mid drive hub motor advantages?

DrkAngel said:
Mid-Drive, through the bicycle gears (sprockets)...

A much smoother, continuous, 500w motor input should hold up nicely, ... tho I would recommend reducing throttle during shifts.
Further thought on the "impact" during "shifts".
This damaging jolt could be effectively eliminated-buffered by the placement of a properly "heavily-sprung" idler sprocket on the tensioned side of the, motor to chainring, chain. (Heavy tensioned sprocket = H)
Of course, there would also have to be a lightly tensioned idler sprocket on the opposing, unloaded chain segment. (Lightly tensioned sprocket = L)
At full throttle, the H sprocket should be at near full bend of the chain, with the L sprocket idling on a near straight chain.
At shift, the H sprocket will briefly allow a straightening of the chain, (L sprocket taking up the slack), effectively spreading the shift impact over a much longer time period - similar to a shock absorber.

(H idler sprocket would require heavier than normal bearings, being under constant heavy load.)

This should increase the survivability of the 7 speed eBike drivetrain an extreme amount!

Sorry if this is not clearly described.
It might need diagrams, or a mock build, to properly get the idea across.

Will re-think explanation, or post pictures.
Just brain-storming at present.
 
Jay,

I forgot to ask, are those hubbies direct drive or geared hubmotors? If direct drive then the motors are fine up to quite fun power levels, literally thousands of watts. Flat roads and your light load means much can be done easily at low cost or effort. From the sound of it the 500W must be direct drive, since a geared hub would pull better off the line. You may be able to get away with a 5 minute nearly free mod that at least doubles your acceleration.

Be warned though. The chase for more performance is addictive, and just to give you an idea my bike and I weigh almost 400lbs with the backpack I typically carry. My motor is rated at 800W at 48V. With good batteries at 74V and a powerful controller that motor pushes me at 55-60mph on the highway, and leaving stoplights I kick the crap out of every gas scooter I run across. I could never go back to riding a 48V500W ebike. Even with your light load your motor can't get you to the performance mine has, but 40mph and much much better takeoffs are within easy reach. :mrgreen:

Have fun and let me know if you want me to walk you through easy mods. You'll need just a phillips screwdriver, a soldering iron, some solder, and a small piece of thin copper wire.

John
 
DrkAngel said:
DrkAngel said:
Mid-Drive, through the bicycle gears (sprockets)...

A much smoother, continuous, 500w motor input should hold up nicely, ... tho I would recommend reducing throttle during shifts.
Further thought on the "impact" during "shifts".
This damaging jolt could be effectively eliminated-buffered by the placement of a properly "heavily-sprung" idler sprocket on the tensioned side of the, motor to chainring, chain. (Heavy tensioned sprocket = H)
Of course, there would also have to be a lightly tensioned idler sprocket on the opposing, unloaded chain segment. (Lightly tensioned sprocket = L)
At full throttle, the H sprocket should be at near full bend of the chain, with the L sprocket idling on a near straight chain.
At shift, the H sprocket will briefly allow a straightening of the chain, (L sprocket taking up the slack), effectively spreading the shift impact over a much longer time period - similar to a shock absorber.

(H idler sprocket would require heavier than normal bearings, being under constant heavy load.)

This should increase the survivability of the 7 speed eBike drivetrain an extreme amount!

Sorry if this is not clearly described.
It might need diagrams, or a mock build, to properly get the idea across.

Will re-think explanation, or post pictures.
Just brain-storming at present.
I've done that and will be using the same system on my current project so pictures will be available.
I wasn't entirely happy with the first version, as it was near impossible to change spring tensions, but with the new build I should have that part worked out a little better (hopefully much better)
For the "first build" idler I used two 5/8" axle bearings threaded in loo of a freewheel for the idler sprocket.
Unfortunately In my current location of the world, I lack access to a bearing house or well-equipped machine shops with requisite skilled helpers, limiting my choices
I'm still unsure how I wanna do this one (it will happen when I get to that point :lol:)
There are manufactured 'solutions', but they are rather expensive -and I can't remember if they make any of those devices for 410/415 chain
 
This has become very informative with loads of decent views and information.

To be totally honest Im not sure if my motor is geared or a direct drive its a standard ebike kit I got from China. Its also pretty big so if I was to run this mid drive it would have to mounted inside the frames triangle which I dont actually mind as I would have my battery in a back pack anyway.

