speedmd
10 MW
-dg said:If you read all the way to the bottom of your link you see the rebuttal. The test results were for resistance with the tire pressed against a 4.5 inch diameter roller. This deflects the tire in ways that a flat road does not so the collected data while interesting and possibly useful for sorting very similar tires cannot tell us anything about tires of different sizes or construction.swbluto said:And, this physicist at http://www.discoveryride.com/human/rolling.html, proves your idea of "higher rolling resistance because of smaller wheel" isn't the right kind of thinking, you're not seeing the forest for the trees. You need to take into account aero to calculate the total power losses, and smaller wheels are naturally more aerodynamic due to a lower frontal area (And possibly other unidentified affects). The difference in rolling resistance between 20" and 26" is much smaller than the difference in drag between 20" and 26".
+1
A 4.5" roller is a bogus test. Total waste of time and money on this test.