thepronghorn said:What is the recommended nozzle size for printing your modules?
I really like the design. As intended, with all of the structure provided by 3d printed parts, it takes a lot of filament and printing time. One idea I have to reduce the amount of printing time is to just use 3d printed cell spacers/endcaps (example pictured below) to hold the cells and copper strips. The endcaps would be clamped together with end plates and threaded spacers. This goes back more towards the original snath design.
It could still use your very nice nickel coated predimpled copper strips and the clever top termination design with the inset nut (which I haven't modeled yet).
What do you think of this design? I can also move this discussion out of your sales thread if you'd like.![]()
That looks like a nice alternative.thepronghorn said:What is the recommended nozzle size for printing your modules?
I really like the design. As intended, with all of the structure provided by 3d printed parts, it takes a lot of filament and printing time. One idea I have to reduce the amount of printing time is to just use 3d printed cell spacers/endcaps (example pictured below) to hold the cells and copper strips. The endcaps would be clamped together with end plates and threaded spacers. This goes back more towards the original snath design.
It could still use your very nice nickel coated predimpled copper strips and the clever top termination design with the inset nut (which I haven't modeled yet).
What do you think of this design? I can also move this discussion out of your sales thread if you'd like.![]()
agniusm said:thepronghorn said:What is the recommended nozzle size for printing your modules?
I really like the design. As intended, with all of the structure provided by 3d printed parts, it takes a lot of filament and printing time. One idea I have to reduce the amount of printing time is to just use 3d printed cell spacers/endcaps (example pictured below) to hold the cells and copper strips. The endcaps would be clamped together with end plates and threaded spacers. This goes back more towards the original snath design.
It could still use your very nice nickel coated predimpled copper strips and the clever top termination design with the inset nut (which I haven't modeled yet).
What do you think of this design? I can also move this discussion out of your sales thread if you'd like.![]()
Hi. I would appreciate if you could move to a separate thread. I will share my input when i can.
If you would search my threads, there was one for developement of the no solder/weld system. Initially i was thinking making something what you are proposing. But there are couple of things.
Replacement of a bad cell would be more complicated as you would need to disassemble more.
You cant set how much you want to compress the foam unless you machine spacers and that adds cost and weight.
Modules would be larger in volume.
Its a bit fiddly to fit top unless your cells ar perfectly strait, i had to lasercut fishpaper so they would allign better and i could fit top lid.
I am not discouraging you, just sharing experiences i had on my jorney and ehy i chose this over that. I would like to see if something comes out of your thinking.
BTW, 3d printing takes long time, but its not manual, 1kg of plastic will make you 14 6P modules probably more with V2. By the time your ordered hardware will arrive, you can print average size battery.
My modules being rectangular boxes are still possible to arrange in 3 or more ways so you can still choose which fits better, say 20s could be arrange in: 2 rows of 10 or 4 rows of 5 or 5 rows of 4 or 20 rows of 1.
Then ther is simplicity. I had many firs time battery builder that told me it was very easy to make a battery.
I print with 0.4 nozzle, people tried courser and 0.6 was marginally ok, higher and it would miss important details
district9prawn said:Do you reckon your 26650 modules would work with 26800 if the print was scaled?
Beherit said:Gonna vouch for these again because I did on the old forum. Both my e-bike and my esk8 use NESE modules and I really couldn’t be happier. I couldn’t stand disassembling Vruzends with a nut on each cell and the caps cutting my hands into shreds, and the Arduino spot welder I bought was defective and I was fed up with it.
Bought NESE busbars and printed my modules and I finally had working batteries. No more vibration issues like Vruzend, no need to spend hours cutting apart nickel strips because of a single dead cell like a spot welded battery. Definitely worth the price of the bars. I’m surprised these don’t get more love.
I accidentally inserted a bad cell in the middle of one of my NESE packs a few months ago and by the time I found it scolding hot, I had that cell out of the pack and somewhere safe in under 5 minutes. Don’t think that would have been possible with any other system.
Sven said:The N.E.S.E. products I have received from you look very good. I think
it's a fantastic system you have developed. Will try to use this as the
base for my development. One type of cell that I would like to be able
to use is APR18650M1A.
If you factor in the cost of a welder for a beginner who is only going to make a handful of packs in his lifetime, maybe even just one. Then this is a cheaper option.john61ct said:The goal should be for a no-weld solution to securely carry just as much current.
The whole point is easy per-cell testing and replacement, making it superior, welding being the inferior approach.