ZapPat
10 kW
voicecoils said:Anyways, I only used 0.26Ah but here is what the CA repots:
Max Amps: 33.93 A
Min Volts: 66.6 V
Assuming max amps and min volts occurred at the same time, I hit a peak of 2.26kW. Probably the case, as I did see ~2.15kW up a steep hill.
Resting pack voltage 5min afterwards: 79.9 V (starting from 87.9 V hot off the charger)
Assuming the numbers are right, 66.6v / 24 cells = 2.775V/C at ~3.4C discharge rate.
Maybe you should do a load test using two different loads, because so far these cells may look like they have the characteristics of the old cells, meaning over 11-13 milli-ohms per cell. The only good results we've seen are from "biggs" forum member, and he has only posted 5 times in all, and not since the last page of this thread. Are you still here, biggs, and how are your cells doing in real life?
However, there are quite a few variables that could seriously through off the results of my quick calculations: Beginning of discharge (surface charge), use of only one voltage/current point, unsure if current and voltage figures were took at the same operation point...
I used your 79.9V float voltage (at 0 amps) along with the 66.6V at 34A to get an idea of the internal resistance. I reduced the float voltage down to 78V just to reduce some of the unavoidable error produced by using a no-load (0A) point. So...
R = (78V - 66.6V) / 34A
R =~ 335mOhms (for the pack)
Rcell =~ 335/24 =~ 14mohms per cell.... ugg!
Of course the BMS introduces some resistance itself, but it should not be too high since it is supposedly made to support high current discharges.
Now if we could see a good two-point operation test of these new headway batts, it could either confirm this mediocre result or (we hope) bash it into the ground.