Josh K.
100 W
Hello,
Thanks for adding in Bill. Yes, I agree. When we have strong constraints, like the Watt Hour Allotment meter at PIR, then the riders have to be really
creative with the bikes, and the riding strategy, not just over compensating with horse power.
I could show up with my race trike, pushing 500 amps at 50 volts, and leave everyone behind, but what fun is it to kill ants with a sledge hammer?
I would rather that everyone who is riding, follow the law, for what an E bike is, and restrict the power to 750 watts max. Perhaps a limit of 1,000 watt hours of Go Go juice, so that everyone will have to focus on making their system as efficient as possible. It will matter that the motor runs cool, rpms are right, and the rider's energy actually adds a significant amount that will make a difference.
When Bill Beat me by a couple of laps at PIR a couple of years ago, we left the others behind who did not take it to the proper level, and I learned that I needed to have solid sides on my aerodynamic cover, instead of a sock, as well as a couple of other subtle, but significant upgrades. Additionally, it made me be the best that I could, and helped me to do the best ride that I have ever done. Something like, 32 mph, in one hour, on 450 watts, around 12.6 watt hours per mile...It was awesome. And this is what an event like pikes peak can help to create, if we play by the rules.
So, as I see it, the values created by restricting the event to the legal definition of what an E bike actually are:
1) it will push the efficiencies of our designs-
2) it will be safer for all involved-
3) it will level the playing field, so that others can compete, without big dollar budgets-
4) it will cause aerodynamics to become a factor-
5) it will help the riders pedal power to be more significant-
6) it will be a better representation to the public, as to what they can expect when they buy and run a legal E bike.
I guess I will reach out to Pat, and see if I can help to re organize the event, and help to keep E bikes included.
Josh K.
Thanks for adding in Bill. Yes, I agree. When we have strong constraints, like the Watt Hour Allotment meter at PIR, then the riders have to be really
creative with the bikes, and the riding strategy, not just over compensating with horse power.
I could show up with my race trike, pushing 500 amps at 50 volts, and leave everyone behind, but what fun is it to kill ants with a sledge hammer?
I would rather that everyone who is riding, follow the law, for what an E bike is, and restrict the power to 750 watts max. Perhaps a limit of 1,000 watt hours of Go Go juice, so that everyone will have to focus on making their system as efficient as possible. It will matter that the motor runs cool, rpms are right, and the rider's energy actually adds a significant amount that will make a difference.
When Bill Beat me by a couple of laps at PIR a couple of years ago, we left the others behind who did not take it to the proper level, and I learned that I needed to have solid sides on my aerodynamic cover, instead of a sock, as well as a couple of other subtle, but significant upgrades. Additionally, it made me be the best that I could, and helped me to do the best ride that I have ever done. Something like, 32 mph, in one hour, on 450 watts, around 12.6 watt hours per mile...It was awesome. And this is what an event like pikes peak can help to create, if we play by the rules.
So, as I see it, the values created by restricting the event to the legal definition of what an E bike actually are:
1) it will push the efficiencies of our designs-
2) it will be safer for all involved-
3) it will level the playing field, so that others can compete, without big dollar budgets-
4) it will cause aerodynamics to become a factor-
5) it will help the riders pedal power to be more significant-
6) it will be a better representation to the public, as to what they can expect when they buy and run a legal E bike.
I guess I will reach out to Pat, and see if I can help to re organize the event, and help to keep E bikes included.
Josh K.