is ride up a 15km trail then play in powder and every body take turns or various hill climbs. Even though you spend a lot of time sitting around you are absolutly wiped after a day!! I dont think I have been on a ride in the mountains that was over 150km in a day and that was from 8am till 10pm!!! with not to many brakes just lots of getting stuck in the deepest poweder I have ever seen and the km were mesured by track revalutions!Ypedal said:Ride it like you stole it and 10 gal will not deliver an 8 hr day !!..
edit: random google search:
http://corp.brp.com/en-us/company/news/brps-2011-ski-doo-snowmobile-line-more-market-shaping-fuel-efficient-engine
BRP also expands its revolutionary 2-stroke direct injection E-TEC technology with the Rotax 800R E-TEC engine. This lightweight engine delivers up to 37% better fuel economy (19 mi/gal or 12.3L/100km)
`Kay, so best? case at 36.6 kWh/US gal good for 19miles, then almost 2kWh/mile... (Maybe folks like BRP provide "optimistic" fuel consumption numbers the way the China ebike folks do?)BRP also expands its revolutionary 2-stroke direct injection E-TEC technology with the Rotax 800R E-TEC engine. This lightweight engine delivers up to 37% better fuel economy (19 mi/gal or 12.3L/100km)
No they have frocking amaxing fuel econamy with the direct injection. They needed to keep them clean to pass emissions!Lock said:`Kay, so best? case at 36.6 kWh/US gal good for 19miles, then almost 2kWh/mile... (Maybe folks like BRP provide "optimistic" fuel consumption numbers the way the China ebike folks do?)BRP also expands its revolutionary 2-stroke direct injection E-TEC technology with the Rotax 800R E-TEC engine. This lightweight engine delivers up to 37% better fuel economy (19 mi/gal or 12.3L/100km)
:lol: ..OK so you will "pussy" around on that 50kW m/c ( sport riding ??) and stretch 30 mins out of that battery.Arlo1 said:These things dont run at full power for 15 minutes a time. They do a hill climb then cost down. Look at the gas tank sizes... Last I looked they were about 10gal of fuel. Not much more then a sport bike for a full day of riding!
Im just trying to remember when I was out with one of the bombardier engineers on a ride in revelstoke, I seem to remember coming back to the truck at the end of the day and putting 28$ of gas in and that was premium at 99cents a litre. So about 28 litres 28/4.54= 6.16 gallons. It was not any sort of pussy footing around I was droping 10+ foot cornuses and hitting some pretty decent jumps. That was a day from 8am-~4pm so I realy think you guys are over estimating this all. I think we need to look at what a motorcycle uses for x amout of distance on x amount of fuel and then compare the total kw that zero bike will have for a simular bike and then compare gallons of gas to kwh. I do understand a sled uses a lot of energy at times but its not as bad as you guys think.Hillhater said::lol: ..OK so you will "pussy" around on that 50kW m/c ( sport riding ??) and stretch 30 mins out of that battery.Arlo1 said:These things dont run at full power for 15 minutes a time. They do a hill climb then cost down. Look at the gas tank sizes... Last I looked they were about 10gal of fuel. Not much more then a sport bike for a full day of riding!
how far from you truck full of charged $4k packs will you go, and how many $4k packs will you take for a days .."pussying" around conserving power and trying not to be 1/2 a mile from your "battery station" when the power dies ??
.. I suspect pushing a sled in soft snow is not too easy !
...but then again you could just hike that mile to the truck and back carrying another 60+ kg pack to get going !!