LI-ghtcycle
10 MW
Joseph C. said:I would never live there but I certainly don't hate the United States, far from it, I really admire your 'can-do' and many achievements. I am definitely not into nationalism either. However, I maintain it is a sad indictment if you have to carry a gun to feel safe and by that criteria, the notion that a place is unsafe to live in, the U.S. is a failed country.
If you created a list of similar countries where people feel it necessary to carry guns. You would see what I am talking about. Jamaica, Mexico, Somalia, South Africa, Congo, and lesser known places like Turkmenistan. It's hard to argue that those places are successful.
This notion that individuals are in control of their own destiny is completely illusory.
My mistake, friend, I took the "failed nation" statement to be resentment towards the USA.
I think you may misunderstand my reason for carrying a gun from time to time depending on where I have worked and where I have had to live.
I wouldn't say that I would carry the weapon for purposes of "just to feel safe" as much as a "just in case" in most instances. The one time that I was in fear of either myself or a neighbor being attacked by the ex-con, I simply had the pistol in my house, I didn't carry it with me everywhere, at that time, I didn't know about the laws concerning concealed carry, but unfortunately this guy had just gotten out of jail for breaking into the house of a young girl and attempting to rape her, and though the cops were watching his every move, he had served his sentence, and was out of jail.
He started trying to lure a young girl in the neighborhood into trusting him so he could attempt a similar crime no doubt, but once word got out that I was packing, he never appeared again in the hallway again(not that I was spreading rumors mind you, but in a small town people have a way of finding out).
I simply became educated about the use of firearms at that time, and started feeling it was a responsibility of mine as a citizen to be able to defend myself or someone else if I were to find myself in a bad situation.
I thought very seriously about becoming a police officer, and even pursued that career and took armed security jobs for a while (BIG mistake to get paid little over minimum wage and have that kind of potential liability because when it hits the fan, the low man on the totem pole takes the blame, and here I was being sent to places that had been robbed at gun point, to walk around in a police like uniform to help prevent it!

Thank God i have never had a reason to even un-holster a weapon to defend myself or others, but there have been times and places where I have been where I was glad I had the option.
The closest I ever came to having to shoot someone was right after 911 happened, I was in the Air Force, and my squadron was part of the auxiliary Security Police, so we were given a full combat load, stationed on the air field, and with orders to "take out" anyone who appeared to be attempting to destroy an aircraft. This was poorly coordinated, and I came very close to having to choose whether or not to shoot a bus driving Tech Sergeant who blew my check point AND the guy who issued my weapon mistakenly had done the function check WITH a magazine attached, therefore loading a live round into the chamber!!

It's not really reported much when a lawful citizen uses a firearm to prevent a crime simply by presenting it in a situation where it's use might be warranted, mainly because of general fear of guns, and how people treat you differently simply for knowing that you carry one, but there have been some horrible attacks at schools and churches where in some cases armed citizens, and others armed security have prevented a gun man from going on a rampage.
A good friend of mine who just happened to also be ex-Air Force has a permit to carry in all 50 states (I believe he was in OSI, sort of the Air Force version of FBI) that he has been able to maintain, and has crossed the USA on his bicycle many times, and was very glad to have a permit, when in the middle of the night burglars tried to make off with his and a friend's gear. He chased them off with his .357, and no one was shot, and he did wish he hadn't scared them so bad because they took off in a truck with half their stuff, but there have been instances where just for kicks criminals have done horrible things to people just because they could. I would rather not trust a criminal will just rob me and not do worse to me, I would rather have the option to defend myself.
Not quite sure what you mean about controlling destiny is Illusory? I believe that it should be the right of the citizen to do their best to self-govern, and that the less government is involved in our daily lives the better. Not sure if that is what you are referring too? But I believe there is a very different approach to government in the USA than most in Europe, and I prefer to live here, but I hold nothing against those who live elsewhere.
dogman said:From where I sit, viewing the border from my house, It's pretty easy to see the difference between a failed country and one that isn't. El Paso, a murder or two a year is just across the river from Juarez with 3000 or more per year. Those are not bullshit hyped statistics. All guns illegal in Mexico BTW. So the mafia has it easy with the populace unarmed. Fortunately the killing is mostly one new cartel killing the other long establised cartel who are the police. But lots of folks end up in the crossfire, like those kids at the 16th birthday party where the wrong dude was invited.
The folks are not being fenced out of the failed country, they are trying their best to get into the USA. Here where everybody can have a gun it's a LOT safer. But mostly, its just the fact that the police are not the mafia that makes it safe. Some bad apples of course, but most cops are not criminals in the USA. That's the main criteria I use to tell the difference.
There is more to it of course, but this "failed country" is not nearly so corrupt as many others. Anywhere you might have to defend yourself against the bullies that exist. I don't belive in concealed carry myself. When I have knowingly gone places that were pretty scketchy, that pistol on the hip always had everybody I encountered treating me with utmost respect. I say you want to pack fine. Pack it right where people can see it.
Now, you wanna say our diplomacy has failed? No argument there, we did pretty much invade and conquer the country where the terrorists weren't present. Only Cheney knows why.
I agree that open carry is a better deterrent, however, even where I have lived in Montana there has grown such a misunderstanding about guns and their use, that although open carry is allowed on the books, (heck by law a woman can have a revolver in her purse and NOT be required to have a CCW in Montana!) it's not practical because so many folks would freak-out in many of the towns now populated with as many transplants from the big cities as native citizens.
There is an older gentleman who is completely harmless, who lives in Hamilton as a "mountain man" and carries a .44 on his hip because he lives in a small trailer on the edge of civilization and protects his horses from predators (mainly cougars and bears) and was banned from a few local restaurants just for open carry.
With some states laws you can actually get charged with "brandishing" or at least cause a lot of trouble for yourself for open-carry. I envy your ability to be able to open carry and have it be a good thing Dogman. Here in Oregon, especially the Portland area, if I were to walk around with a pistol on my hip, I would cause the 911 emergency switchboard to flood, not because I would be threatening anyone, or acting aggressive in anyway, but there isn't any common sense here when it comes to guns, mainly because most people know very little about them, and just have a general idea that they are bad from news, because lets face it, if something good happens, it generally doesn't make the news, only the bad stuff. If my brother wasn't married to a woman who grew up in Montana around people who hunted and used guns in positive ways, he would probably still be opposed to them.