weoner said:
...well so the cheapest one will only do 75 amps continuous so that means I can't achieve highway speeds, however the next one up will do 150 amps continuous...
Andrew
It is wise to be at least a little skeptical of the Kelly Controller ratings, and not to buy one for an application at or even close to the upper limit of claimed output. I don't want to start this entire conversation over again here- you can find it at exhaustive length, and contributed to by employees of Kelly, over at the DIY Electric Car Forums- in more than one thread. Its fair to say that Kelly controllers, historically, simply did not deliver claimed amperage. There's a big debate about whether they have been redesigned, upgraded, or somehow otherwise more accurately rated. The most prudent thing to do is consider the ratings a little (or a lot) optimistic, particularly the continuous ratings, and buy accordingly.
If I were sizing a Kelly Controller for, say, a 96V pack of 60Ah Thunder Sky batteries, with regen, I'd probably choose the KBL12601I. Yes, at $1400 that probably isn't what you wanted to hear, but if you really intend to drive the motor with the amps that such a pack can deliver, that "600A" controller can do it. The $1000 "400A" unit just below it in the Kelly range probably cannot, and the $700 "270A" unit below that certainly cannot. Remember, you have to cool this controller, too. The higher rated unit should also be more resistant to thermal cutback, which is what the fudge in the ratings is largely about.
Mark very likely has his own recommendations, but my point is simply that it isn't a very good idea to spec a Kelly (or almost any) controller to operate near its max rated output.
HTH,
TomA