Moped brakes on Giant DH Comp

crusoe

100 W
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Messages
191
Location
Ottawa, Ontario
I've decided to pitch my mountain bike brakes and was thinking of buying some moped brakes. The cost of upper end mtb hydro disc brakes is just retarded! I've found these http://www.partsforscooters.com/Hydraulic_brake_front?sc=2&category=77226# mentioned a few times on the forums.

I love the fact they're only $50 a piece. But question is, can I just buy two of the front brakes? If you look at the rearhttp://www.partsforscooters.com/Hydraulic-Brake-Kit?sc=2&category=77226, you'll see that they are normally all pedal operated, that's why I ask if it would work to just use two front brakes so I get the normal two brake levers on the bar.

I'm assuming there will be quite a bit of hacking to get them to fit on my bike, so any insight/advice from those of you who have made the switch would be great!
 
crusoe said:
I've decided to pitch my mountain bike brakes and was thinking of buying some moped brakes. The cost of upper end mtb hydro disc brakes is just retarded! I've found these http://www.partsforscooters.com/Hydraulic_brake_front?sc=2&category=77226# mentioned a few times on the forums.

I love the fact they're only $50 a piece. But question is, can I just buy two of the front brakes? If you look at the rearhttp://www.partsforscooters.com/Hydraulic-Brake-Kit?sc=2&category=77226, you'll see that they are normally all pedal operated, that's why I ask if it would work to just use two front brakes so I get the normal two brake levers on the bar.

I'm assuming there will be quite a bit of hacking to get them to fit on my bike, so any insight/advice from those of you who have made the switch would be great!

As long as you use a sufficiently long hose for the back brake, there shouldn't be any problem in principle with using two front brakes. Note that many M/C brakes are designed to mount on the front edge of the fork blade rather than behind.

You'll probably need a relatively elaborate bracket to reconcile the lateral distance from locknut face to rotor mounting surface, which is different front to rear for bicycles. A bicycle rotor is about half as thick as a moped rotor, so you may have to disassemble and mill down the caliper to match the thinner rotor, or else have thicker rotors custom made.

It seems like a big lot of trouble and expense just to avoid using cheap, lightweight, reliable and effective linear-pull brakes with good pads and booster arches.

Chalo
 
Good advice! I didn't know about the front mounting vs rear mount caliper problem - that would present HUGE amounts of work to get it working correctly. I have looked at the mech disc brakes, but the census seems to be a lot less modulation and slightly less stopping power. Those reasons alone are making me shy away from mech brakes.
 
Sorry,
You will have a problem running that brake on the left side bar. The resovoir is set up to be on top when installed on the right bar (front brake on motorcycles & scooters)

I use that exact front brake on my bicycles...its a simple adapter to fab to make the mounting unit. Works fine on standard bicycle rotors.(Unless your pushing the speeds up & racing them....then the rotors turn blue & get wonky really fast)

I use a cheap mechanical on the rear wheel...it locks up easily especialy when clamping down on the front binder.
 
You could use a left handle bar mounted master cylinder designed for clutch use for the rear brake, there are a lot of small ones of these available.
 
crusoe said:
Good advice! I didn't know about the front mounting vs rear mount caliper problem - that would present HUGE amounts of work to get it working correctly. I have looked at the mech disc brakes, but the census seems to be a lot less modulation and slightly less stopping power. Those reasons alone are making me shy away from mech brakes.

"Modulation" is a poorly defined term that basically means "feel". Feel doesn't stop you faster, and hydraulics only have one feel that can't be tuned. I got my first pair of hydraulic brakes in the early 90s when that implied Magura rim brakes, and I got my first Mountain Cycle Pro-Stop cable/hydraulic discs about the same time, so I've had a lot of time to get my head around what hydraulics and discs do and don't do. I started working as a bicycle mechanic in 1992, so I've gotten a pretty good overview since then.

Having had up to 450 pounds rolling on my normal pedal only bikes, and over 500 pounds on my e-bikes (and over 3200 pounds on my pedal powered parade machines), I have had plenty of opportunity to sort out myth from facts when it comes to braking. Here are some of the things I've learned:

Disc brake power is mostly a function of rotor size and pad material. There are cheap and horrible OEM calipers that waste the opportunity to deliver decent braking, but the cable-pulled Avid BB7 and its predecessor the Avid Mechanical disc are every bit as powerful as hydraulic brakes when set up with equal pads. Using their Speed Dial levers and carefully laying out and prepping cable housings gives you a lot of command over the feel and reactivity of the system, as does switching between different pad compounds. I like EBC Gold pads.

