Patrick said:Nicely done!
Hope you going to make very sure that they don't all come on together . . . .
John in CR said:DrBass,
I'm probably being too elementary, but wouldn't a 3 way switch do the trick. Position 1 = parallel, position center = both off, position 2 = series. Wouldn't the center position OFF give you the sufficient delay that you need?
John
Doctorbass said:John in CR said:DrBass,
I'm probably being too elementary, but wouldn't a 3 way switch do the trick. Position 1 = parallel, position center = both off, position 2 = series. Wouldn't the center position OFF give you the sufficient delay that you need?
John
I already had a 4PDT switch ON-OFF-ON with off positioin on the middle. What i can say is that it's too easy to switch from ON to ON position.. too fast too.. The Contactor i bought take 13ms to brake contact and 11 to make it... it's very short and a switch that can be accidentally moved too fast could create a brief moment where all 3 contactor still activated...
I have no real idea on how i will built that delay.. maybe with some electronic circuits...
Doc
John in CR said:Doctorbass said:John in CR said:DrBass,
I'm probably being too elementary, but wouldn't a 3 way switch do the trick. Position 1 = parallel, position center = both off, position 2 = series. Wouldn't the center position OFF give you the sufficient delay that you need?
John
I already had a 4PDT switch ON-OFF-ON with off positioin on the middle. What i can say is that it's too easy to switch from ON to ON position.. too fast too.. The Contactor i bought take 13ms to brake contact and 11 to make it... it's very short and a switch that can be accidentally moved too fast could create a brief moment where all 3 contactor still activated...
I have no real idea on how i will built that delay.. maybe with some electronic circuits...
Doc
Okay then, how about a pair of the on-off-on switches oriented so you can't flip them both at the same time and wired so both must be in position 1 for parallel and both in position 2 for series. Shouldn't the time it takes to move your finger from 1 switch to the other be sufficient delay without intentionally trying to beat it using 2 hands?
John
TylerDurden said:Would a simple R-C delay work... You want them to open fast and delay before closing, yes?
Doctorbass said:John in CR said:Okay then, how about a pair of the on-off-on switches oriented so you can't flip them both at the same time and wired so both must be in position 1 for parallel and both in position 2 for series. Shouldn't the time it takes to move your finger from 1 switch to the other be sufficient delay without intentionally trying to beat it using 2 hands?
John
John, can you just draw a little schematic of your idea, I guess it would solve the problem, but i dont see exactly what your mean...
Doc