Recumbent bike -> trike conversion, with jackshaft hub motor?

Drizzt321

100 mW
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
42
So I just got a used Burley Canto (Burley Canto and Taiko Recumbent Bikes - Bicycle Man) for a fairly good price, and I have this bike->trike conversion, been using it for a few years on an upright trike, 7 speed version. I'm going to be putting it on the Canto, and up until now been thinking I'll do a TSDZ2B at the cranks, go OSF on it.

However... I want to build a tallish locking storage box on the back, so considering ways I can push the 'dropouts' back 8-12". Getting a few welded tubes that'll have a tab that goes over the top of the current downtubes to the dropouts, a bolt that goes through the dropouts & the extension to hold it all in place and correct width, and then the trike conversion with appropriate connection/holes/etc at the back.

That got me thinking...I have an Ezee front hub motor already, what if I were to use it, with a sprocket on the disc brake mount, and a jackshaft, to take both the motor and the pedals, and then a 3rd sprocket going back to the rear 7-speed/derailleur. I'll just need to basically make dropout mount at the right spot, get something like these with perhaps some of these spacers?

This would save me a bunch by not having to buy the new mid-motor, and keep me from having to buy an entirely new, longer, chain and make sure it's tensioned up, etc, etc with the trike conversion even further back. Some 3/4" mini-bike jackshaft parts & bearings. I'll just need to find some collars that can take bicycle sprockets. This one might work, seems like it might have the right bolt pattern.

Or maybe a 15mm shaft with this threaded freewheel adapter would be better, and Grainger has a 15mm 303 stainless keyed rotary shaft which I suspect would work with that keying. I've emailed Utah Trikes about it.

As for the extenders, I'm figuring some 3/4" square steel tube as a base, with an additional shaft at a shallow angle going part way up the downtube to provide additional strength/anti-torque.

So...should I just go for the, theoretically, simpler TSDZ2B and put together a new chain that'll be long enough? Or would using the front-hub motor be sufficiently straightforward to add as a mid/jackshaft motor?

Here's my thoughts:

Using TSDZ2B:
Advantages:
* Torque/pedal sensor for easy PAS
* All integrated, just need to add power (already have battery) and the OSF is supposed to make it pretty great
Disadvantages:
* Either with or without extenders, looong chain to put that power through
* It's more obvious with the motor sitting up front at the cranks
* Potentially slightly higher up front cost (electrifybike.com is ~$500, but I can be sure of all parts and everything working together)
* Would turn the 3 sproket front gears into a single gear (not a big deal IMO for me)
* Might need to buy and place one or two more idlers

Ezee and Jackshaft
Advantages:
* Already have the motor & controller
* Already have CAv3
* It'll be somewhat less obvious, since it'll be behind the seat/storage box area
* Keep the front 3 sprokets at the crank
Disadvantages:
* More mechanical parts to buy, ensure I have the right ones, all compatible, etc
* PAS can't be as smooth unless I buy a torque sensor and put it in the BB, at best it'll be cadence sensor
* During build of the extension arms need to make sure things like up pretty closely
* Lots more design time needed to make sure it'll all line up well
* Might save some money, but with the extra parts and fabrication and materials cost, no guarantee, probably lucky if I "break even" with a good TSDZ2B kit

So while in _theory_ a jackshaft _might_ save me a bit of money, maybe, but I suspect it'd probably be about the same, maybe even a bit more. Although some of the cost for the extension arms (if I do end up doing them) will happen regardless, even without doing a jackshaft.

So, what do ya'll thing? Am I crazy and insane and should or shouldn't go for the Ezee and jackshaft? Am I overthinking putting the power through that long of a chain actually matters that much?

I'm not going to run it at very high power levels, at most 48v@14-16a. With the OSF I'll probably set it to allow the takeoff of 16a, and steady-state of 8a since I've read the controller can run somewhat hot and burn out if used at peak (e.g. major hill climbing) for too long. Which I don't have too many crazy hills where I'm at, and of course I can pedal a fair bit to add to it.
 
By the time you're done, the costs will probably be the same.

It'll probably be a lot more work to build a middrive vs just installing one.

You'll have much more choice about how the drive system works, since you can pick your own controller, and thus choose the feature set it has.

You'll also have much more choice about user input control methods, and the devices used to do that, and how they are interpreted by the controller (since you can stick anohter device between them like the Cycle Analyst or something you create yourself to translate as desired).


FWIW, cadence control works fine for most situations as long as you use a device to translate the cadence into a throttle signal (cycle analyst, etc), instead of a typical PAS-type controller that just uses on/off of the full amount of whatever assist level is chosen. There are some controllers (lishui with OSF, etc) that can do this, but the CA can be used to do this for any controller that has a throttle input.
 
Back
Top