sacko
10 kW
19" is slightly smaller than a 24" bicycle setup.
I'll measure up my 19" and 26" this eve.
I'll measure up my 19" and 26" this eve.
windtrader said:I know this has been covered so I admit to being lazy on this one. With a 17" rim, and various tires mentioned here, what is the overall height difference between them and a regular 26" wheel with a typically oversized tire? Also, do many encounter experience clearance issues going with a 17" moto setup or is clearance similar to the 26"?
For at least the rear wheel, this question is one that needs to get answered in the first set during the initial build up of the "Assault". When ordering the MXUS, I know need to know how the check the box on laced and mounted rim choice.
Thanks
teslanv said:How to determine a moped tire size actual diameter:
The "size" (17", 18", 19", etc) is the diameter of the seat of the rim and the inside diameter of the tire itself. The height of the tire is its thickness. So add twice the tire thickness to the stated diameter of the tire and you get your outside diameter.
Example: my tires are 17 x2.25 so 17" + (2 x 2.25) = 21.5" outside diameter. If you change to a 17x2.75 tire size the outside diameter is 22.5"
Biclce tires are sized approximately to the OD of the tire, so a 26" tire has an OD of approximately 26"
The bottom bracket height will change by the difference in the radius of the tire, so going from a 26" bicycle tire to a 21.5" moped tire will drop your BB by 2 .25", unless you change the geometry of your bike frame, which is what the second wishbone connection point on my Farfle swing arm does.
markz said:But what people say here theres a lot of give in those moto rims so it acts like its own suspension. That peeks my interest right there alone to go moto.
It seems a heavy hub motor would influence doing a MC seup but I was more thinking that speed, safety, ad reliability were key factors too. If you're not going over 30mpg regularly, bike stuff seems a good call. It is not clear where that next break in speed is when you feel no worries something is going to blow making for one nasty high speed fall. On the other hand the additional weight is not trivial and carries performance hits. Finding the right balance point seems a bit elusive unless I'm overthinking it.generally you always have to make compromises. i personally look at the weight of the hub motor and than choose the rim and tires. below 8kg i use bicycle stuff which leads to a lightweight and high efficient bike. above 8kg its better to use moped stuff which gives me the durability i want to have there.
macribs said:Been away from forum for over a month now, so I am trying to catch up on several threads without reading it all. Pls bear with me if these Q's been asked before.
Has anyone tested the mxus 3000 motor by now? Pls share some real life numbers of top speed, how well motor works regarding heat etc.
What kind of power can be expected from a 20s setup? Anyone gone crazy 32s with the mxus 3000?
What sine wave controllers would be a great match to the mxus 3000?
teslanv said:On 17" MMP rims and 21.5" Diameter tires, 3T Winding I am getting 45MPH on 20S and 50 MPH on 22S with the MXUS Sine Wave 12FET 4110 controller. Stock phase wires on all.
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=66978
My best guess is that the performance would improve with an Adaptto, although I admit I have no basis for comparison. I have never used an adaptto. - However I believe that is what e4bike uses.macribs said:teslanv said:On 17" MMP rims and 21.5" Diameter tires, 3T Winding I am getting 45MPH on 20S and 50 MPH on 22S with the MXUS Sine Wave 12FET 4110 controller. Stock phase wires on all.
http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=66978
All things the same, do yo think the outcome would change if you switched controller to Adaptto?
I mean would an adaptto controller change the outcome or "drive-ability" in any way?
teslanv said:My best guess is that the performance would improve with an Adaptto, although I admit I have no basis for comparison. I have never used an adaptto. - However I believe that is what e4bike uses.
teslanv said:OK, gents. Here's the low-down.
Justin says that he can get by with just one motor of each winding for testing.
I will cover the cost of 16X4T Winding.
I set up a gofundme page for three additional windings, which would be the 21X3T, 12X5T and the 10X6T windings. I am hoping to raise $750 total ($250 per motor)
If you want to see the MXUS XF40-45H motors added to the Simulator, please make a small donation. I only need 30 people to donate $25 and we are good.
I will add these motors to our first order from MXUS, and Justin says that he should have time to test them by Spring.
Here is the Gofundme page:
http://www.gofundme.com/lcaew0
Thanks for your help.
Barent Hoffman (teslanv)
Allex said:If you change the resolution of the video you can clearly see that they have mxus3k motor. They Also mention this in the video, that they use minicro.
Test controller is Adaptto Max.
teslanv said:I can verify that the 3T in a 17" Moped Rim with 17X2.25" (21.5" DIAM) tires is a smoking hot thrill ride.![]()
Yes, in theory, you would have 64 strands of copper on the 16X4T vs. the 63 strands with the 21X3T. Madin says his 3T only came with 20X3T, which means only 60 Strands of fill. So the real question is, was that motor just a bad winding job, or is MXUS not able to make them with 63 (or 64) strands of fill??? - If the 3T only has 20 strands in parallel, I have to wonder how they can get 16 strands on the 4T.Allex said:So does 4x16 still provide best copper fill, thus less heat than 3x21(20)?
That is reassuring.e4bike.ru said:The 2 of 4T we've opened all had 16 strands. We haven't got any of the 3T so can't count the strands now.