e-beach said:Ok, what I don't understand is how you are getting speed tests done with all the wires hanging out and it is snowing outside?
Are you actually riding the cycle, or just propping up the back wheel and watching her spin?
Anyway the basic rule of thumb with motors is that: The rotational speed of a motor is proportional to the voltage applied.
Voltage won't help with greater torque for going up the hills, you need more amps for that.
If you want to spin that motor faster you probably need to increase the voltage of your battery. Don't burn up your new controller, make sure it can handle a higher voltage if you decided to go that direction.
Also if you go with a higher voltage, make sure you don't overheat your motor.
![]()
johnnyz said:There must be a formula to figure the RPM/Voltage of a 28 pole motor in a 16.3 inch wheel.
johnnyz said:Something seems amiss...as this bike would do 49 kph with the 72 volt setup (about 85 volts fully charged ) vs 100 volt Lithium (98 volts fully charged) and only 6 kph faster..
Buk___ said:johnnyz said:There must be a formula to figure the RPM/Voltage of a 28 pole motor in a 16.3 inch wheel.
The rpm/V will depend on much more than those few variables. Eg.
How many turns of (what gauge) wire per tooth.
Delta or Y.
Strength of the magnets.
How much laminate in each tooth.
Fill factor.
Other...
johnnyz said:Something seems amiss...as this bike would do 49 kph with the 72 volt setup (about 85 volts fully charged ) vs 100 volt Lithium (98 volts fully charged) and only 6 kph faster..
If, for example, your stator was near to saturation when running at 72V, then upping the voltage to 100 would not increase the no-load rpm proportionally, because the stator would simply not be able to absorb/carry the potential extra magnetic field.
johnnyz said:Well...now that on the face of it, makes sense. I never considered this. In fact I should have..even though QSMotors is a good company with quality products, why make a 72 volt motor with anything more than is what is required...looks like a motor re-wind is in the works..Thanks for the reply!
...Buk___ said:johnnyz said:Well...now that on the face of it, makes sense. I never considered this. In fact I should have..even though QSMotors is a good company with quality products, why make a 72 volt motor with anything more than is what is required...looks like a motor re-wind is in the works..Thanks for the reply!
The problem with that is that if they've done a bang up job of sizing their stator teeth, then they will form the saturation limit, not the windings.
At which point your only recourse would be to replace the cores with a much higher permeability. You might gain a little by moving to much thinner laminates -- say 0.2mm if they are currently 0.5mm -- but if they are already 0.35mm or less, then you'd probably lose more than you'd gain, through the extra space taken by the 'tween-laminate insulation.
Beyond that you'd need to look at something like metglas, which is expensive, difficult to work with, and almost impossible to source except in bulk.
johnnyz said:The problem with this scenario is HOW DO I KNOW?...especially if I take it be re-wound..would the "expert" do this know this?..
Buk___ said:johnnyz said:The problem with this scenario is HOW DO I KNOW?...especially if I take it be re-wound..would the "expert" do this know this?..
I'd start out by asking QS. They seemed (at least in the early days of their thread here) to be very open to discussion about their motors; making new molds to adapt their line to requests made here. It couldn't hurt to ask.
Punx0r said:I'm not sure why you have seen such a limited speed increase going from 72 to 100V but I can't see how it's anything inherent to the motor? Magnetic saturation is surely only the result of excessive winding current and nothing to do with voltage. At no-load, the current will be very low and you should be nowhere near any saturation effect.
The only things I can think to suggest are to verify the wheel speed in case there is something weird going on with your speedo. Otherwise, are you possibly bumping up against the eRPM limit for the controller due to the motor being such a high pole count?
flippy said:i have the same issue with my hub motor. 2.5kW 10". i have tried 2 motors from different factories and both are 48v. i went from 48v lead to currently 16S lithium (65v charged) so a easy 15v increase under load and i went from 43km/h to 51 while according to my calculations i should get 55+ easy.
i use a (300A) kelly controller wich is way overspecced for my use but something is causing the motor not getting higher speeds depsite cranking in enough volts to get 60km/h easy.
flippy said:i have a 26 pole motor. i already knew that when i took it apart to change the POS chinesium bearings for proper SKF ones.
and torque, it has plenty of that. its almost comical how fast i get off the line compaired to the ye olde petrol scooters, even unrestricted ones.![]()
but i wnat to get 55kph steady. but that probably means a different motor
Punx0r said:eRPM is pole pairs (13 for your motor) x mechanical RPM.
Thinking about it, with your hubmotor you're unlikely to be at the limit for even a low speed controller.
The star-delta thing is how the windings are terminated and can usually be changed without rewinding the motor. If you motor is wired in star then changing to delta would give a 1.7x increase in speed for the same voltage (and the same increase in phase current to produce the same torque). However, I believe delta-wired as standard is more common, so don't get your hopes up...
Punx0r said:It's not something I've done, just read about on this forum, so it's not something I have experience of. However, if you follow the phase leads inside the motor, they are soldered to the ends of the winding bundles. How the bundles are joined to each other and the phase leads determines the star/delta. If memory serves on most motors, it's just a case of unsoldering, working out what winding is what and reterminating.
it will be good if QS can advise what it is as standard.