craneplaneguy said:
Grid tied solar is many times more cost effective and long term then small off grid solar systems, just saying. You never waste a watt when grid tied, either you use it directly or it turns your meter backwards, to be used later. I used 1500 KWH last month, and still have a 10,000 KWH credit with my utility. Having been off grid for years, 28, earlier, I'd never mess with batteries again if I could help it. Except for ebike batteries of course!
News flash ..... If you don't have batteries you ARE NOT OFF GRID. Just saying, you draw from the grid nightly. In fact when the grid goes down you are every bit as powerless as people without solar (even in summer sunlight). Federal law mandates all grid tied systems must completely shut down when main power is lost. Whats the point of having solar if you can't use it when the power goes out?!
Power companies in the U.S have caught on to the fact that net metering is starting to heavily cut into their profit margins and they are committed to get rid of it. Many states (most recently Nevada) have already passed legislation allowing utilities to purchase solar energy at half the rate they charge you to use it. This is why Tesla, Solar City and many others have went to battery storage vs grid feed. All my batteries get charged first to 100% SOC then and only then do I feed back into my home. Im not into playing kissy face with power companies here in SoCal that charge people nearly half a dollar per kWh but subject their customers to rolling brownouts (the longest I recently recall lasting 18 hours).
News flash? Hardly.You are absolutely correct, but I never claimed to be off the grid as you suggest. While I have NO power when the grid goes down. I don't care if the water is flowing, the wind is blowing, and it's high noon. So what? The advantages of being grid tied, admittingly at least for me and my utility, so far outweigh being off grid, it is a no brainer. The "point" of having solar is to provide all your power, Captain Obvious here. If I get too upset over the very few hours PER YEAR the grid goes down, I could start my welder/generator for a few hours, but even that is too much bother for what is a minor inconvenience. The LAST thing I would do is spoil my system by lowering the efficiency during the 99.999% of the time the grid is UP, by introducing batteries into the equation.
Again, we have different utilities, the power hasn't gone off line here for 18 hours total in the entire time I've been grid tied, 10 years. Still, think of the larger PV system you could have installed, if you'd spent the money for more PV instead of on batteries, charge controllers, load diverters, and their associated wiring, breakers etc. The first time I bid out a grid tied system for a customer, after years of doing off grid installs, I couldn't believe how the parts count, and the labor, went down! For me anyway, the "romance" of being off grid faded long ago, I'm proud to be a Idaho Power customer! The other thing I take comfort in....is IF my utility get's all hinky and starts reaming me out for what I feel is excessive fees for using their system as my power dump, then I'll go off grid, but not before. Most people don't have a clue how large a battery bank it takes to realistically operate their home for any length of time, in the manner that they have grown accustomed to. A few hours here and there of no power, just are not that big a deal compared to the battery based alternative. Tesla can keep their batteries, for now anyway.
https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/why-is-net-metering-under-attack
http://www.ases.org/2013/03/solar-rights-net-metering-under-attack/
http://www.solaramerica.org/2014/06/23/utility-net-metering-under-attack-in-arizona-and-cali-why-should-you-care/
I'm in the process of converting my system over to complete TESLA Model S battery modules as seen here...
https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/threads/plan-off-grid-solar-with-a-model-s-battery-pack-at-the-heart.34531/page-5