A123 Technology and Chinese Manufacturing

flathill

100 kW
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
1,281
MOD Edit: I split these posts off of Dr. Bass's A123 Group buy thread here: http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=37955&p=553400#p553400

This topic is worthy of discussion, but need not be connected with Dr. Bass's well executed group buy. Let's keep them separate, and carry on.

All the best,
bigMoose
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


You are not buying the cells from a123
A123 is just another middle man now
You are getting them factory direct out the back door

Risks Associated With Doing Business Internationally and Specifically in China and Korea
Our substantial international operations subject us to a number of risks, including unfavorable political, regulatory, labor and tax conditions.
We have significant manufacturing facilities and operations in China and Korea that are subject to the legal, political, regulatory and social requirements and economic conditions in these jurisdictions. In addition, we expect to sell a significant portion of our products to customers located outside the United States. Risks inherent to international operations and sales, include, but are not limited to, the following:
• difficulty in enforcing agreements, judgments and arbitration awards in foreign legal systems;
• state ownership and/or support of competitive business entities;
• fluctuations in exchange rates may affect product demand and may adversely affect our profitability in U.S. dollars to the extent the cost of raw materials and labor is denominated in a foreign currency;
• impediments to the flow of foreign exchange capital payments and receipts due to exchange controls instituted by certain foreign governments and the fact that the local currencies of these countries are not freely convertible;
• inability to obtain, maintain or enforce intellectual property rights;
• changes in general economic and political conditions;
• changes in foreign government regulations and technical standards, including additional regulation of rechargeable batteries, power technology, or the transport of lithium or phosphate, which may reduce or eliminate our ability to sell or license in certain markets;
• requirements or preferences of foreign nations for domestic products could reduce demand for our products;
• trade barriers such as export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other restrictions and expenses, which could increase the prices of our products and make us less competitive; and
• longer payment cycles typically associated with international sales and potential difficulties in collecting accounts receivable, which may reduce the future profitability of foreign sales.
Our business in foreign jurisdictions requires us to respond to rapid changes in market conditions in these countries. Our overall success as a global business depends on our ability to succeed in different legal, regulatory, economic, social and political situations and conditions. We may not be able to develop and implement effective policies and strategies in each foreign jurisdiction where we do business. Also, each of the foregoing risks will likely take on increased significance as we implement plans to expand foreign manufacturing operations.
Since many of our products are manufactured in China, we own and lease manufacturing facilities in China and the Chinese market is of growing importance for our products, we face risks if China loses normal trade relations status with the United States or if US-China trade relations are otherwise adversely impacted.
We manufacture and export our products from China and own and lease manufacturing facilities in China. We also sell our products in China. Our products sold in the United States have normal trade relations status and are currently not subject to United States import duties. As a result of opposition to certain policies of the Chinese government and China's growing trade surpluses with the United States, there has been, and in the future may be, opposition to normal trade relations status with China. The United States Congress may also introduce China trade legislation targeting currency manipulation, which may adversely affect our business in China. The loss of normal trade relations
51status for China, changes in current tariff structures or adoption in the United States of other trade policies adverse to China, and any retaliatory measures that impact our products in the Chinese market, could have an adverse effect on our business.
A change in exchange rates mandated by legislation could negatively impact the cost of imported raw materials and products.
Furthermore, our business and operations may be adversely affected by deterioration of the diplomatic and political relationships between the United States and China. If the relationship between the United States and China were to materially deteriorate, it could negatively impact our ability to control our operations and relationships in China, enforce any agreements we have with Chinese partners or otherwise deal with any assets or investments we may have in China.
Our ongoing manufacturing operations in China are complex and having these remote operations may divert management's attention, lead to disruptions in operations, delay implementation of our business strategy and make it difficult to establish adequate management and financial controls in China. Our plans to grow our business to include sales to Chinese customers may necessitate additional management attention to establishing and maintaining one or more joint venture relationships with Chinese parties.
Currently, we have significant manufacturing operations in China, including a joint venture. We may not be able to find or retain suitable employees in China and we may have to train personnel to perform necessary functions for our manufacturing, senior management and development operations. This may divert management's attention, lead to disruptions in operations and delay implementation of our business strategy, all of which could negatively impact our profitability.
