That's all very interesting guys!.. this thread is becoming very technical and i love it!
I agree with you Zapat about the phase current with a 5303 and a 5304..
I agree with all of you..
let me remind what is important to know here:
- first, The simulator on ebikes.ca reflect the exact conditions i test and it is aan excellent aproximation of the real life test i do!: Ex:when i simulate the same conditions than my actual setup on my mongoose it is very close to the real speef and power i measure!
I use these data: 90V ( i dont use 100V because at 95-100V that's like a floating voltage right after charge.. and the firsts Ah will drop the voltage of the battery to around 95V. So i preffer using 90V because this is a very flat reagiob of my battery and give me a safe margin) 5303, 24" 100A, 0.1ohm battery, 0.01ohm controller 100% throttle.
What i calculate on the simulator is to try to keep 115km/h at max efficiency peak wich represent better the point of the real max speed. ( in fact, i observed that on the simulator, the max speed i can do is always right where the max efficiency peak is on the graph.
So by having a goal of 115kmh, i add a kind of safe margin that have more chance to reach the 105-110km/h real goal (60-65mph) since the actual official world record is 58.6mph ( Lowell know that :wink
One more important thing is the air drag!!.. i did not calculated anything about that from now but my instinct say that if i go with a 20" rim, the bike will be 2" lower than using a 24".. so air drag can be ameliorated as well. and ameliorating air drag mean few km/h more for the top speed !
Than i tried many... eee.. MANY different matching between 5303, 5304, delta/Wye or not, 20" rim, 24" rim .. etc
What i know for sure is that with my actual setup(5305 100A 90V) I really reach 8650W max without any problem...
since riding at 50kmh require around 1500W on a MTB, riding at 100kmh would requier 4x that power that is 6000W continuous !.. .and 115km/h probably draw 8000W!
When i first imaginated a setup like that i thought using a 5303 on a 20" rim or a 5304 on a 24" rim... and on the simulator... BOTH results are VERY CLOSE !!.. the 5304 24" have a bit lower torque at 0rpm but a bit higher at high rpm!!
see pictures below.
So i would thing that since they are very close, their phase current would be probably the same or very close too right?.. lower rim diameter but higher rpm, less troque = higher rim diameter with low rpm higher torque... total would be same work.. same power?.. right?
so.. in this case, the 5303 on 20" have the 2" lower ebike setup advantage... and the the 5304 on 24" have the advantage of having 10% more torque at max speed...
so.. where is the trade off between little better acceleration and less air drag (5303 on 20" rim) and better top end torque but more air drag on the 5304...
The 5304 on a 20" rim instead on 24 is too risky, have not enough speed margin to ensure me for the 115km/h... and.. if it rach let say 100km/h.. this is too close to the actual world record.. and i would be dissapointed to just get like 57 or 58mph and not trully being above that 58.6km/h! with a 20" rim, with a 5303, the current will still be high to get the last km/h.. and less on the 5304.. ( for a same rim diameter)
I know that some say that the 5303 would draw more current for the same power.. but i dot think so because this one would be on a 20" rim diameter and the 5304 would be on a larger rim... so this is becoming equivalent right?
I know that at high speed.. maybe above 90km/h the torque is becoming more important because of the high air drag to fight with...
I think that both combinaison of the 5303 20"and 5304 24" would do the same results with the delta wye...
About magnetic saturation, like i said, i have often peaked at 8650W and ran on hill at max throttle needing 5500W continuous during 30sec with my actual 12fets crystalyte... so if i need let say 7500W during the last 10 sec of the 1/4 mile
that should not be a problem with a 18 mosfet controller...
NOTE: Since the simulator seems to not work for power above 5000W or 100A and HV, i've put the current limit to 50A instead of 100A.. so the top speed is the same in every simulations and the 50% power generated does niot affect the real top speed cause it does not take account of the wind drag that need more power...
Also, for the predicted results with the delta/wye system i just had 50% more volt since the real test showed me that the speed increase is more like 50% and not 73% like theorical calculations show...
but to recalculate the speed on the simulator, to make is still work at 140V, the curent need again to be reduced to keep under 5000W... Justin should ameliorate it for crazy people like some of us!!
Doc