My 48v 250 hub motor is much smaller and that could fit just in front of the bb which would be better but cant see much more power coming from that motor.

What is the mod that you mentioned, sounds simple enough?
 
John in CR said:
You may be able to get away with a 5 minute nearly free mod that at least doubles your acceleration.

Be warned though. The chase for more performance is addictive, and just to give you an idea my bike and I weigh almost 400lbs with the backpack I typically carry. My motor is rated at 800W at 48V. With good batteries at 74V and a powerful controller that motor pushes me at 55-60mph on the highway, and leaving stoplights I kick the crap out of every gas scooter I run across. I could never go back to riding a 48V500W ebike. Even with your light load your motor can't get you to the performance mine has, but 40mph and much much better takeoffs are within easy reach. :mrgreen:

Have fun and let me know if you want me to walk you through easy mods. You'll need just a phillips screwdriver, a soldering iron, some solder, and a small piece of thin copper wire.

John
Is it possible to modify the geared 1000W rear hub similarly?
 
It's just a simple controller modification that makes the controller allow the motor to draw more current. You can often access it through the end cover on the controller making it even simpler. The mod is typically done in a manner that has unpredictable results, but I came up with a method that is both simple and controllable. http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=31643

Rollodo- This is a controller mod, not a change in the motor. With geared hubs you do have to be more careful pushing their limits, because the gears and "clutch" have hard to predict rpm and torque upper limits and there's no easy way of knowing if you are approaching the limit. With a direct drive motor the limits aren't a defined point where pushing past it breaks the motor immediately like a plastic gear in a geared hub.
 
MadRhino said:
@DrkAngel

All those numbers are fine, but most lack a 0 at the end to make any Ebike interesting to me.
When you start feeding 10 times human power, which I consider only the beginning of interesting performance, a bicycle drive train is not very long to show its limits.

In a way ... I must agree ...

But ... 10 times human power?

I think we are talking about 2 different types of "eBike"!

Maybe we should sub-categorize "eBikes"?
A subject I consider worthy of it's own thread! Continued here > eaBike vs eBike vs eMotorcycle
 
DrkAngel said:
DrkAngel said:
Mid-Drive, through the bicycle gears (sprockets)...

A much smoother, continuous, 500w motor input should hold up nicely, ... tho I would recommend reducing throttle during shifts.
Further thought on the "impact" during "shifts".
This damaging jolt could be effectively eliminated-buffered by the placement of a properly "heavily-sprung" idler sprocket on the tensioned side of the, motor to chainring, chain. (Heavy tensioned sprocket = H)
Of course, there would also have to be a lightly tensioned idler sprocket on the opposing, unloaded chain segment. (Lightly tensioned sprocket = L)
At full throttle, the H sprocket should be at near full bend of the chain, with the L sprocket idling on a near straight chain.
At shift, the H sprocket will briefly allow a straightening of the chain, (L sprocket taking up the slack), effectively spreading the shift impact over a much longer time period - similar to a shock absorber.

(H idler sprocket would require heavier than normal bearings, being under constant heavy load.)

This should increase the survivability of the 7 speed eBike drivetrain an extreme amount! ...

If the motor runs through the BB, with no shifting on the front chainring, the application of a Heavy idler on top of the chain, slightly rearward of the chainring, should greatly simplify the build of a "shifting shock absorber"!
The "slack side" (L) of the chain is adequately served by the derailleur.
 
If a hub motor (or any motor for that matter) is rated at some wattage, how do we know how far we can push it and not let it overheat?

There are several limitations:

1 - Motor integrity. Spin it too fast, it will tear itself apart.
2 - Motor heat buildup. Get it too hot, the insulation in the wires will melt (probably first), continue adding heat and eventually the copper itself will melt and short. Continue adding heat somehow, eventually the iron will melt (almost impossible). Also, more heat will mean weaker epoxies and material strengths.
3 - Motor insulation arcing. This would be from overvoltage.

#3 is almost negligible. Most enameled wire insulation is good for hundreds of volts before it will electrically arc through this to short cut to the next wire or the frame. So, overvoltage is probably never an issue unless you're doing 10x or something crazy.

