There is no reason to use any more than 1200 watts or to go faster than 30 mph even though I can with a 5 lb motor.eP said:So you are ready to racing with turtles RandyEbikeMaui said:More than any ebike hub motor.![]()
Stop this shit!! Randy.
What is the efficiency at 0.2 HP ?
0.2 HP is 149 watts.EbikeMaui said:There is no reason to use any more than 1200 watts or to go faster than 30 mph even though I can with a 5 lb motor.
geoff57 said:Hi all
I use a external motor myself (USPD modified) I can see the situation from the outside looking in Randy can't or does not want to give an answer to your question as he knows at 0.2 hp his motor is not as efficient from what I have read the large motor he is using can't be, the only way to increase the efficiency at low wattages is to increase the reduction ratio between motor RPM and wheel RPM, this would reduce top/peak speed and from what I have read Randy likes to be a speed demon.
EbikeMaui said:A well designd 1000 watt hub motor can be made to be efficient at all speeds from 1 rpm to 600 RPM or more and weigh about 8 lbs.geoff57 said:hi eP
the other solution is to fit a multispeed gearbox much like a car so that the motor is able to run at the most efficient RPM but a wide range of speeds, this is only possable with an external motor.
Geoff
eP said:EbikeMaui said:A well designd 1000 watt hub motor can be made to be efficient at all speeds from 1 rpm to 600 RPM or more and weigh about 8 lbs.geoff57 said:hi eP
the other solution is to fit a multispeed gearbox much like a car so that the motor is able to run at the most efficient RPM but a wide range of speeds, this is only possable with an external motor.
Geoff
So what is the efficiency at 1000W power_in and 1 rpm ???
At what ratio ???
The design of the hub motor to provide a low end efficiency CAN be improved.A external mounted motor can be just as easy to mount and it can be totaly protected without adding unneeded heavy unsuspended weight on the axil. There is still plenty of room for debate and ebike system improvment. The thing is that not many people are making any improvments on ebikes and just settle for a pop on hub motor as bad as they are because ther are cheap.geoff57 said:eP said:EbikeMaui said:A well designd 1000 watt hub motor can be made to be efficient at all speeds from 1 rpm to 600 RPM or more and weigh about 8 lbs.geoff57 said:hi eP
the other solution is to fit a multispeed gearbox much like a car so that the motor is able to run at the most efficient RPM but a wide range of speeds, this is only possable with an external motor.
Geoff
So what is the efficiency at 1000W power_in and 1 rpm ???
At what ratio ???
Hi all
Since increasing the voltage on my setup I can see that at higher wattages starting from still is a lot easer I still say it must be inefficient at low speeds and high wattages as my best bet on efficiency is watts to speed and Who wants to travel at 120meters an hour(1rpm on a 26inch wheel) .
Any of us with a watt meter (eg drainbrain) have seen at start off the wattage peaks and then as speed increases the watts go down to a crusing speed, this is the point at which efficency should be mesured.
I think I will start up a thread on this after I have done some more tests to back up my statements,to start my cycle cruses at approx 25 mph with a wattage of 850, so watts divided by mph gives an answer of 34 the higher the number the less efficient it is. this is a thing that needs a thread of its own maybe :?
As far as a hub motor over a external motor,there is no sure answer to that debate but for simplisity and ease a hub can't be bettered,and I use an external motor!
Hi allEbikeMaui said:The design of the hub motor to provide a low end efficiency CAN be improved.A external mounted motor can be just as easy to mount and it can be totaly protected without adding unneeded heavy unsuspended weight on the axil. There is still plenty of room for debate and ebike system improvment. The thing is that not many people are making any improvments on ebikes and just settle for a pop on hub motor as bad as they are because ther are cheap.
EbikeMaui said:A external mounted motor can be just as easy to mount and it can be totaly protected without adding unneeded heavy unsuspended weight on the axil.
Why bother? Girl scout hub motors are unbeatable according to the majority of the forum members.TylerDurden said:EbikeMaui said:A external mounted motor can be just as easy to mount and it can be totaly protected without adding unneeded heavy unsuspended weight on the axil.
A tutorial on the process would be great.
![]()
EbikeMaui said:Why bother? Girl scout hub motors are unbeatable according to the majority of the forum members.TylerDurden said:EbikeMaui said:A external mounted motor can be just as easy to mount and it can be totaly protected without adding unneeded heavy unsuspended weight on the axil.
A tutorial on the process would be great.
![]()
For the same reason a video of a bike test is good...EbikeMaui said:Why bother? Girl scout hub motors are unbeatable according to the majority of the forum members.
Randy doesn't want that; nobody does. A gearless hub motor must rotate at the same speed as the wheel, which is not really very fast at all, and that puts certain limitations on the motor. A motor connected by a chain can spin very quickly due to the gear ratio. There'd be no reason to restrict the external motor to a 1:1 ratio with wheel speed as you suggest, except possibly to keep it quiet, but the chain will probably be making noise anyway. And a slowly-rotating motor would have to be large (if it is to be powerful, that is) which would make it harder to mount in a bicycle.geoff57 said:Hub motor is just a name for the place where the motor is put. Take the motor out of the hub attach it to the frame add a chain drive with the same reduction ratio as the hub motor originaly used and you have what you've always wanted randy
Please give the Puma motor specs and my motor specs to compare since you offer your expert opinion.fechter said:The Stokemonkey setup allows the motor to go through the gears on the bike. You can gear down on hills, which should (????)more than make up for the efficiency lost in the extra chain, unless you live in Kansas.
If you look at the Puma hub motor, it's really no different than Randy's setup other than the motor is in a hub. It still has gear reduction between the motor and wheel and it has a very efficient brushless motor.