AussieJester
1 TW
ThunderDuck said:Welcome to the forum ThunderDuck ...
Of course you're right my apologies... welcome to the forum
not everyone here is an ass like me alot of the time haha
KiM
ThunderDuck said:Welcome to the forum ThunderDuck ...
Here's the link for anyone wanting to know all the specs on this cheap motor...dontsendbubbamail said:Could you share the model and vendor of the cheap outrunner? I am assuming that this motor has that extra bearing supporting the front of the bell.
If you think that's "bad" -wait till you get into production AND on the tele-tubbies. :lol:Kepler said:Sorry if I didnt get back to you on one of your questions a while back. I just must have missed it. I will try and answer the above for you but man, thats a lot of questions.
This one, link above, is the "big brother" to the one you are testing now, so it should work too & maybe give more headroom on preventing the magic smoke.Kepler said:havent tried it so I cant comment.
EVTodd said:Keep in mind that the motor posted above isn't a huge outrunner with tons of power like a lot of people on this forum are looking for. The reason I'm using it is because my girlfriend doesn't weigh very much and she is only looking for an 18-20 mph top speed.
If you can get the standard kit to 20mph on the flats, then that will be the perfect speed for USA. Macho users can just bump the voltage to go faster as long as you allow for wiggle room in your (programmable?) throttle/controller setup... maybe 28mph before having to upgrade the throttle/controller setup???Kepler said:Keep in mind, this is not a high powered setup, its primarilly meant to be a hill assist. 1000W is plenty for hill assist and moves you along at a decent speed also.
I understand completely. I'm going to try to build a similar design for a monotube SWB recumbent, but I'll still buy one of yours (I'm watching for your "ready to take orders" postKepler said:My apologies for removing the detailed drawings. Things have really snowballed here and it’s gone from a hobby project to perhaps something much bigger.
You're right. The photos from all angles are very helpful. I think I'll build a fit-only non-functional version out of hardboard first. It'll be strong enough to see if I can make the torque-swing work but not enough to actually drive a wheel. I doubt that I'll make the swing work, but it sure would be nicer than having to use a shifter cable to engage.spinningmagnets said:You have all the information you need to copy this for your own use. Make one out of wood first. I recommend particle board to finalise dimensions.
+1Kepler said:I'm excited!!![]()
Kepler said:Didn’t give the motor any real break and finished the pack off right down to the LVC.
Kepler said:Managed to finally get some testing in between rain show down here in sunny Melbourne Oz. With the little Turnigy 55-60D installed, went out to see if I could burn this little sucker out. Running a 5S 5000 pack, I pushed the little motor as hard as I could with lots full throttle uphill climbs, accelerating from low speed to full, and everything else in between. Performance was mild as expected but acceptable and felt similar to my 408 hub motor on 36V. Didn’t give the motor any real break and finished the pack off right down to the LVC.
Kepler said:A couple of photos of the drive as it approaches production stage.
By Acrylic, exactly what material do you mean? Plexiglass? (methyl methacrylate) or Lexan? or ?Kepler said:Refinement has been the main focus this week. Fitted new side plates and pivot plates in black Acrylic instead of aluminium. The Acrylic plate is surprisingly strong especially when used in a box construction like this. So far this material is looking quite suitable for certain parts of the drive and in conjunction with the 60-65D motor, weight is down to 1200 grams. The black acrylic I think looks really neat and providing it survives testing, will most likely become a standard feature.
This interface might be helpful for other RC motor users on ES. It can probably be applied to other direct drive rollers (i.e. EVTodd) on the tire too? Can you offer this interface to ES members with RC motor applications? Did someone on ES help you develop this option?Kepler said:The controller interface is a few weeks off yet but will be well worth waiting for. This piece of electronics will tie the whole project together with features never offered before within the ebike industry.
Kepler said:Jester building a friction drive, now we have heard it all. Next thing the we will see the cruiser with a friction drive hanging off the back.![]()
The acrylic material is methyl methacrylate. In relation to the interface, I see no reason why it cant be sold as separate unit. And yes, someone else is developing the interface basically to my specification.deVries said:By Acrylic, exactly what material do you mean? Plexiglass? (methyl methacrylate) or Lexan? or ?Kepler said:Refinement has been the main focus this week. Fitted new side plates and pivot plates in black Acrylic instead of aluminium. The Acrylic plate is surprisingly strong especially when used in a box construction like this. So far this material is looking quite suitable for certain parts of the drive and in conjunction with the 60-65D motor, weight is down to 1200 grams. The black acrylic I think looks really neat and providing it survives testing, will most likely become a standard feature.
This interface might be helpful for other RC motor users on ES. It can probably be applied to other direct drive rollers (i.e. EVTodd) on the tire too? Can you offer this interface to ES members with RC motor applications? Did someone on ES help you develop this option?Kepler said:The controller interface is a few weeks off yet but will be well worth waiting for. This piece of electronics will tie the whole project together with features never offered before within the ebike industry.![]()
![]()
8)
EVTodd said:I'm a little surprised by the acrylic pieces. Around here any plastic stock usually costs more than aluminum. Are you doing it for weight savings or material cost? It can't be for the strength can it?
Keep in mind that many plastics deteriorate when exposed to uv for a long time. It may not be a huge issue but it may since those pieces are a pretty important part of the drive.
Kepler said:Interested to know what the general consensus is in relation to Aluminium versus Acrylic versus Carbon Fibre. Cost wise, I estimate anodized aluminium will add 10% to the price over Acrylic with Carbon Fibre adding around 20% to the drive kit over Acrylic. Are people willing to pay the extra for the bling or is cost the biggest driving factor?
I have a significant background in plastics, and I would strongly suggest not using MM. It is prone to crazing and then cracking along hairline scratches/stresses AND drill holes! Polycarbonate or Lexan tm is the only choice I know of that would not tend to craze and crack. I'm sure there are other plastics that could be used too, but these may be more expensive.Kepler said:That being said, although quite strong, you may break a side frame or pivot plate if the drive was dropped from height. However, I think its plenty strong enough for normal operation. I pick a Scorpion motor tomomow and plan to run this motor hard on 6S with the Acrylic parts. This will be a 2000W setup so it should test out the strength of the Acrylic under the highest recommended load.
Interested to know what the general consensus is in relation to Aluminium versus Acrylic versus Carbon Fibre. Cost wise, I estimate anodized aluminium will add 10% to the price over Acrylic with Carbon Fibre adding around 20% to the drive kit over Acrylic. Are people willing to pay the extra for the bling or is cost the biggest driving factor?