Cantilever and linear-pull brakes can be stronger than any discs. Really. They have 22" to 25" rotors with way more heat capacity and conductivity than disc rotors. There are more variables to be controlled and things to be adjusted in order to make rim brakes perform at their best, but it's no harder than keeping a bike index shifting crisply. Booster arches help, as do Kool Stop pads, high quality cables and careful setup. Linear-pull brakes are much easier to set up than cantilevers, so they are more likely to deliver powerful braking.

When hydraulic brakes have a problem, it usually causes a safety issue and often diminishes braking to zero on the affected wheel. Analogous problems with cable brakes usually cause progressive degradation of braking and are often fully addressable on the roadside or trailside. Hydraulic systems can't generally be serviced on the road and often not even in an ordinary bike shop! Many hydraulic systems require special fittings to do routine maintenance and special tools and proprietary parts to do major repairs. In my shop, fixing a rim brake or a mechanical disc is usually a while-you-wait repair, but fixing a hydraulic brake is always a scheduled repair that usually has to wait for special ordered items to arrive.

Disc rotors are less in harm's way than rims, but they are much more fragile. More often than not, they can't be repaired satisfactorily when damaged and thus must be replaced.

Users are generally more oblivious about how to set up and adjust cable-pulled disc calipers than they are about rim brakes. So even though mechanical discs are lower maintenance items in principle, they seem to be in disarray at least as much of the time as rim brakes. And hydraulics leave most users utterly helpless to do anything to rectify their brakes when it's necessary.

Hydraulic disc brakes on bicycles are the brake equivalent of proprietary package wheels-- set up well from the factory, but much more difficult and time consuming to service, more dependent on proprietary parts and supplies, and much more expensive than the conventional equivalent. Disc brakes weigh a lot more than rim brakes, too, and cause weaker yet heavier wheels. They'll leave your bike out of service more of the time and cost you more all the way along. And when it comes down to it, they do not work any better than the real thing-- they just look and feel a little different. Maybe that's worth it to you, but not to me.

I use disc brakes on bikes with such fat tires that they don't play well with rim brakes. I would use hydraulics for a machine that had such a long, crooked route between the levers and the brakes that cables didn't work well. Otherwise, why bother?

Chalo
 
Great post Chalo... I'd upvote this if I could!
 
Excellent, well thought out post, indeed! Unfortunately with our DH Comp there isn't any pre-existing mount points for anything other than disc brakes. But you do bring up some very good points in favor of cable disc brakes. Maybe I'll head to the LBS and see if they have any I can try out for myself. The price point of cable discs makes it a very very attractive option. Not only that, I've experienced the complete loss of braking power with my hydro's at 60km/h and that's not fun - my shoes didn't like it too much either :p

So the Avid BB7's seem to be the popular choice for cable discs. Time to research more!
 
teklektik said:
Chalo said:
Disc brakes ... cause weaker yet heavier wheels.
Please explain this.

Rim-braked front wheels are symmetrical, with widely spaced flanges. Disc-braked front wheels are dished (asymmetrical), which makes them weaker in two ways: First, spoke tension is different between one side and the other, with the tight side only as tight as both sides of a symmetrical wheel. Since the tension in spokes is what carries the load, inconsistencies in tension weaken the wheel. Second, the flanges of the hub are closer together, with at least one of them closer to the wheel center plane than those of a symmetrical wheel. So the spokes have shorter lever arms through which to stabilize the rim, and are less able to do so.

Here's an exaggerated diagram of a dished wheel. In this case you can imagine a brake rotor and rotor mount taking the place of the part labeled "cog" in this diagram.
dishcalc.png


Disc-braked rear wheels are a little less asymmetrical than rim-braked wheels, so the spoke tension imbalance is less of an issue. But the flange lateral spacing ("H" in the diagram) is much smaller, all else equal, than that of a rim braked rear wheel. Therefore disc rear wheels have less lateral stiffness and stability than rim braked rear wheels when built with components of equal integrity.

Stacked on top of these issues is the fact that braking torque in a disc braked wheel is passed as a twisting force through the hub and spokes, when it is resolved entirely within the rim of a rim braked wheel. That means the hub must be much stronger and heavier to compensate, and the spokes see larger forces more often. The same issue is why Buell and other motorcycle manufacturers have resorted to rim-mounted disc rotors-- so that they can dramatically lighten up the wheel, because it no longer must carry braking torque from the disc, through the hub and spokes, to the rim:
6132_20100717141259_L.jpg


Chalo
 
Back
Top