MitchJi
10 MW
Hi Matt,
Want to start a thread (after September 12) with the new proposed design
? If it includes an enclosure, has the advantages you state and the cost isn't prohibitive I don't know why anyone would choose a V3.
Sounds good! I think a chain/belt enclosure is a compelling option and I think its possible to come up with a design in which the enclosure and drive are integrated in such a way that its simpler and hopefully cheaper than a V3 plus an add-on case.recumpence said:I can tell you that I am looking at a second drive unit design right now. I would still offer the V3 drive, while offering a second style drive that would be more compact, narrower Q factor, lighter, more rigid, fewer parts, better looking, and allow for MUCH better heat dissipation. It would look completely different than V3 drive. In fact, it would not share a single part of the V3 drive or resemble it in any way what-so-ever. This design does have its drawbacks, though. I am trying to eliminate those drawbacks before taking it to the prototype stage.
Matt
Want to start a thread (after September 12) with the new proposed design