#1 is dependent on voltage. More voltage means higher speeds means more structural forces. As a bonus, more speed means the spinning part of the motor brushes past air faster, helping keep it cool. As a negative, that means more "windage" losses, (air resistance) but these are miniscule. On a given motor, you can probably get away with 3-5x voltage (and thereby RPM) without the motor pulling itself apart via centrifugal forces. But it will be delicate. And stress the bearings more. And if you got a lemon that was poorly built but still plenty strong enough in normal range, it may fail. At some point, your losses increase faster than your RPM increase (efficiency per watt drops). This may be as much as 20% at 3-5x.

#2 is really the only thing worth talking about and dominates the discussion, the other two I only mentioned for thoroughness. Heat buildup comes from how much current (amps) are flowing in the wires. Note that this is cumulative heat buildup. Just about any given motor could be run at 10x wattage (call it, 3x voltage, 3x amperage), for a minute or two. You'd put 10 minutes of heat into it in 1 or 2 minutes. After that, you best let it rest for 5-8 minutes (not just normal temp, like, shut it off, drag racing style). Heat is almost the only thing that kills anything electrical, and you can always make the "continuous vs. surge" tradeoff. The motor doesn't care. Think of it like a chunk of metal under a torch.

Almost everything is overengineered, to be *sure* that it could be run at the given current for the given duty cycle (for most of us, 100% duty cycle, continuous). For example, a bridge rated for 200 tons of traffic doesn't fall apart if you put 200 tons of cars on it and then drive an extra vehicle on. (Bridges are often rated at 1/10th their actual calculated breaking point). There is no such thing as a motor than can provide X amps. Only, a motor that someone has decided is okay for X amps in Y situation. It's a somewhat made up limitation. A blender motor is "rated" at 10 amps often, because in expected residential blender use, (few seconds of vroom vroom, 5 minutes to drink the margarita), that's fine. The same motor when used as a continuous fan motor on the other hand, might be rated for 1 amp. "Is it a 10 amp or a 1amp motor then?" is what you're thinking, and the answer is both, it's a made up limitation based on expected use. A fan motor is generally 10x as big as a blender motor for the same ratings.

Helping us is that we're putting these on moving vehicles, in airflow. Generally the more we want out of them, the faster we're going, and the more airflow/cooling we're giving them. This lets us cheat a bit. Drive the same motor at the same load but sitting on rollers in a room, the motor may melt. Note that this matters for hills. Driving a 500W motor at 1000W on the flats to get extra speed yields bonus cooling. Driving a 500W motor to 1000W on an uphill yields same or slower speeds and thus less bonus cooling. What will not kill a motor at high speed will kill a motor at low speed, with power draw equal. Not a problem when obeying rated current, maybe a problem when ignoring ratings.

Here's how to think about heat limitations:

Moving motor parts have X amount of metal mass (copper and iron) which have to stay under Y temperature. That's about it. For max temperature, there's 3 things to consider. One is max temp before insulation melts. That's fairly easy and you can look it up in a book. Two is max temp before the insulation starts weakening and accelerating its way towards failure, perhaps after dozens/hundreds of heating/cooling cycles. Three is max temp where the insulation is fine indefinitely, not really undergoing thermal stresses. If you mistake one of the former for the latter, you may find your motor fails quickly, or, the worst "It was working fine, I took it on a dozen rides and then all of a sudden it failed! What the hell?" That's that #2 in play.

Still... go weigh, lookup, or guess at the mass of metal in the motor. Then look up the efficiency of the motor or test it (if it's 80% efficient, that means 20% of your output is heat energy added to the motor). 1000watts at 80% efficiency is 200 watts of energy pouring into heat. Then look up, or guess, a max temp that won't quickly lead to failure. Then figure from a cold room temp start, how much energy (presume ZERO cooling for now) you have to dump into the motor to heat up that much metal that many degrees. Basic multiplication. Power (watts) is energy per second so you pick any amount of seconds you want to dump the energy you want and that'll tell you how hard you can drive the motor to get there. That'll tell you your drag racing potential. (Motors may take 30 minutes to cool back down to air temp). One thing to note, the tiny little compact RC motors can't be short-term abused as much as bigger motors because there is no way getting around the fact that by being small they are low mass and respond rapidly to heat buildup. There's simple less metal to heat up. A cup of water in a pot on the stove boils faster than a gallon in a pot.

