Worst foods declared by the World Health Org. pg 37

markz said:
Biden is at 42 Executive orders in 2 weeks, see how many executive orders were done from previous presidents from inaguration to OCTOBER 13 of their 1st presidency year. Biden still has 9.5 months to go to reach October 13'th.


the cleanup after a 4 year drug infused rave is a bit more invasive then the cleanup after an opera.
 
markz said:
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2021/politics/biden-executive-orders/

how evil, there is nothing that gives money to billionares or allow cops to shoot more black people. no wonder republicans hate him.
 
flippy said:
the cleanup after a 4 year drug infused rave is a bit more invasive then the cleanup after an opera.

Shows how much Opera YOU have ever attended. Yeah, they said things about what Mussolini started out doing and those such as yourself were there to scoff at the malcontents.

Oh, flippy, before I forget. Nicotine has a new screed and he's all alone there. I could post and attract attention to it, but there's no excuse for you letting him down by not getting yourself in there to prop him up.

flippy said:
you have been constantly editing quotes to remove any reference to it.

No, I'm constantly trying to cut SOME of the excess text from your posts yet still have something that's a quote in there. See, unlike with my posts, nobody shows up to read yours the first time so why put them through it again? (DON'T answer, we don't need additional text from you.)

You've already had how many questions from me? (Oops,just asked another.) You never answer. For example:

Dauntless said:
If you know that, why do you keep repeating them?
Strictly because your rulers told you do?
Why DO you carry on?

I mean, that's nothing. You just don't answer. Because you don't HAVE any answers.

Wait a minute. Is that it? You perceive me as having ALL the answers, so you don't even need a coherent question and I'm supposed to have an answer for it. Ah, the wisdom of the flying monkeys. . . .

Meanwhile, Mr. Gruber, you're missing it. NEW Yaron Brook on Ayn Rand.

[youtube]2-S2tTa8ins[/youtube]
 
Dauntless said:
flippy said:
the cleanup after a 4 year drug infused rave is a bit more invasive then the cleanup after an opera.
Shows how much Opera YOU have ever attended. Yeah, they said things about what Mussolini started out doing and those such as yourself were there to scoff at the malcontents. Oh, flippy, before I forget. Nicotine has a new screed and he's all alone there. I could post and attract attention to it, but there's no excuse for you letting him down by not getting yourself in there to prop him up.
flippy said:
you have been constantly editing quotes to remove any reference to it.
No, I'm constantly trying to cut SOME of the excess text from your posts yet still have something that's a quote in there. See, unlike with my posts, nobody shows up to read yours the first time so why put them through it again? (DON'T answer, we don't need additional text from you.) You've already had how many questions from me? (Oops,just asked another.) You never answer. For example:
Dauntless said:
If you know that, why do you keep repeating them? Strictly because your rulers told you do? Why DO you carry on?
I mean, that's nothing. You just don't answer. Because you don't HAVE any answers. Wait a minute. Is that it? You perceive me as having ALL the answers, so you don't even need a coherent question and I'm supposed to have an answer for it. Ah, the wisdom of the flying monkeys. . . . Meanwhile, Mr. Gruber, you're missing it. NEW Yaron Brook on Ayn Rand.

dont lie (its a sin remember), you ONLY edited out the question or any reference to it.

how come you you are so unwilling to just say that your argument of "careful, working with others" is bullshit when religion is the leading cause of unnatural deaths when it comes to doctors that work in abortion clinics (just to name a single example) and you rather attack the person asking the question then caring or even defending the argument itself?

is it because your argument is indefensible?
 
D- i emailed ARI- ayn rand institute and asked for a link so i could read letters from students thanking them. Well :shock: they don't have any. :shock: this is really really BAD. a big clue.
Yaron Brook is or was the chairman. While he has memorized the works of Rand, he IMO lacks a moral compass. A very serious deficiency for someone in his position. Might help explain why ARI is at a dead end. (no vision on how to take Rands great ideas to the next level)
 
https://ij.org/ll/february-2021-volume-30-issue-1/windy-city-entrepreneurs-aim-for-the-sky-in-south-side-pitch-competition/
Seems (i'm sure no expert) the law is that black racism is OK. If that's what blacks want, so be it. Flippy is racist so i would expect kudos from flippy. BUT to me this sounds like the old "separate but equal" with the phrase "equal treatment in a court of law"
I don't have a strong opinion here, just trying to learn. :thumb:
 
"Black racism" is not equivalent to actual White racism, because Blacks who don't like white folks aren't convinced that we are subhuman. They are instead convinced that we can't be trusted, or counted on to do the right thing. This belief is based on hundreds of years of actual White behavior, unlike real racism, which is essentially a rationalization of our abuse of other races.

