John in CR
100 TW
merkhond said:So you say it needs 8 times the power, but that can change when i use a more efficient propeller i suppose?
If you end up with the same efficiency as Seadoo's prop and rpm. I'd think a watercraft company should be pretty good at that, so duplicating theirs is unlikely. Slower bigger props tend to be more efficient, and you're unlikely to go much bigger, so to produce 8 times the power that means higher rpm and longer pitch, and unfortunately probably more slippage which means lower efficiency. More than likely you'd end up needing 9-10 times power from the motor to double your speed.
You are likely to end up using a more efficient motor, but that wouldn't change the power requirements at the prop, it would mean longer run times for the same amount of battery.
Again, the starting point is better efficiency through the water. I wouldn't be surprised if you could pick up close to a 50% increase in speed simply by making everything more sleek and increasing the prop pitch. You don't see hoses, dangling belt, squarish lead weights and other protrusions hanging off a dolphin do you? Get all that tidied up and sleek. Another item of really poor hydrodynamics is that flat bottomed scuba tank, so come up with a smoothly tapered cap for that. Get 50% more speed in that manner, and then you only need to double the power and the proper prop to get to 10.
To get exited first hand about the difference it can make, do a speed comparison in a swimming pool with full gear and then also with nothing but your mask and fins. That won't show the full potential, because it won't include the higher speed prop the motor can swing when you have less drag in the water.
John