Wrong again the motor is small and simple in most EV,s using a lot less materials then an ICE the Tesla does not use permanent magnets its a induction motor.nutspecial said:Arlo1 : Hold on.
You missed the most crucial part. What ever you use to make the wood gas has emissions as well. I mean are you using an ICE to try to harness torque from the fuel being burnt?
Well, I admitted it's extremely impractical to use for transport unless it is used like natgas or propane, so you're not hauling the gasifier with you.
I at least plan to use it for stationary power (cooking and supplementing solar& wind)
But bottling it would be awesome.
Then it would make sense because you're using existing ice vehicles instead of making brand new ones. And when we need more, how is manufacturing of new ice vehicles worse than manufacturing ev's? (expecially taking the large amounts of copper and battery metals)
I sincerely question the impact of having even 90% converted to ev. I think there would be problems with the sheer amount of scarce things like neodymium, lithium, cobalt, even copper. Not only problems of cleaner manufacture, but diminishing resources over time with recycling losses.
.
The battery uses a small amount of metal but you only need to mine it once then recycle it as well the battery lasts a very long time.