People who complain about Black "racism" are pretty much always racist themselves, BTW: they can't see the basis for Blacks distrusting Whites either because they have a 'No Special Privileges for Anyone' mindset that ignores centuries of institutional obstacles put in the way of progress for African Americans, or because they have struggled to advance themselves and aren't willing to accept that it's still worse for other races. My Father was one of the latter: he didn't think that Blacks are inferior, he just didn't believe that they deserve extra help, because HE never got any.
 
Matt Gruber said:
https://ij.org/ll/february-2021-volume-30-issue-1/windy-city-entrepreneurs-aim-for-the-sky-in-south-side-pitch-competition/ Seems (i'm sure no expert) the law is that black racism is OK. If that's what blacks want, so be it. Flippy is racist so i would expect kudos from flippy. BUT to me this sounds like the old "separate but equal" with the phrase "equal treatment in a court of law"
I don't have a strong opinion here, just trying to learn. :thumb:

first learn what systemic racism is. then learn about how certain locations have more people from one race then another race. then learn that you might the racist in this conversation. just imagine if there was "the white mall" in the middle of the bronx. would you have the same problem with that?

dont go pointing fingers before pointing it to yourself first. its kinda sad really, you are trying so hard to keep deflecting your own personal opinons onto others that you cant even see how much of an racist asshole you are.

TL;DR: no, the black mall is not racist. you are the racist for even making the argument. it just shows you have no clue about what the real problem is with racism in america. (spoiler: you are the problem)
 
A "white mall" anywhere would be racist IMO.
am i wrong here?
 
Matt Gruber said:
A "white mall" anywhere would be racist IMO.
am i wrong here?

yes.

not understanding why a black mall is "fine" and a white mall is not is exactly the problem.
 
flippy said:
Matt Gruber said:
A "white mall" anywhere would be racist IMO.
am i wrong here?

yes.

not understanding why a black mall is "fine" and a white mall is not is exactly the problem.

:bigthumb: good answer! :shock: :bigthumb:
The white only mall is illegal, perhaps under anti-trust laws (and others) Whites, being the majority, have treated blacks unfairly and this "monopoly" has been broken up by the congress and the courts.
blackmall or indianmall , being a minority, can't dominate society and they can't be called a monopoly, so they can discriminate legally if they want :bigthumb:
 
Matt Gruber said:
:bigthumb: good answer! :shock: :bigthumb:
The white only mall is illegal, perhaps under anti-trust laws (and others) Whites, being the majority, have treated blacks unfairly and this "monopoly" has been broken up by the congress and the courts. blackmall or indianmall , being a minority, can't dominate society and they can't be called a monopoly, so they can discriminate legally if they want :bigthumb:

neither the black mall or whatever race mall would prevent other races from having a shop there because they are not racist assholes, the white mall would. you are the one that is just pissy about black mall even existing or makes a fuss about.


dug up this oldie but goldie, replace the dildo/gun with a mall and you basicallly have your argument.

cLOcfYY.jpg

EuPK7yq.jpg

5AE8bEk.jpg

8SetFxW.jpg

i0QeoAR.jpg

y0N8yQv.jpg
 
flippy said:
how come you you are so unwilling to just say that your argument of "careful, working with others" is bullshit when religion is the leading cause of unnatural deaths when it comes to doctors that work in abortion clinics (just to name a single example) and you rather attack the person asking the question then caring or even defending the argument itself?

is it because your argument is indefensible?

Because the Supreme Court IS about being careful, working with others, things a Fascist bully such as yourself doesn't believe in. Because I get tired of your lame efforts to bully me like crawling antlike onto my nose makes you a threat.

How come you refuse to put me in ignore? Because that's admitting pretty much everything you've posted in indefensible?

Black racism ok? No.

Black racism common? Debatable.

Flippy racist for trying to call everyone racist as part of his racial outbursts? Indisputably.
 