China has only recently begun to adopt management and financial reporting concepts and practices like those with which investors in the United States are familiar. We may have difficulty in hiring and retaining employees in China who have the experience necessary to implement the kind of management and financial controls that are expected of a United States public company. If we cannot establish and implement such controls, we may experience difficulty in collecting financial data and preparing financial statements, books of account and corporate records and instituting business practices that meet U.S. standards.
In order to grow our business and sales to Chinese customers we have entered into a Chinese-foreign joint venture with a Chinese partner. A Chinese-foreign joint venture can be a complex business arrangement requiring substantial management attention to the joint venture relationship. The joint venture will also require capital contributions and due to China's foreign exchange controls, uncertainty as to the ability to repatriate profits and principal out of China. Our plans to grow our business to include sales to Chinese customers may require additional management attention to establishing and maintaining additional joint venture relationships with Chinese parties.
Because of the relative weakness of the Chinese legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, we may not be able to enforce intellectual property rights in China.
The legal regime protecting intellectual property rights in China is weak. Because the Chinese legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, are relatively weak, it is often difficult to create and enforce intellectual property rights in China. Accordingly, we may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights in China against business entities, individuals and current and former employees.
52
**********************Enforcing agreements and laws in China is difficult and may be impossible because China does not have a comprehensive system of laws.**********************
We depend on our relationships with our Chinese manufacturing partners and suppliers. In China, enforcement of contractual agreements may be sporadic, and implementation and interpretation of laws may be inconsistent. The Chinese judiciary is relatively inexperienced in interpreting agreements and enforcing China's laws, leading to a higher than usual degree of uncertainty as to the outcome of any litigation. Even where adequate law exists in China, it may not be possible to obtain swift and equitable enforcement of such law, or to obtain enforcement of a judgment or an arbitration award by a court of another jurisdiction.
The government of China may change or even reverse its policies of promoting private industry and foreign investment, in which case our assets and operations may be at risk.
Our existing and planned operations in China are subject to risks related to the business, economic and political conditions in China, which include the possibility that the central government of China will change or even reverse its policies of promoting private industry and foreign investment in China. The government of China has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every section of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. Many of the current reforms which support private business in China are of recent origin or provisional in nature. Other political, economic and social factors, such as political changes, changes in the rates of economic growth, unemployment or inflation, or in the disparities of per capita wealth among citizens of China and between regions within China, could also lead to further readjustment of the government's reform measures. It is not possible to predict whether the Chinese government will continue to be as supportive of private business in China, nor is it possible to predict how any future reforms will affect our business. For example, if the government were to limit the number of foreign personnel who could work in the country, substantially increase taxes on foreign businesses, eliminate export processing zones, restrict the transportation of goods in and out of the country, adopt policies favoring competitors or impose other restrictions on our operations, the impact may be significant.
Significantly, a reversal of current liberalizations of foreign exchange controls by the Chinese government could be disruptive and costly to our cross- border operations and our business as a whole.
Business practices in China and Korea may entail greater risk and dependence upon the personal relationships of senior management than is common in North America, and therefore some of our agreements with other parties in China and Korea could be difficult or impossible to enforce.
The business cultures of China and Korea are, in some respects, different from the business cultures in Western countries and may present some difficulty for Western investors reviewing contractual relationships among companies in China and Korea and evaluating the merits of an investment. Personal and family relationships among business principals of companies and business entities in China and Korea are very significant in their business cultures. In some cases, because so much reliance is based upon personal relationships, written contracts among businesses in China and Korea may be less detailed and specific than is commonly accepted for similar written agreements in Western countries. In some cases, material terms of an understanding are not contained in the written agreement but exist as oral agreements only. In other cases, the terms of transactions which may involve material amounts of money are not documented at all. In addition, in contrast to Western business practices where a written agreement specifically defines the terms, rights and obligations of the parties in a legally-binding and enforceable manner, the parties to a written agreement in China or Korea may view that agreement more as a starting point for an ongoing business relationship which will evolve and require ongoing modification. As a result, written agreements in China or Korea may appear to the Western reader to look more like outline agreements that precede a formal written agreement. While these documents may appear incomplete or unenforceable to a Western reader, the
parties to the agreement in China or Korea may feel that they have a more complete understanding than is apparent to someone who is only reading the written agreement without having attended the negotiations. As a result, contractual arrangements in China and Korea may be more difficult to review and understand.
 