Then, remove the assumption of zero cooling fudge those numbers based on air cooling and try to guess at what point the temperature will stabalize at for a given load/airflow. If the difference indicates it's slightly increasing, it may take 20 minutes to stop appreciably increasing in heat when being driven at that load. One thing that helps, the higher the temp difference between the motor and ambient, the more effective air cooling is because they will rush even faster to match temperatures. The same amount of cooler air in the same time period will heat up hotter and take away more heat from the motor. So, in this respect, the penalty for overloading your motor actually decreases the more you abuse it. There's a bit of a free lunch.

Calculating cooling power requires somewhat complicated math to calculate. Math I barely know or don't really know. Fluid dynamics and rates of exchange and airspeeds and surface areas and all that and in the end even an engineer would only have a ballpark guess. You can easily calculate drag racing energy/heat. You can not easily calculate temperature stabilizing levels. So, don't bother trying unless, well, if you knew how you wouldn't be asking the question you'd be explaining the answer.

So long answer summarized... how do we know? We don't know. It just seems reasonable that they could be overdriven, we tried it, and it worked. The more you want to abuse it, the more of a gamble you're taking. Just like overloading a bridge. The only guarantee is that it will work when used at or below continuous rating.

Note that all of this heat buildup stuff applies to amps only. If you want to jack up the voltage, you'll increase amps too, (and anything you do will lead to increased amps), but not as much as getting the same power out by overloading the motor directly. With voltage you only have to be worried about insulation and structural integrity.

Extra amps, you can probably cheat by 25-50% most of the time just to account for conservative ratings. Extra voltage, much as you want (3-5x, not that you'd ever give it that much), just observe how much extra current flows when you do it.

Bonus complication: the inside of the motor, where not exposed to air, will heat up much hotter than the surface windings and laminations. You will melt the internals while the outside may still feel cool enough to touch. The math and modelling for this is delightfully messy and mostly guesswork.

Easiest way of saving your motor... throw a temperature-controlled breaker onto it (several inside every microwave) so that the motor simply refuses to allow power to flow if it gets too hot. You'll figure out experimentally how much you can punish and abuse it on average.

Complicated way of saying "it depends". And that was without actually explaining any of the math.

Make sense, sort of?
 
Are these temp controlled breakers small enough and are they expensive? I like that idea for sure to keep people from damaging their motors in my kits. I think it would go a long way towards happy customers!
 
If you just use them on the power lead to the halls, or the signal lead(s) from them, you can snag those thermal breakers out of many old laptop batteries for free. Sometimes they have them in old small UPS units as well, right on the SLA battery. The type you'll find in either of those is only about 5mm x 2-3mm x 10-15mm.
 
How would I search them if I wanted to buy them new??
 
DrkAngel said:
DrkAngel said:
DrkAngel said:
Mid-Drive, through the bicycle gears (sprockets)...

A much smoother, continuous, 500w motor input should hold up nicely, ... tho I would recommend reducing throttle during shifts.
Further thought on the "impact" during "shifts".
This damaging jolt could be effectively eliminated-buffered by the placement of a properly "heavily-sprung" idler sprocket on the tensioned side of the, motor to chainring, chain. (Heavy tensioned sprocket = H)
Of course, there would also have to be a lightly tensioned idler sprocket on the opposing, unloaded chain segment. (Lightly tensioned sprocket = L)
At full throttle, the H sprocket should be at near full bend of the chain, with the L sprocket idling on a near straight chain.
At shift, the H sprocket will briefly allow a straightening of the chain, (L sprocket taking up the slack), effectively spreading the shift impact over a much longer time period - similar to a shock absorber.

(H idler sprocket would require heavier than normal bearings, being under constant heavy load.)

This should increase the survivability of the 7 speed eBike drivetrain an extreme amount! ...

If the motor runs through the BB, with no shifting on the front chainring, the application of a Heavy idler on top of the chain, slightly rearward of the chainring, should greatly simplify the build of a "shifting shock absorber"!
The "slack side" (L) of the chain is adequately served by the derailleur.
I found an idler that might be adequate for the job.
Sprocket Idler 14 tooth 3/8" ID 410H 415H 40 41

Staton Inc.
They also have a large variety of build components!
 
Ok thanks!
 
These look interesting the 4bt2 version with a -56 rating seems about right.. Wonder where you could order these from and how much?? So you could just run this to your brake cutout no?
 
iperov said:
Better than cyclone - because no gears and overheat.
Better then motor-wheel because spinning weight removed from wheel - more effeciency and removed gyro effect.