Dauntless said:
Because the Supreme Court IS about being careful, working with others, things a Fascist bully such as yourself doesn't believe in. Because I get tired of your lame efforts to bully me like crawling antlike onto my nose makes you a threat.

you have no clue what the supreme court is about. just like you have no clue what a fascist or a racist is.
 
flippy did prove Yaron Brook's observation that many blacks are racist :( I had hoped Brook was wrong.
I've read that those that were abused as children grow up to abuse their children. I had hoped that was not true, but i guess it is true like those that grew up being hated learn to hate. Both are sad situations to read about, i didn't have either so i was lucky i guess. How either situation is corrected is over my pay grade.
Thanks for the comments! :bigthumb:
 
flippy said:
Dauntless said:
Because the Supreme Court IS about being careful, working with others, things a Fascist bully such as yourself doesn't believe in. Because I get tired of your lame efforts to bully me like crawling antlike onto my nose makes you a threat.

you have no clue what the supreme court is about. just like you have no clue what a fascist or a racist is.

Actually I'm the one demonstrating he DOES in this conversation. You hoped your redefinition would somehow fool the world, but reality shows it's failing.
 
Matt Gruber said:
flippy did prove Yaron Brook's observation that many blacks are racist :( I had hoped Brook was wrong.
who said you had to be white to be a racist?
 
flippy said:
Matt Gruber said:
flippy did prove Yaron Brook's observation that many blacks are racist :( I had hoped Brook was wrong.
who said you had to be white to be a racist?

BLM, Antifa, Cultural Marxism, CNN, MSNBC. . . .

Some of these movements have their whole alternate definition.
 
Dauntless said:
BLM, Antifa, Cultural Marxism, CNN, MSNBC. . . .
Some of these movements have their whole alternate definition.

like i said, you have no clue what a racist is or a fascist for that matter.

DANGER ALERT: there is one guy that is both of those things and he is REALLY close , close as inside your house close.


if you want to find it go to your bathroom and look in the mirror.

5MKUpR4.jpg



slighty more ontopic:

if you morons cant figure out that an asian, mexian, italian or whatever resturant or supermarket has NOTHING to do with racism you REALLY should reconsider your position of being the "superior" race here...

race is a thing, acknowledge someone's race is not a problem. making a problem about it is the hallmark of being a racist. congrats, you are the racist. i dont see you haveing the same conversation about your local chinatown, asian supermarket, taco bell or whatever.
 
flippy said:
DANGER ALERT: there is one guy that is both of those things and he is REALLY close , close as inside your house close.

Not him, only his posts, NOT the same thing. YOU will never be in my house, oh racist/fascist

flippy said:
race is a thing, acknowledge someone's race is not a problem. making a problem about it is the hallmark of being a racist. congrats, you are the racist. i dont see you haveing the same conversation about your local chinatown, asian supermarket, taco bell or whatever.

So all these various ethnicities talking about the foolish leftie racists carrying on virtue signaling as though they're fooling anyone. They point at you and say "Yeah, HIM!"
 
Dauntless said:
So all these various ethnicities talking about the foolish leftie racists carrying on virtue signaling as though they're fooling anyone. They point at you and say "Yeah, HIM!"

your black and white (little phun there) worldview that its all or nothing is something you need to work on.

i dont even know what "leftist" means in your terms, and even then you need to explain if i should be offended by being called that.

if you want to offend someone you first need to make sure they are offended by being called that.
 
Matt Gruber said:
flippy did prove Yaron Brook's observation that many blacks are racist :( I had hoped Brook was wrong.
I've read that those that were abused as children grow up to abuse their children. I had hoped that was not true, but i guess it is true like those that grew up being hated learn to hate. Both are sad situations to read about, i didn't have either so i was lucky i guess. How either situation is corrected is over my pay grade.
Thanks for the comments! :bigthumb:

How did @flippy 'prove' that many blacks are racist? Why are y'all's discussing racism at all? Are any of you experiencing it? From the 2nd grade on I was bused out of my very black neighborhood to an all white school several miles away. I was the only black kid in several grades and once into middle school that only got worse. Whites in South Africa are ~8% of the population but even after Apartheid they still maintain all the power and control in the country. Whites in the U.S. will NEVER be only 8% of the population, where does the 'fear' come from?

I assure you, blacks do not spend much time, if any, discussing white people the way whites seem obsessed with black people. A high profile murder of an unarmed black woman is bound to elicit some protest THESE DAYS because of the heightened awareness of police brutality towards people of color. That isn't racism!

I don't know, and I don't care how many blacks are racist towards white people because I haven't seen it MATTER! That white guy who went to the Black church with an AR-15, not Dylan Roof, this was after that, an older guy, he was inspired by Roof to go kill some black people himself. The church was locked because after the Roof incident ... well ... black churches got more careful. So he went to a nearby Walmart and shot the first two black people he saw. They died. I don't know what happened to him but I learned that his wife was black.
 
Back
Top