:shock: .. Sorry, I did not took time to read everything... :lol:

I hope you understand...

C'mon! why did you posted all that instead of a simple link to that info :roll:

This thread intend to be constructive! :wink:

Doc
 
Off topic




Now, A123 has five plants in China, COINCEDENTALY located in Chiang's father's hometown of Changzhou, about two hours' drive west of Shanghai. Chiang remembers visiting relatives there a year ago; their village didn't have roads yet.

BOSTON -- Yet-Ming Chiang relishes his 20-mile drive to work. His hybrid car gets more than 100 miles per gallon, recharges by plugging into a regular wall outlet, and purrs so quietly that it's his favorite place for making important phone calls.

But what makes Chiang's ordinary-looking beige Toyota Prius even more special is that it's powered by a break-through battery he invented himself and is working to turn into the kind of high-tech, green, "Made in America" product that many see as the key to the nation's economic future.

Safer and more long-lasting than conventional lithium-ion car batteries, the 52-year old MIT professor's invention packs 600 cells into a case the size of an airplane carry-on bag. His technology has already transformed the batteries used in many cordless power tools.

So why are Chiang and his company, A123 Systems, having trouble moving to full-scale commercial production and creating thousands of new American jobs with his better mousetrap?

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/08/business/la-fi-green-manufacturing-20100509

The company did what it could to slow the technology transfer by breaking down the manufacturing process into steps, Riley said, but "we ended up having to teach these guys how to make our state-of-the-art, world-class batteries...And some of them are [now] competing with us directly."


Chiang is from taiwan :wink:

The funniest part is a123 only licenses its tech from texas
The guy who invented modern lithium good..
Fcuk the patent system
Modern companies dont even use it
As it has lost its purpose





Suckers
Go USA
 
strange posts from flathill, offtopic: chinese have been doing this method since opening up in the 1970's, if a123 didn't know they would take their technology they were very naive, chinese are ruthless business people generally, if we temporarily get low price but quality cells then its all goood.
 
strange posts from flathill, offtopic: chinese have been doing this method since opening up in the 1970's, if a123 didn't know they would take their technology they were very naive, chinese are ruthless business people generally, if we temporarily get low price but quality cells then its all goood.
+1

further, a123systems has done everything not to do business with end users....no surprise somebody would jump in to take this business oportunity...
 
Whatever it takes to make them broadly available for the cheapest price possible is what I'm in favor of. A123 had too long already IMO to develop and take advantage of the monopoly they created. Now that time is up. If they can't already produce those original M1 cells for $1-2/ea then it's due only to poor decisions. imagine what their market penetration would be and how big Dewalt's cordless business would be now if those cells were less than half the cost for the past several years. Imagine where ebikes would be.

John
 
I tend to agree with that. A123's could have been in everything by now, not just a few roombas. A mid priced boombox should by now have a built in A123 pack for one. They should be in ebikes, lawnmowers, etc in big numbers by now too. Maybe not at quite as cheap prices as we'd like, but cheap as 2c lifepo4 would satisfy me. 5 ah pouch cells, and a true 4c rate would be plenty for ebikes that still are "bikes".

Now the company reminds me of the Wright brothers, who invented an airplane in the first half of thier life, then spend the second half in court suing Curtis and others instead of improving or even producing many of thier invention.
 
From all accounts A123 still sells a lot of cells for stationary power backup. Seems to be their biggest market according to Seth Fletcher's book. I would be frocking stoked if they came up with a 6 Ah pouch cell the size of a Turnigy cell. That's the only reason I'm not going with A123s on my race bike; 20 Ah single pouches are just inconveniently sized for tight spots. They have the life cycle, the energy density and the safety to make it happen. However, they refused to sell to those who could use it the most, and allowed themselves to become a middleman, as someone so eloquently put it earlier.
 
I think those 15ah A123 cells that Cellman procured a couple of years ago would have been a boon to us. Too bad they stopped making them.
 
zzoing said:
Flathill that was a mad load of information! if you had the energy to read all that info, it would have made sense to spend 5 minutes summarizing what it all meant and giving us excerpts and link...

The first post tells A123 were well aware of danger of doing business in China.

The second post explains why they didn't care. The founder from Taiwan setup the first 5 factories in his dad's home town in China not Taiwan. A123 plainly states "we ended up having to teach these guys how to make our state-of-the-art, world-class batteries...And some of them are [now] competing with us directly." Research Taiwan-China relations to see how this doesn't make sense. Now ask yourself if the USA plant was sabotaged.

A123 is going bankrupt as I predicted and the IP will be sold off to a Chinese interest (like Evergreen solar also MIT tech).

The stock is down 14% today [class action shareholder lawsuit, they did not disclose the "mis calibrated" laser welder at the USA plant until the insiders could sell their shares, using the recent Consumer Reports story coverage on Fisker as cover, even though Victpower has been defective (1 in 4 may have a problem if compressed) USA cells for months meaning they knew of the problem before looking at the Consumer Reports car a few weeks ago] and is under a dollar so it will soon be delisted. From the spaceship earth citizen perspective it means cheaper batteries and you shouldn't really care unless you are uncomfortable with China being the only superpower when the dollar collapses. From a USA citizen perspective, your tax dollars are funding research that ends up benefiting foreign countries more than the USA.
 
A123 bankrupt? ?? NOOOOO
I just yesterday understood what a bad quality of a123 clones china batteries. Low cycles, low C-rate, high risk to inflation.
 
They knew this was coming:
Subsidized Green Energy Company Struggles, Lays Off Workers — Rewards Top Executives
Analyst: 'It looks like they are trying to pad their top people’s wallets in case something really bad happens'
http://www.mackinac.org/16500
 
Back
Top