Jeremy Harris said:
...There have been a fair few pack builds pictured here on ES over the years that have worried me, but I've usually been reluctant to wade in and be overly critical, as often the builder has put a lot of work into them. Perhaps we should be more critical of what we see as potentially bad practice. TBH, I just don't know whether the potential benefit from pointing out serious flaws is worth the disruption it might cause to an otherwise peaceful thread.
For what it is worth, I think we should start being as critical as is constructive to help improve the safety of battery designs. I know a lot of us have spent many an hour in design reviews (quoted author included). At least in the reviews I participate in, the focus on "is it right and proper and meets requirements, or does the design need revisions."
Again IMHO we need to develop and disseminate "best practices" for these battery systems. The alternative of "random" fires is not an acceptable outcome. For example, the original design used neopreme rubber likely for insulation, abrasion and shock absorption. If neopreme is not the right choice, what is? We should evolve towards that "best design practice." The only way I know to do that is to assess current designs, and identify suspect weak points. As for folks with thin skin, I know I would rather have my designs openly criticized on this board than have to throw my wife out the bedroom window, follow her, and watch our home burn to the ground because of one of my "experiments." Also, random failures that cause a fire, or shorts that cause a fire, are still failures "that count" in my book and need corrective action in design, material choices, and in fabrication practices.
I said to my wife a week ago, that I wonder if large electric vehicles will prove to be viable or not. I described to her my thought that the battery is a cauldron of angry electrons just trying to get out. And if there is a pinpoint breakdown of a 0.003 in thick insulator (of which there is likely hundreds if not a thousand or two square feet of in a battery system) all those electrons catastrophically escape and call upon their neighbors to break jail also. I added that there would never be an electric car parked in our garage, and any charging would be fifty feet downwind of our house...
For info I am attaching the A123 battery design standards to OEM's. This report was publicly distributed as an appendix to this: REPORT OF INVESTIGATION:
HYBRIDS PLUS PLUG IN
HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Prepared for:
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc.
And
U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho National Laboratory
It presents some design features that A123 feels are mandatory for successful use of their cells. Some directly carry over to LiPo.
These statements are particulary germane:
- Pack must have dual, redundant over voltage protection, with at least protection by hardware and one via software
- The voltage of every single series element must be measured and monitored
- in multi cell batteries, use cell balancing and/or individual cell voltage controls to equalize the state of charge of cells in series.
Bottom line: Bulk charging without individual cell monitoring is unsafe, period.