John in CR
100 TW
Samd said:Sure. For a given length of wire.
I tend to go with Barent's point earlier though.
Cut them short.
As short as possible and as large as practical.
Samd said:Sure. For a given length of wire.
I tend to go with Barent's point earlier though.
Cut them short.
Stielz said:A question for you guys who have sprayed a rust protection enamel on the internals of you motor,
Would this product be suitable for that purpose?
https://www.rustoleum.com/product-catalog/consumer-brands/specialty/high-heat-ultra/
And a snapshot from the datasheet
View attachment 10
Thinking the the black color would give improved heat dissipation from higher IR radiation
Only the insides of the Hub covers get painted Flat Black. This is where you want the IR heat to go, not to the stator itself, which is what is generating the heat in the first place.macribs said:So is the red coat sort of a primer, I was under the impression that you now do flat black paint due to heat removal?
Samd said:Yep, I thought it was well known that they had some issue with the earlier 20 strands. Most should be 21 now.
What voltage and amps are you running at 10kw? I'm guessing you must be getting less than about 65% efficiency below about 50 kph? I wouldve thought a Cro was a better choice anyway for 10kw - you must be making an awful lot of waste heat due to a mismatch between physical motor size and a 10kw input? This would force you into some rather big batteries?
Doctorbass said:Samd said:Yep, I thought it was well known that they had some issue with the earlier 20 strands. Most should be 21 now.
What voltage and amps are you running at 10kw? I'm guessing you must be getting less than about 65% efficiency below about 50 kph? I wouldve thought a Cro was a better choice anyway for 10kw - you must be making an awful lot of waste heat due to a mismatch between physical motor size and a 10kw input? This would force you into some rather big batteries?
Well not really. I'm pushing 16kW into the 5403 and it seem to take that really well without any overheat. If the MXUS is more efficient and give higher power output according to the ebike simulator, the motor should not be really in trouble for the purpose i will use these for: Drag racing... burst power short time lightweight motor.
The below 50kmh last less than 2 sec so i dont really care about efficiency in that region. But after about 80kmh high power last very long... well couple second...
i'm using 22s and 143A phase ( about 12.5kW)
By using the MXUS i'm saving about 20 pounds total for both wheels. And replacing the 1.8kWh NMC cells by the 366Wh pack i will also be saving about 25 pounds so total 45 pounds lighter on the drag bike witch represent 17% less total weight. The lightweight of the MXUS and the power capability are the only reason for the actual choice.. otherwise i would have used the Cro. Doc
Doc,Doctorbass said:I am in process to replace the poor 14 or 16 gauge phase wires on my 3T now and i also discovered that BOTH are 20 strands and not 21 as advertised!![]()
![]()
Is there anybody that REALLY have 21 strands on the 3T or is it wrong information?
btw I have measured the strand size and it is 24 AWG so 20 of them are equivalent to one gauge 11.
Fortunatly these motor are cheap! but next time i will pay 100$ more and avoid bad surprize and get the Cro or equivalent ( 205 50H)!
When i talk about bad surprise i mean, loose strands ( not properly tightened), 2 brokend strands ( one of the phase was higher ohm and 2 strands was broken), getting and paying for 3T 21 strands and get both with 20 strandspoor choice of phase wire ( 14 or 16 AWG) but the winding equiv is 11AWG.
But as the ebike simulator say, they seem to outperform the 5403 in term of efficiency and power output... i just hope these will hold all that power great like my 5403 does easy!
Doc
Doctorbass said:i'm using 22s and 143A phase ( about 12.5kW)
teslanv said:Doc,Doctorbass said:I am in process to replace the poor 14 or 16 gauge phase wires on my 3T now and i also discovered that BOTH are 20 strands and not 21 as advertised!![]()
![]()
Is there anybody that REALLY have 21 strands on the 3T or is it wrong information?
btw I have measured the strand size and it is 24 AWG so 20 of them are equivalent to one gauge 11.
Fortunatly these motor are cheap! but next time i will pay 100$ more and avoid bad surprize and get the Cro or equivalent ( 205 50H)!
When i talk about bad surprise i mean, loose strands ( not properly tightened), 2 brokend strands ( one of the phase was higher ohm and 2 strands was broken), getting and paying for 3T 21 strands and get both with 20 strandspoor choice of phase wire ( 14 or 16 AWG) but the winding equiv is 11AWG.
But as the ebike simulator say, they seem to outperform the 5403 in term of efficiency and power output... i just hope these will hold all that power great like my 5403 does easy!
Doc
Do you anticipate any problems running these motors in the 3Kw to 6Kw range that they are rated for?
John in CR said:That's not how you compute power. For peak power input for a short run you multiply peak battery current times the minimum voltage, both reported by the CA.
John in CR said:Phase current limit tells you the torque limit (Kt X phase current, which is the same as (9.549/Kv in rpm/V X phase current). Power output = torque X rpm , so you would need to know phase current across the rpm spectrum to determine the peak.
John in CR said:You mentioned before that you were using batteries tested to be 100C, are those Turnigy Nanotech's or did you find something better?
YES ! as well !John in CR said:If it's something better can you tell us more info?
John in CR said:Also, for the drag race be careful not to use too small a pack, since even if sag low voltage can drop significantly due to SOC near the end. eg If you're pulling 30kw from a 366wh pack it will be depleted by 34% in 15 seconds, which will be the equivalent of 7-8V of extra sag near the end of a 1/4 mile, when you need the highest voltage possible . Are you just running a 1/8th mile instead?
Samd said:That axle idea is rad - well done!
I still am thinking of some O shaped washers to do the same for a lower power install. Fit the fork legs first then feed them up into the crowns.
A few posts back I think you said phase current = 143 A, not battery current. This is what threw me.
Throwing this in the simulator for a 3T motor shows a pretty nice flat efficiency curve between 70kph and 100kph. After that it does drop off fast though!
Oh btw just in case you ask, I will use the clamping force of the fork dropout as well as a big dowel pin to transfer all torque from the axel to the fork base.
Samd said:That axle idea is rad - well done!
I still am thinking of some O shaped washers to do the same for a lower power install. Fit the fork legs first then feed them up into the crowns.
A few posts back I think you said phase current = 143 A, not battery current. This is what threw me.
Throwing this in the simulator for a 3T motor shows a pretty nice flat efficiency curve between 70kph and 100kph. After that it does drop off fast though!
louis raaijmakers said:Hi es,
I have the Mxus 3000 v1.
And unfortunaly i burned the windings with 110 phase and being stupid... :?
but is it possible to get a new v2 (or a v1) stator? a 4 turn to be accurate. otherwise i will have it re-wind.
I have e-mailed mxus but still haven't got a reply.
Greetings Louis