This is something I realized some people do without thinking but for others its a radical if not practically unusable method of looking at or thinking with when examining climate change..
That is, looking at real-world data, like food production.
Food production in Australia just keeps getting better every year with constant "record harvests" of all types of foods.
One of the main climate change claims is crops yields will fail massively..
https://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/wa-harvest-records-look-set-to-be-broken-just-not-the-big-one-20181130-p50jj1.html
https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-08-23/record-grain-harvest-potential-for-wa-farmers/10152200
https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/tasmanian-country/tasmanian-crops-break-australian-harvesting-records/news-story/c8697d65f2cfc6e3cc25ca175fa42e9a
There is so much money now in politically powered green groups that the corruption in the system is fascinating.
For instance, there was a guy paid over $40,000 to turn off the air conditioning/cooling/systems inside a live sheep export ship so they could "film animal cruelty", when in fact the paid activists basically created the animal cruelty in the first place.
https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/australia/cash-for-cruelty-claims-over-live-export-footage-ng-b881076639z
It's just like paying scientists to find weather/temp abnormalities, I am sure you can find them if you look hard enough, but the in the "real-world" there isn't anything to look at because food production etc is only going up not down.
There are so many points of proof that climate change is about political power because the leftist political groups that aline to it ignore far more effective carbon reduction technologies
Because "on average" extreme wind-farm/solar deployment in Germany at (55GW's capacity wind farm) still ends up burning coal/gas so frquently that on average Germany emits 10 times more CO2 than Nuclear based France.
10 times difference in emissions via two different technologies is massive.
If France and Germany were two different vehicles, and we were comparing emissions on these two vehicles, then Germany look would like a complete joke.
But this is what we do with renewables vs nuclear tech, we ignore the real world data on an insane level, why? Because its all about politics/money, and political power gains.
Leftist/Green groups know the real-data co2 emissions of technologies, for some its their job, and can quickly be seen by looking at any kind of real-world data energy sites and charts like these below.
So what the leftists/green groups are really saying by being pro-renewables only, is ultimately they think climate change is bullshit, or else they would be jumping up and down for next-gen nuclear. Instead, its all for money and political power, its a type of political/money powered cancer.
http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/2/11/german-electricity-was-nearly-10-times-dirtier-than-frances-in-2016
To me, this weird insanity is ultimately caused by traditional broadcast mainstream media, its the end result of having too much power controlling peoples minds by repeating bad information.
The corrupting power of mainstream broadcast media will always be abused in ways the typical human mind can't imagine.
The fix to this problem is to make all media IP-streaming based only.
This way more competition exists with more voices and opinions out there then just typically two major voices.
Then on top of Leftist political-groups at the same time directly campaign for things that increase co2 emissions, like mass immigration and increasing population.
According to TheGuardian, when a 3rd world person moves to the 1st-world their carbon footprint increases by roughly massive 60x times!
So 1 million new migrants is 60million times more co2! 1 million new immigrants is just 4 years worth of Australian migration (Australia take 250k new people each year on average, the highest per capita anywhere in the world)
https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/jan/31/world-carbon-dioxide-emissions-country-data-co2