e-beach said:When you say you are trying to increase the width of your torque arms, do you mean increase the width of your existing bicycle dropouts?
What material is you torque arms? Steel?
It would be eaisier if you showed us photographs of what you have.
I tend to use my Dremel tool and hand files when I expand the dropouts on my frames.
![]()
![]()
RTLSHIP said:By grinding down (unknown quality metal) the inner flats, you will create space for the 12 mm. But you are likely going to have a weaker torque arm. Pony up and buy a 12mm flat torque arm. This seems like the safe and easy way. Online you can get one for maybe $20 or 25 and have it by March 1 or 2. Oddly, I bought a 10 mm torque arm on ebay last year and it apparently came from Ukraine I recall. It was about $15 free shipping and I waited 6 weeks. It is a cheaper quality steel mixture but works fine.
Audisport09 said:Hello, I want to change from QS205 = 10mm to QS273 = 12mm flats
f9aa45d1d14dd07c29c1ffe2228e0fd9.jpg
I guess what I was wondering was how hard would it be to change the drawing so that I can get it cut. I don't know how to do CAD work.
E-HP said:Audisport09 said:Hello, I want to change from QS205 = 10mm to QS273 = 12mm flats
f9aa45d1d14dd07c29c1ffe2228e0fd9.jpg
I guess what I was wondering was how hard would it be to change the drawing so that I can get it cut. I don't know how to do CAD work.
In the pic, the "torque arms" actually appear to be functioning as dropouts, since the dropouts appear to have been sheared off of the frame. Is this also the case for your bike, or are they purely being used as torque arms? (if so, you'll need more fasteners to bolt them to the frame).
e-beach said:The specs I have looked at say 16mm x 12mm. I believe that to mean a 16mm axle radius that has been reduced to 12mm on the flats.
Audisport09 said:I want to change from QS205 = 10mm to QS273 = 12mm flats
f9aa45d1d14dd07c29c1ffe2228e0fd9.jpg
Audisport09 said:Sorry just to clarify, non of the pictures in this thread are mine. I just copied the torque arm design. Thanks for the help guys. Trying to hunt down an appropriate size file. They never state the width, just length.
Yes. That is a bloody awful drawing. Color choices alone should get someone horsewhipped.Audisport09 said:Ideally I want the same shape torque arm but bigger. Any one know anything about cad?
The specs I looked at said 10mm said across the flats.e-beach said:The specs I have looked at say 16mm x 12mm.
If you don't have the motor, wait ...
Chalo said:Audisport09 said:Sorry just to clarify, non of the pictures in this thread are mine. I just copied the torque arm design. Thanks for the help guys. Trying to hunt down an appropriate size file. They never state the width, just length.
If this is the motor you're discussing, the axle is 14mm thread with 10mm flats.
LewTwo said:Yes. That is a bloody awful drawing. Color choices alone should get someone horsewhipped.Audisport09 said:Ideally I want the same shape torque arm but bigger. Any one know anything about cad?
Here is what I think it is supposed to be. I had to guess at the inside radius's of the cutouts.
Dropout 10mm.jpg
From what I can guess, you have two control points shown in yellow.
The dimensions for those are in red.
The orange dimensions are reference and should not be used in actual fabrication.
The specs I looked at said 10mm said across the flats.e-beach said:The specs I have looked at say 16mm x 12mm.
If you don't have the motor, wait ...
I think waiting to get the motor and checking the axle dimensions is an excellent idea. :thumb:
The attached Zip file has a 2D DWG Cad file and and a 1:1 vector PDF file.
NO ... just accurate measurements.Audisport09 said:Doesn’t CAD need a checkered background of some sort?
Yes I can and no you can not.Audisport09 said:Can you edit it for QS273 40h and I will pay you for your troubles.
Yes, but I have to guess at the locations. Does this look about right?Audisport09 said:I also had 2 (M8s) holes added. Are you able to add to your drawing?
That would be wise. Making a hole smaller is a lot more difficult than making it larger.Audisport09 said:I guess I can wait until the motor arrives.
Thank you so much for the help, much appreciated. That looks good, as long as they in that general area, I could always make some adjustments. Ok, I will wait but I’m 99% percent sure based on research I’ve done on here. Do these pictures help?LewTwo said:NO ... just accurate measurements.Audisport09 said:Doesn’t CAD need a checkered background of some sort?
Yes I can and no you can not.Audisport09 said:Can you edit it for QS273 40h and I will pay you for your troubles.
I do CAD drawings because I enjoy it.
Yes, but I have to guess at the locations. Does this look about right?Audisport09 said:I also had 2 (M8s) holes added. Are you able to add to your drawing?
Capture.jpg
That would be wise. Making a hole smaller is a lot more difficult than making it larger.Audisport09 said:I guess I can wait until the motor arrives.
Getting it right the first time is better yet.
Audisport09 said:
Rounding that inside corner would also alleviate the stress riser.E-HP said:What's the purpose of all of that additional material above the 90 degree section in the photo above. Does it align with something on the frame to provide additional support? It didn't look like it in the example photo. If id doesn't, and you're making changes anyway, maybe some of it can be trimmed down.
E-HP said:What's the purpose of all of that additional material above the 90 degree section in the photo above. Does it align with something on the frame to provide additional support? It didn't look like it in the example photo. If id doesn't, and you're making changes anyway, maybe some of it can be trimmed down.
This version of the motor states 12mm axle flats, but also requires motorcycle disc brakes, but I've seen the 16mm axle in a few listings for the 8kW version of the motor.
http://www.cnqsmotor.com/en/article_read/QS%20273%208kW%20E-Motorcycle%20Spoke%20Hub%20Motor%20Conversion%20kits%20with%2072V110KPH%20top%20speed/842.html
LewTwo said:Rounding that inside corner would also alleviate the stress riser.E-HP said:What's the purpose of all of that additional material above the 90 degree section in the photo above. Does it align with something on the frame to provide additional support? It didn't look like it in the example photo. If id doesn't, and you're making changes anyway, maybe some of it can be trimmed down.
I believe the important measurements for fabricating the modified TA would be what is analogous to the 90 mm measurement in the diagram, but for the center of each of the other two mounting/anchoring holes. None of the photos or sketches captures those measurements very well.Audisport09 said:Comrade said:Audisport09 said:
A flatbed scanner would be much better for what you are trying to relay. Photo lenses have significant distortion.
Really? Like so?
EPSON002.JPG
EPSON003.JPG