Pico Fuses to Protect BMS

rg12

100 kW
Joined
Jul 26, 2014
Messages
1,596
I have seen an old vid on YouTube documenting the production of battery packs for a certain manufacturer and they had pico fuses on the BMS balance wires.
I was wandering from what scenario they might protect the BMS from?
Do they add any type of other protection besides protecting the BMS?
I was wandering, the smallest I've found are 2A pico fuses, will they protect my BMS if the balance current of the BMS is 60mA?
 
The fuse it to protect against two balance wires shorting, or shorting to the battery at a higher potential. A great idea, but it does add weight and clutter to the BMS if not done elegantly.
 
I use small 4 amp glass fuses they look like the pico fuses. Recently I wired a 4s connector wrong, luckily the glass fuse blew. No damage to the bms or the wire. I never used them before but now I add them to all my packs.
Your 2 amp fuses should be ok, most balance charges are in the 1.2 amp range, rare to see one in the 2 amp range. I use the 4 amp ones because I had alot of those, those will protect against a short.
 
Why would shorting balance wires with eachother/to the pack be any potential if the pack is closed and all is padded around the wires and done professionally?
It's not that the wires are located outside of the pack that the customer can mess with
 
rg12 said:
Why would shorting balance wires with eachother/to the pack be any potential if the pack is closed and all is padded around the wires and done professionally?
It's not that the wires are located outside of the pack that the customer can mess with

If the wires are really done right, then there isn't much chance of them shorting. A part on the BMS board could short though.
What happens more frequently is the wires aren't really done properly and have insulation failures from vibration and rubbing over time. Also consider what might happen if your bike tips over or crashes. The likelihood of this happening is significant.

In practice, if you short something on the balance wires, the wire itself acts like a fuse and goes open pretty fast. It may or may not start a fire in the process.

I've seen a BMS where they used PTCs instead of pico fuses. PTCs will self reset once a short is cleared. They also have much higher resistance than a fuse, so could cause voltage errors at the board.
 
fuses on balance wires is generally a bad thing with the cheap bms used here.
breaking a fuse usually means something went REALLY wrong and will cause a cascading effect with the other balance wires if you are unlucky so the entire bms burns down.
on high end bms you might want them depending on the measuring circuit. bit its still guilding the lily in terms of electrical design.

personally i would not protect the balancing circuit and if something happens you need a LOT of power onto a single component so you know for sure it blows up and breaks the short and protects the rest of the battery.
 
jonescg said:
The fuse it to protect against two balance wires shorting, or shorting to the battery at a higher potential. A great idea, but it does add weight and clutter to the BMS if not done elegantly.

I have been doing this for over a year. Very tiny package.

Got header plugs and all. Picofused every BMS wire for safety. No problems after a year+. Peace of mind. I know if there is a failure in any wire in or out of the BMS I will not have a fire or a over discharge event.
 
Keep in mind that this type of fuses has a non negligible resistance, which equates more overall power losses. Best way to protect against balancing wire shorts in my opinion is having those wire run ABOVE a kapton layer taped on top of your cells. You than scratch a small piece off wherever you need to solder the end of the balancing wire, keeping the entire wire length insulated from the cells. Should one brake or melt, no risk of shorting another cell. Also a good overall practice is to tape / fasten / glue the wires to reduce possible movement to a minimum in case of failure.
 
qwerkus said:
Keep in mind that this type of fuses has a non negligible resistance, which equates more overall power losses. Best way to protect against balancing wire shorts in my opinion is having those wire run ABOVE a kapton layer taped on top of your cells. You than scratch a small piece off wherever you need to solder the end of the balancing wire, keeping the entire wire length insulated from the cells. Should one brake or melt, no risk of shorting another cell. Also a good overall practice is to tape / fasten / glue the wires to reduce possible movement to a minimum in case of failure.

This is kind of what I did. I did actually datalog the difference in cell IR vs a balance cable with none. I found negligible change in resistance in the logs. I did test short circuit breaking action too, they work good and break the circuit if there is any serious potential of wiring being damaged or BMS failure at a catastrophic level. Close to the battery as possible, between the BMS and the cells, there is wire, traveling into no-mans ( where a damage might occur) land, so that wire is fused.

I mean, the bluetooth BMS can instantly tell me if something is wrong before fire when I see one cell group is gone. Never happened for me though. Fact of the matter, a damaged balance harness can absolutly potentially short to another in the BMS harness or pack voltage potential and has enough power to melt the wire and create a fire hazzard.. given high high power and currents these batteries are capable of....and I figured it would be a good idea to protec.

I did test. Parts: 1 DIP switch board, littlefuses, and a few header. Less than a dolla. Each board holds 7 hots and a ground. Im not a EE at all but I did experiment. I wanted to build batteries with very short balance leads and leave the lead on the charger. I dont like JST... at all. They are the weakest link in the entire battery chain... everything else is bolted. Just a dolla in off the shelf component. This way I only have about 1/2 inch of balance lead from the lipo I build... I have used on both hobby charged packs and BMS managed packs.


Plus, if you are not charging wimpy 18650 packs, and are charging high output (say...NMC) cells, you can take advantage of a heavier BMS harness wire (>24g) and higher (>6a) current to balance per cell, something to consider when charging over 2C.... quickly.





In practice, if you short something on the balance wires, the wire itself acts like a fuse and goes open pretty fast. It may or may not start a fire in the process.
....


(but what if you have a big, big, balance wire (>18ga) that can take some serious current and her output before fusing?)

fuses on balance wires is generally a bad thing with the cheap bms used here.
breaking a fuse usually means something went REALLY wrong and will cause a cascading effect with the other balance wires if you are unlucky so the entire bms burns down.
( this stops all high current fault flow.. and the system just reports a dead string... easily monitored.. lol... )

personally i would not protect the balancing circuit and if something happens you need a LOT of power onto a single component so you know for sure it blows up and breaks the short and protects the rest of the batter

... snt this the reason for a "distributed BMS" vs a "non distributed"BMS, and all the advantages that go along with each system? IDK... ?

The board in the corner of the picture would hold 32 balance wires, for 32 cells, with 32 fuses. No current would be catastrophic if the battery would go out of its "safe operation area" and begin to give current into the balance lines over designed spec.


IDK I thought picofuses WERE/ARE PTC type fuses? IDK I might be wrong.
 

Attachments

  • picofused.jpg
    picofused.jpg
    134 KB · Views: 625
Back
Top