Cool. You might be able to tie a throttle into the PWM and make the thing into a brushed motor controller with boost.
fechter said:Good pics, I like the one that's backlight to show the traces.
OMG, the 400w one has the same PWM chip as a Crystalyte controller. How funny, they must be dirt cheap.
Interesting how the 700w one has 3 separate sections apparently in parallel. Hmm.... 3 phase.
fechter said:In both cases, they use transformers. To radically change the output voltage of the dc-dc section, I think the transformer would need to be rewound or replaced. Since it runs at high frequency, the transformer might not have very many turns, so rewinding might not be that hard.
fechter said:The big high voltage capacitors are the output from the dc-dc converter section, and this is voltage regulated at 160+V. The inverter section is just a FET bridge that switches the output. You could cut the 60hz drive to the inverter FETs and feed them with a PWM controlled by a throttle.
fechter said:This might be perfect for one of those cheap 120v treadmill motors.
fechter said:OMG, the 400w one has the same PWM chip as a Crystalyte controller. How funny, they must be dirt cheap.
fechter said:Good sketch!
That's reverse engineering in action.
I wouldn't put windings in parallel unless I knew they were identical and properly phased. I does look like you could move the tap on the secondary to get a lower voltage to the bridge rectifier.
As I recall, usually there's some feedback somewhere to keep the output regulated. It might be an optical isolator. You could possibly mess with the feedback to vary the output voltage slightly.
To make a motor controller out of it, I would keep the dc-dc part pretty much intact and try to add a PWM to the output FETs.
You might make it work by messing with the dc-dc, but in order to get lower voltages, it will need to run discontinuous, which will reduce the power output at lower voltages. This would make for poor acceleration, but power would go back up at higher speeds.