Concept illustration from earlier Justin post is here.justin_le said:It's really just a single comparator IC...
Concept illustration from earlier Justin post is here.justin_le said:It's really just a single comparator IC...
justin_le said:Kepler said:Thanks for that Justin.
So just to be perfectly clear with using a resistor and the Vex input to get around the HV issue, I presume the drawing below is what you mean. Basically I am turning it into a HV setup but using a dropdown resistor rather then a DC-DC converter, correct?
Yes, that is it exactly. If the resistor is going inside the casing, I would try to locate off to the far side of the enclosure just to spread out the location of hot spots in the device and better help with the heat dissipation. I'd use 5K for R2, and 100K for R1, and your calibrated V/V setting will be around 21.
-Justin
Kepler said:Re scaled V/V and found I needed 15 for the CA to read the correct pack voltage. Voltage on the Vex pad is 37V.
Kepler said:If you are going to use the CA3 to take care of throttle, you need to connect ThrOut directly to SP on the controller. The standard CA connection is a throttle override which is why it goes though a diode.
Your CA plug needs to be connected as per the attached drawing. At the moment your ThrOut would be going to the D4 diode in the top left hand corner of the drawing rather then to the SP pad.
justin_le said:Kepler said:Re scaled V/V and found I needed 15 for the CA to read the correct pack voltage. Voltage on the Vex pad is 37V.
Yikes! Sorry Kepler, I totally typo'd in referencing your schematic sketch, it should indeed be R1 that is 5.1K, and R2 which is 100K. I'm used to putting the label R1 on the top resistor. Anyways Vex needs to be in the 0-5V range, fortunately there is a series resistor that should have protected the chip from damage due to the 37V being there, so all should be good once you swap these two resistors around.
-Justin
bajajoe said:Much experimentation with the various V3 CA settings to settle down some surging effects which was coming along nicely and then saw the post by Kepler (hope I have the name right) which brought up the possibility of adjusting the number of poles from 8 to 16 for the Thun. This probably had a more positive effect than all the other mods I had tried! Very smooth now.
2handy said:So who am I & what am I up to?
I'm just embarking on the ebike world, having recently received my simple (compared to some of the amazing bikes that lots of you guys here have!) 1kw rear wheel mp3 hub kit & a 48v 10a battery. I'll get it sorted over the coming week or so, before I too look at becoming a proud CA3 owner.
I'll post a picture when I do.
But based on yours and Keplers feedback once I get back to it, I'm going to be adding a option to choose the PAS filter length to be 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2 pedal rotations. The fractional ones will only work with a dual left and right pedal torque meters, but with the THUN setting it to 2 rotations would be equivalent to the 16 pole trick without messing up any of the stats.
The setup interface is also being changed so that you dial in a 0-999% boost rather than the technically precise but more obscure Watts/N-m. So if you set it to 200%, then each watt of human power would produce 2 watts of electrical power.
Kepler said:One other problem I am experiencing with the torque sensing setup is that the bike tends to surge when pedalling from a dead stop. It then settles down after a few surge cycles.
Best to email the Grin Tech sales guys (sales@ebikes.ca) for purchase questions. The sales folks are always on the job and can get you a response the quickest. I'm thinking the parts will be available by email request before the web site actually gets updated...Architectonic said:When will those stem brackets be available?
Justin is certainly the man with the proper answer on this one, but meanwhile, I would hazard a guess that this might be addressed by reducing PLim->WGain in the same manner as tuning out overshoot for a Power Throttle configuration (i.e. ThrI->CntrlMode=Power). If you examine the Limit Flags on the diagnostic screen, the 'W' flag is always asserted which indicates that that WGain is in play. Under the covers the Watts-based PAS torque parameters are operating by power limiting so reducing the gain a bit should reduce the overshoot at the cost of a slightly slower response.Kepler said:One other problem I am experiencing with the torque sensing setup is that the bike tends to surge when pedalling from a dead stop. It then settles down after a few surge cycles.
teklektik said:Justin is certainly the man with the proper answer on this one, but meanwhile, I would hazard a guess that this might be addressed by reducing PLim->WGain in the same manner as tuning out overshoot for a Power Throttle configuration (i.e. ThrI->CntrlMode=Power). If you examine the Limit Flags on the diagnostic screen, the 'W' flag is always asserted which indicates that that WGain is in play. Under the covers the Watts-based PAS torque parameters are operating by power limiting so reducing the gain a bit should reduce the overshoot at the cost of a slightly slower response.Kepler said:One other problem I am experiencing with the torque sensing setup is that the bike tends to surge when pedalling from a dead stop. It then settles down after a few surge cycles.
I don't have the means to verify this strategy so this is just winging it, but it might be worth a try....
Please see page 21 of the present Unofficial User Guide for Aux Pot options. Unfortunately, there is no complete off-the-shelf solution - more or less fabrication will be required depending on the switching technique that you select.bajajoe said:If anyone can lead me to enlightenment regarding how to set up an external 3 way switch which would allow instant change to Trq Asst level thanks ahead of time.
It seems I have seen something about using the aux. pot on the CA3 for this but I am hoping for a plug and play option.