In my hours of wasted lifetime surfing the Net, when I could have been doing the dishes or loads of laundry, I stumbled on a potential for a revolution in battery technology: The Carbon Lead Acid chemistry. It appears that the main lead acid battery killer, sulfation, has been defeated, or at least tamed. The attached link shows many thousands of cycles (although only at a 10% DOD) of the carbon battery against a variety of other types, including LiFePO4.
Although the energy and weight advantages of Lithium are requirements for many types of effective EVs, many of us could get by with (presumably) inexpensive lead acid if only the batteries didn't fail so early.
Questions:
1)The author of the article owns stock in one of the research companies described, so is the information simply hype?
2) Is the cycle life still high if the DOD is 50% or more, a normal result of motive use (possible, I think, if the carbon still inhibits sulfation).
3) Will the mainstream lead acid battery makers adopt this chemistry? Presently, IMO, they rely on the batteries as being a consumable item. Trojan, for example, owns the golf cart and fork lift market, and those machines require fresh batteries every few years. The carbon type could effectively last forever, thus killing the replacement sales model.
4) Will Chevron, or another corrupt entity, simply buy up the patents (as with large format NiMH cells) and lock out the use of carbon batteries in motive applications?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/115257-lead-carbon-a-game-changer-for-alternative-energy-storage
Although the energy and weight advantages of Lithium are requirements for many types of effective EVs, many of us could get by with (presumably) inexpensive lead acid if only the batteries didn't fail so early.
Questions:
1)The author of the article owns stock in one of the research companies described, so is the information simply hype?
2) Is the cycle life still high if the DOD is 50% or more, a normal result of motive use (possible, I think, if the carbon still inhibits sulfation).
3) Will the mainstream lead acid battery makers adopt this chemistry? Presently, IMO, they rely on the batteries as being a consumable item. Trojan, for example, owns the golf cart and fork lift market, and those machines require fresh batteries every few years. The carbon type could effectively last forever, thus killing the replacement sales model.
4) Will Chevron, or another corrupt entity, simply buy up the patents (as with large format NiMH cells) and lock out the use of carbon batteries in motive applications?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/115257-lead-carbon-a-game-changer-for-alternative-energy-storage