Auhydride
1 mW
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2009
- Messages
- 11
Hello,
I have a question, searched about it on the forum,
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8226&hilit=paralleling
Basicly, I will have 24 a123 lifepo4 cells and need them in 8 series.
I wanted to parallel them as 3 cell formations first before connecting them in series, thinking It would be easier to balance up 8 cells, instead of 24, would need less multi voltage meters to track them all too.
But an electronics guy that works in the same project insists it will cause batteries to charge each other up and waste energy. But I don't see any reason for them to go out of balance in the first place as I discharge them.
There is also this:
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2872&hilit=+parallel
I don't really get it, does this happen because of the reason here:?
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=3482&hilit=parallel
But other than this, are there any practical issues for "buddy pairing" batteries? What would be the final word on this?
Thanks
I have a question, searched about it on the forum,
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8226&hilit=paralleling
"You can create self balancing (self correcting) behavior if you place cells in parallel with each other before you connect them in series and that helps to erase the manufacturer defects.
But in absolute terms all cells drain the same energy... the cells at the front of the series and at the end drain the same amount.
If you are really interested in doing the best thing possible you would mate up the strong cells with the weak cells in a parallel situation so that on average the result is "average". But that's more effort."
Basicly, I will have 24 a123 lifepo4 cells and need them in 8 series.
I wanted to parallel them as 3 cell formations first before connecting them in series, thinking It would be easier to balance up 8 cells, instead of 24, would need less multi voltage meters to track them all too.
But an electronics guy that works in the same project insists it will cause batteries to charge each other up and waste energy. But I don't see any reason for them to go out of balance in the first place as I discharge them.
There is also this:
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2872&hilit=+parallel
"I did some more investigating and I think I understand why this is a bad idea. It seems with cells built in parallel, like my proposed 1s4p pack, it would be perfectly fine to charge each 1s4p pack alone. This was actually where I was heading, I was going to get fifteen of the 2A wall chargers so that each 1s4p pack would have its own charger. I could just disconnect the series connections and plug in the chargers to each pack. If I then connect these packs in series for my 15s4p configuration to discharge the packs and I have a bad cell in one of the parallel strings it will not show up as a voltage loss but it will have a loss in capacity. Over time this would probably destroy the entire 1s4p pack before I could spot the problem. It looks like I need to keep them in series first and get the desired voltage and then connect them in parallel to get the desired capacity."
I don't really get it, does this happen because of the reason here:?
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=3482&hilit=parallel
So it would happen because weaker cells in the parallel wouldn't be contributing and eventually causing the buddy cells to discharge at higher currents and shortening their life. And because they are in parallel, you can't easy monitor them to see which one reaches cut off voltage sooner, etc."For practical purposes you do want to match the capacities with the same size cells to maximize the cycle life & performance.
The bigger battery will be carrying the brunt of the full load once the smaller one stops contributing current & will tend to wear out faster.
I wouldn't characterize it in terms of safe or unsafe."
But other than this, are there any practical issues for "buddy pairing" batteries? What would be the final word on this?
Thanks