Anyone know if much faster spinning gears inside a front MAC motor have alot to contribute to that gyro-effect?
 
Rollado wrote:
If a hub motor (or any motor for that matter) is rated at some wattage, how do we know how far we can push it and not let it overheat?

Can be difficult and expensive to answer. I stand on the shoulders of giants (Justin et al), and if the hub is in Justin's ebikes.ca/simulator/, it not only answers how long, but is empirically based on dyno measurements. If the hub is not in the pull down choices, several can be derived from Justin's existing collection. Questions like how far will my battery pack take me with this hub and how long before overheating are answered (hint: look for never)!
 
My view of the mid-mount through the gears v wheel motor

Pro's
Running the motor through the gears allows you to use lower gear and higher motor rpm's in relation to a hub motor for climbing hills, this results in greater efficiency and less heat created.
Gear can be selected for best efficiency.
The centrally mounted motor gives far better weight distribution.
Lower wheel inertia meens the brakes will be better.
The ability to coast, only better than using a dd hub motor.
Drastically lower unsprung mass of the rear wheel, when used on a full suspension frame this is a huge bonus in suspension performance.

Cons

Slightly higher electrical consumption when cruising due to extra mechanical losses in the drive train.
More complex system that will require more maintainence/parts replacement.
Extra complexity could result in worse reliability.
Makes a little more noise than a DD hub.

I have owned both and would say the midmount is far better than a wheel mounted hub motor, but then that is my opinion based on the way i like to ride and the terain i ride on. For a person using their bike as a pure commuter the priorities could be quite different and a hub motor in the wheel could be the favourite.
On ES you fill find fans of both setups, we each respect each others point of view and accept that there is not a single option that is "best" for everyone so look at what you want to do with the bike and build it suit your needs and remember that the pro's and cons above are just my opinion and i am a mid-mount fan.

That makes me feel like we should all sit in a circle, when its my turn i will stand up and say, Hello, my name is Simon and i'm a mid-mount fan! :D

Simon.
 
That makes me feel like we should all sit in a circle, when its my turn i will stand up and say, Hello, my name is Simon and i'm a mid-mount fan!
Good post Simon.

I really like the quiet performance and installation simplicity of front hub motors.

Because of steep hills, I went to one and two wheel pusher traillers, some setups combined with a front hub motor. I loved my pusher traillers, but once the rig had two or more motors the weight of motors, batteries, and trailers became an issue.

Once I converted the tadpole trike to a mid-drive I too became a mid-mount fan. Now with the NuVinci auto shift system it's even better (for my use). :D
 
What about the possibility of a using an internal rear hub like a Rohloff or nuVinci, and even a Schlumpf high-speed crankset up front? I don't know the power ratings of these devices, but they seem pretty sturdy. And, they can be shifted at any time and would make a very clean chain line.
 
jpcusumano said:
What about the possibility of a using an internal rear hub like a Rohloff or nuVinci, and even a Schlumpf high-speed crankset up front? I don't know the power ratings of these devices, but they seem pretty sturdy. And, they can be shifted at any time and would make a very clean chain line.
several members have used the NuVnci 191B developer's kit (no longer available)
I apparently bought "the very last one"
(i does that a lot)
If I remember correctly Rassy had some issues with some of the other geared-hubs because they were, well, geared.
Don't know much about the NuVinci 360 except it's of much smaller/lighter construction than the original 191.
The Schlumpf has also been used in more than a few builds by members of this board.

Using the forum "search" function may be of use...
(although that never werks so gud for me)
 
I built one with a Bafang QSWXK motor driving a chainwheel on the left side - just to see what sort of power characteristics it had. It pulls up the steepest hills without pedalling, and will do about 20mph on the flat. The only problem I had was the chain jumping on the motor sprocket - probably because it was the wrong size chain.I keep meaning to complete the project. I've bought a rear motor and a free-wheeling Cyclone crank. I you don't want to go too fast and you want to keep to a 250w limit, it would be a good solution because it's light and efficient; however, a bigger geared motor like a BPM or MAC has just as good climbing, better speed (on the flat) and is far simpler although heavier. If you want, you can have a look through this folder, which gives some details:
http://s451.photobucket.com/albums/qq236/d8veh/Crank%20drive/
....and a video of it working:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfWSQh8cAzI
SANY0137.jpg
 
Back
Top