Senile...LOL! You're the one who fell for a load of horseshilt. My hubmotors would make better drone motors despite the extra weight. For the only listing for power those scammers show input power, and then they were stupid enough to show torque, rpm, and temp info, because that info exposes how bad that motor is. Power = Nm of torque X rpm X 0.1047 . An easy bit of number crunching shows why the motor runs at those temp levels and low power compared to the max power they claim, despite being in a strong flow of air for cooling from the propeller. That's because the best efficiency that motor could manage even swinging the light prop is just 84%. They tried to hide the poor efficiency by redefining efficiency as grams per watt of input.
In comparison, at those torque and rpm levels my hubmotor would see a relatively easy load and run at over 94% efficiency. Loading mine down with a bigger prop to require 100Nm of torque would put it right at peak efficiency of almost 96% at the well over 100V required to turn it at that rpm. Whine and cry foul all you want about the over double my motor weighs, and you'd be forgetting about the extra battery weight running that motor would require. Plus the far greater risk of failure running those high temps.
The motor has a nice low winding resistance, so it's low efficiency at cruising rpm must be due to running at too high a voltage. The slot/pole count is too high, probably combined with cheap laminating steel. Drop the voltage to 50V or so and the efficiency should go up to more useful levels and end up with about a 7-10kw motor... For that larcenous price, no thanks!
Senile my A$$ !